MMR doctor wins high court appeal - Mothering Forums

Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
#1 of 3 Old 03-09-2012, 04:05 PM - Thread Starter
 
Taximom5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,311
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 90 Post(s)
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-17283751

"A doctor found guilty of serious professional misconduct Over the MMR controversy has won his High Court appeal against being struck off."

http://www.ageofautism.com/2012/03/professor-john-walker-smith-exonerated-in-autism-mmr-case.html

"The welcome decision to exonerate Prof. Walker-Smith is a clear indication that the GMC's case against the Royal Free doctors was manufactured to discredit any association between bowel disease, autism conditions and some of the parents' reported link to the MMR vaccine. The allegations levelled at Prof. Walker-Smith and the Royal Free team now have to be viewed with total scepticism as nothing more than a witch hunt by vested interests at the highest level in Government, media and the pharmaceutical industry."

http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2012/mar/07/mmr-row-doctor-appeal

MMR row: high court rules doctor should not have been struck off
Striking off by General Medical Council of Professor John Walker-Smith for serious professional misconduct 'cannot stand'

An insightful comment from a reader ( "Beth" ) on The Age of Autism blog:

"It's important to remind anybody who will listen that children who do have reactions to their shots are NEVER studied. Never. Even and especially those children who have been compensated by the Vaccine Court, they have NEVER been studied to determine what it is about them, their unique make up that may have made them susceptible to injury from their vaccines. Why is that? My child's reaction happened in 2002 right after a round of shots. I'm still waiting on the call from a university research team to study her. I naively thought this would happen. That she would be a case study subject, that the experts would want to learn from her to make sure the immediate encephaletic brain injury reaction would not happen to another child. Of course back then I believed the myth that the chances of a reaction are one in a million too. Until this HUGE, GAPING hole in the body of knowledge of vaccine science is filled with meaningful and truthful information, then vaccine policy will remain dishonest medicine."
Taximom5 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
#2 of 3 Old 03-16-2012, 06:20 PM
 
Dot-to-Dot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 488
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)

I'm really looking forward to see what happens next with Andrew Wakefield...

mom0810 likes this.
Dot-to-Dot is offline  
#3 of 3 Old 03-19-2012, 07:35 PM
 
beckybird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The Shattered Paradigm
Posts: 2,017
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 70 Post(s)


 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dot-to-Dot View Post

I'm really looking forward to see what happens next with Andrew Wakefield...

So am I!
 

 

Quote:

Originally Posted by Taximom5 View Post

 Until this HUGE, GAPING hole in the body of knowledge of vaccine science is filled with meaningful and truthful information, then vaccine policy will remain dishonest medicine."


So true. We can hardly call vaccine science "science", can we?

member234098 likes this.

 
 
 "Medical propaganda ops are, in the long run, the most dangerous. They appear to be neutral. They wave no political banners. They claim to be science. For these reasons, they can accomplish the goals of overt fascism without arousing suspicion.” — Jon Rappoport
 
 
 
beckybird is online now  
Reply

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off