Flu shot info: "60% effective" is marketing spin on useless shot - Page 3 - Mothering Forums

Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-24-2012, 11:30 AM
 
Marnica's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 5,470
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)

I agree with Kathy - people should be able to post or link to whatever site THEY feel is helpful to them. (within reason - I realize there are some sites like whale.to that are inappropraite for other reasons) If a person doesn't feel Mercola or Natural News is a trustworthy site, it is their right to discard the information, not look at the post - whatever. I personally do not feel either of the above sites are the end all be all, but have found articles there I find useful (not necessarily on vaccinations).

 

On the other hand, Mamakah, you say people should just not post things that do not have strong biases, yet most of the mainstream sites that are accepted as valid credible sources of information are LOADED with biases. There is very little information out there on either side of this complicated matter that is not tainted by some degree of bias. It is up to the reader/person doing the research to wade through all of the information and decide what is valid for them. Anything else is just censorship IMO.


If the people let government decide what foods they eat and what medicines they take, their bodies will soon be in as sorry a state as are the souls of those who live under tyranny." Thomas Jefferson.

Marnica is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
 
User Tag List

Thread Tools


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off