Can we trust the pharmaceutical industry? - Mothering Forums
Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
#1 of 7 Old 07-02-2012, 11:08 AM - Thread Starter
 
Taximom5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,086
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)

http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2012/07/02/business/ap-us-justice-glaxosmithkline.html?_r=2&hp

 

"GlaxoSmithKline LLC will pay $3 billion and plead guilty to promoting two popular drugs for unapproved uses and to failing to disclose important safety information on a third in the largest health care fraud settlement in U.S. history, the Justice Department said Monday.

 

Accompanying the criminal case was a civil settlement in which the government said the company's improper marketing included providing doctors with expensive resort vacations, European hunting trips, high-paid speaking tours and even tickets to a Madonna concert."

 

Apparently, GSK entered a guilty plea ("The company's guilty plea and sentence have to be approved by a federal court in Massachusetts."), but turned around and made a statement that sounds like they're recanting the guilty plea after the fact:

 

"In a statement, GlaxoSmithKline said it disagreed with some statements the Justice Department made in court papers. For example, the company said its settlement with the government does 'not constitute an admission of any liability or wrongdoing in the selling and marketing of Lamictal, Zofran, Imitrex, Lotronex, Flovent, Valtrex, Avandia or Advair products. The government also made allegations about Paxil, Wellbutrin that the company did not admit.' "

Bokonon likes this.
Taximom5 is offline  
#2 of 7 Old 07-02-2012, 11:14 AM - Thread Starter
 
Taximom5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,086
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)

http://www.courthousenews.com/2012/06/27/47851.htm

 

"Merck has known for a decade that its mumps vaccine is "far less effective" than it tells the government, and it falsified test results and sold millions of doses of "questionable efficacy," flooding and monopolizing the market, a primary caregiver claims in a federal antitrust class action.
     Alabama-based Chatom Primary Care sued Merck on Monday, the week after the unsealing of a False Claims Act complaint two relators filed in 2010."

 

 

http://www.naturalnews.com/036328_Merck_mumps_vaccine_False_Claims_Act.html

 

 

Merck vaccine fraud exposed by two Merck virologists; company faked mumps vaccine efficacy results for over a decade, says lawsuit



 

 

Taximom5 is offline  
#3 of 7 Old 07-04-2012, 10:55 PM
 
wookumus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: OR
Posts: 112
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

No, we cannot trust the industry.  It spends more on marketing and advertising than it does on legitimate new-drug research.  And then take a look at many of the so-called "new" drugs on the market.  They are simply cleaned up mono-isomeric compounds from the original compound that contained r/s isomers, i.e. Celexa --> Lexapro.  I was able to do this kind of science in a basic organic chemistry class.  Let's face it, they want to make money and if they cured and/or eliminated disease, they would end their own business.  These companies make lots of money from keeping the general population uneducated, mildly ill and scared.  Bahh...humbug ;)


Mom to DS 9/18/09 and DS 3/28/13
Laugh it up, fuzzball biggrinbounce.gif 

wookumus is offline  
#4 of 7 Old 07-05-2012, 04:24 AM
 
emmy526's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,641
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Why Isn't The US "Free" Press  Reporting Vaccine problems?

http://vactruth.com/2012/06/30/free-press-vaccine-problems/?utm_source=The+Vaccine+Truth+Newsletter&utm_campaign=91daf8945a-06_28_2012_nocry&utm_medium=email

 

http://markcrispinmiller.com/2012/06/us-media-blacks-out-italian-court-ruling-that-mmr-vaccine-caused-childs-autism/


 

 

Quote:
Notice to Readers: Thimerosal in Vaccines: A Joint Statement of the American Academy of Pediatrics and the Public Health Service

http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm4826a3.htm

 

autism listed in package insert:

Package Insert From FDA

Diphtheria Toxoids and Pertussis Vaccine Tripedia®

Page 11

‘Adverse events reported during post-approval use of Tripedia vaccine include idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, SIDS, anaphylactic reaction, cellulitis, autism,convulsion/grand mal convulsion, encephalopathy, hypotonia, neuropathy, somnolence and apnea. Events were included in this list because of the seriousness or frequency of reporting.’

emmy526 is online now  
#5 of 7 Old 07-06-2012, 03:00 AM
 
prosciencemum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,672
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)

Isn't this is more of a problem with the press not being interested in science results and spending more time reporting on the latest celebrity break up? 


Mother of two living in UK. Daughter (2007) born in USA, son (2010) born here. I'm pro natural birth, midwife care, breastfeeding, co-sleeping, baby wearing and a keen advocate of cloth diapering. I'm a full time working research scientist (physical sciences) and I'm pro-vaccine.

prosciencemum is online now  
#6 of 7 Old 07-06-2012, 08:34 AM
 
MamaMunchkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 355
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by prosciencemum View Post

Isn't this is more of a problem with the press not being interested in science results and spending more time reporting on the latest celebrity break up? 

 

Free press does not equal tabloid.


Pro rights (vaxes).
MamaMunchkin is offline  
#7 of 7 Old 07-06-2012, 09:36 AM
 
erigeron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,345
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

I'm not sure what you're quoting in the original post, Taximom. It doesn't exactly match the NYT article. Anyway, if they settled civilly then it may not legally be an admission of wrongdoing and they may be able to get away with making statements like that. I'm not a lawyer nor involved in this case, so I don't know about the details.

 

"Trust" is such a broad word and that is such a broad question. Can we BLINDLY trust them? No, we probably shouldn't BLINDLY trust anybody. Can we trust them on some things? Perhaps. And what's the alternative? There are few independent sources of research on drugs because the funding isn't really there, so we are frequently going to be dealing with data that might be biased and companies that should act ethically but may be committing ethics violations. If we don't trust "the system", we're probably going to be trusting someone else who might be just as bad, if not worse.

 

I favor a healthy skepticism.


WOHM to a girl jog.gif (6-11) and a new baby boy stork-boy.gif (2-14) and adjusting to the full-time life and husband being a SAHD. 
erigeron is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Mothering Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off