The decline of the scientic method? - Mothering Forums
Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
#1 of 11 Old 09-15-2011, 08:15 AM - Thread Starter
 
shiningpearl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: in the shadows
Posts: 360
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Just ran across some interesting articles/studies and thought I would share.  They aren't about vaccinations, but what they have to say definitely do affect the Proof that is given for reasons to or not to vaccinate, or the safety and effectiveness that is claimed in studies that are PUBLISHED.

 

http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/12/13/101213fa_fact_lehrer?currentPage=1

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1182327/

 

One is from a few years ago, but I found it interesting to read in addition to the article from last December.

Ahimsa and Xerxella like this.

Done with diapers!!

shiningpearl is offline  
#2 of 11 Old 09-17-2011, 06:31 PM
 
mamakah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 789
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Great links. Thanks!

mamakah is offline  
#3 of 11 Old 09-24-2011, 07:04 PM
 
annjo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 100
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

These are great articles! I read an the article about John Ionnidis in the Atlantic earlier this year, and I found it really fascinating. It is a great reminder that "science" is unavoidably human. 


It is the first responsibility of every citizen to question authority.
Benjamin Franklin
annjo is offline  
#4 of 11 Old 09-27-2011, 12:38 PM
 
sandygottstein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Anchorage, Alaska
Posts: 17
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Those of you have not seen it yet might be interested in my latest column:

The Attempted Hijacking of “Science” by the Ultra Pro-Vaccine Crowd

http://www.vaccinationnews.com/20110921TheAttemptedHijackingGottsteinS

 

All the best,

Sandy

sandygottstein is offline  
#5 of 11 Old 09-28-2011, 11:43 AM
 
annjo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 100
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Thanks so much Sandy. The use of the term "science" of late is very troubling. I am very wary when I see it used in this way.

 

A recent infuriating example from the New York Times regarding the Michelle Bachman HPV comments:

 

"The issue pushes many buttons with conservatives: overreach of government in health care decisions, suspicion that sex education leads to promiscuity and even the belief — debunked by science — that childhood vaccinations may be linked to mental disorders."

 

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/14/us/politics/republican-candidates-battle-over-hpv-vaccine.html

 

What does that mean?

 

 


It is the first responsibility of every citizen to question authority.
Benjamin Franklin
annjo is offline  
#6 of 11 Old 09-29-2011, 11:39 AM
 
sandygottstein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Anchorage, Alaska
Posts: 17
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

annjo, What does that mean, indeed?

sandygottstein is offline  
#7 of 11 Old 09-29-2011, 05:37 PM
 
beckybird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The Shattered Paradigm
Posts: 1,833
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)

This is their talking point. They say debunked, and it is repeated by all the parents. Did the parents research if it was really debunked, and how? No, since the news said so, then it must be true.

 


               "Those who are able to see beyond the shadows and lies of their culture will never be understood, let alone believed, by the masses."

                ~Captain Hammer (j/k, it was Plato)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

beckybird is online now  
#8 of 11 Old 09-30-2011, 05:27 AM
 
Jugs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 476
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I guess its simplistic way of saying science does not support a causation link. The trouble is that the phrase is dismissive and doesn't encourage discussion.


 

 

Jugs is offline  
#9 of 11 Old 09-30-2011, 06:26 AM
 
Xerxella's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 1,924
Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 31 Post(s)

Very interesting articles shining pearl. 

 

Thank you. 


Married to one of the last good guys left Jim
Mom to AJ 4/07 and Genevieve 5/09

And then: I'm really, really tired of making angels.

But wait, could it really be true?


The whole story at: www.xerxella.blogspot.com
Xerxella is offline  
#10 of 11 Old 09-30-2011, 11:34 AM
 
sandygottstein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Anchorage, Alaska
Posts: 17
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Those who say the science does not support a causation link are very selective about what they call "science" and tend to dismiss or ignore that which doesn't support concerns about vaccination.  And they do not appear at all concerned about the influence industry has on what does get studied and published.

sandygottstein is offline  
#11 of 11 Old 10-01-2011, 07:07 PM
 
annjo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 100
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Agreed! Investigation of hypotheses regarding vaccine safety do not occur in a setting of free scientific inquiry. The scientific method isn't even relevant if QUESTIONS ARE NEVER ASKED. Even setting aside the very significant issue of funding, only a very brave--or maybe naive-- researcher would dare wander into this area. Reputations and careers can be lost. I'm sure the example that was made of Andrew Wakefield serves as a cautionary tale for any scientist--as I believe it was meant to.  Merely suggesting an association (NOT causation) between vaccination and autism (for example) immediately sets into motion the full force of the mainstream scientific community that will not hesitate to crush dissent.

 

 


It is the first responsibility of every citizen to question authority.
Benjamin Franklin
annjo is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Drag and Drop File Upload
Drag files here to attach!
Upload Progress: 0
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Mothering Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off