Gates Foundation Funds Surveillance of Anti-Vaccine Groups - Mothering Forums

Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
#1 of 11 Old 08-29-2012, 01:03 PM - Thread Starter
 
Mirzam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Outside the hive mind
Posts: 7,378
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 36 Post(s)

http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/gates-foundation-funds-surveillance-anti-vaccine-groups

 

[A] $100K grant was recently disbursed to Seth C. Kalichman, professor at the Department of Psychology, University of Connecticut, for "Establishing an Anti-Vaccine Surveillance and Alert System," which intends to "establish an internet-based global monitoring and rapid alert system for finding, analyzing, and counteracting misinformation communication campaigns regarding vaccines to support global immunization efforts." [emphasis added]


Rainbow.giftstillheart.gifsmile.gif

 

"If you find from your own experience that something is a fact and it contradicts what some authority has written down, then you must abandon the authority and base your reasoning on your own findings"~ Leonardo da Vinci

Mirzam is online now  
#2 of 11 Old 09-01-2012, 10:55 AM
Administrator
 
cynthia mosher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Arabia!
Posts: 28,834
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 95 Post(s)

bigeyes.gif


cynthia mosher is online now  
#3 of 11 Old 09-01-2012, 01:17 PM
 
Taximom5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,126
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 34 Post(s)
A grant to a PSYCHOLOGIST to fund propaganda????

That's downright chilling.
Taximom5 is offline  
#4 of 11 Old 09-01-2012, 06:41 PM
 
beckybird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The Shattered Paradigm
Posts: 1,890
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 38 Post(s)

Step by step, they move closer toward a goal. Some believe that goal is honest, pure, humanitarian. I do not believe it for a minute.


 
 
 "Medical propaganda ops are, in the long run, the most dangerous. They appear to be neutral. They wave no political banners. They claim to be science. For these reasons, they can accomplish the goals of overt fascism without arousing suspicion.” — Jon Rappoport
 
 
 
beckybird is online now  
#5 of 11 Old 09-06-2012, 01:37 AM
 
prosciencemum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,732
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 80 Post(s)

Sorry I don't think I understand.

 

 What's the problem with funding someone to have time to correct misinformation posted on websites. If it's wrong shouldn't it be corrected so that the research people do online to make their vaccination choices is more likely to be correct? 

 

 The assumption seems to be that the correction itself will be misinformation, but I'm sure that's not the intention of the Gates Foundation. 


Mother of two living in UK. Daughter (2007) born in USA, son (2010) born here. I'm pro natural birth, midwife care, breastfeeding, co-sleeping, baby wearing and a keen advocate of cloth diapering. I'm a full time working research scientist (physical sciences) and I'm pro-vaccine.

prosciencemum is online now  
#6 of 11 Old 09-06-2012, 04:51 AM
 
rachelsmama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Posts: 1,575
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)

Prosciencemum, the fact that it's being run by psychologists, and that one of their goals is "to support global immunization efforts." makes it sound like accurate information isn't really their goal.   In other words, it sounds suspiciously like a propaganda campaign.

BeckyBird and Bokonon like this.
rachelsmama is offline  
#7 of 11 Old 09-06-2012, 07:22 AM
 
Taximom5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,126
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 34 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by prosciencemum View Post

Sorry I don't think I understand.

 

 What's the problem with funding someone to have time to correct misinformation posted on websites. If it's wrong shouldn't it be corrected so that the research people do online to make their vaccination choices is more likely to be correct? 

 

 The assumption seems to be that the correction itself will be misinformation, but I'm sure that's not the intention of the Gates Foundation. 

 

 

You yourself are making assumptions.  You are assuming that anything criticizing the validity of the current vaccine program is misinformation.

 

Since there is peer-reviewed science on both sides, there is obviously valid reason for debate.

 

The Gates Foundation may have nothing but good intentions, but if those intentions are based on misinformation (like, vaccines are perfectly safe and effective) or on debatable ethics (it's worth killing one child to save 1000), then those good intentions may be paving the road to hell.

 

Mirzam posted something something  very thought-provoking:

"The concept of doing no harm is fundamental to Buddhist teaching, as it is within other Indian religions (Hinduism, Jainism), and is known as ahimsa, literally "the avoidance of violence – himsa." One would not, for example, justify killing an animal in order to save one's own life, which is one reason why Buddhists are vegetarians.

Nor would one justify the killing of one child in order to save 1,000,000, as is often done by regulators in evaluating the costs/benefits of vaccines (which are known on rare occasion to maim or kill) to society as a whole. Simply, do no harm. This principle is no more open to negotiation to a Buddhist than Jesus being the Son of God is open to negotiation to a Christian.

The Dalai Lama himself once said

If you can, help others; if you cannot do that, at least do not harm them. "

 

BeckyBird likes this.
Taximom5 is offline  
#8 of 11 Old 09-06-2012, 07:35 AM
 
kathymuggle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,023
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 150 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by prosciencemum View Post

Sorry I don't think I understand.

 

 What's the problem with funding someone to have time to correct misinformation posted on websites. If it's wrong shouldn't it be corrected so that the research people do online to make their vaccination choices is more likely to be correct? 

 

 

 

 

I think it depends on how it is played out.  If they are reading anit-vax websites so they can compile lists of issues that concern them, and then creating their own webpages or brochure that counteract that info - have at it.

 

If the information is used in any sort of way to invade websites (particularly without disclosing the posters purpose on a website/board) or is being used in any sort of censorship way - then that is less acceptable.


There is a battle of two wolves inside us.  One is good and the other is evil.  The wolf that wins is the one you feed.

 

Book and herb loving mama to 1 preteen and 2 teens (when did that happen?).  We travel, go to school, homeschool, live rurally, eat our veggies, spend too much time...

kathymuggle is online now  
#9 of 11 Old 09-06-2012, 07:40 AM
 
fruitfulmomma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Between the Rockies and a Flat Place
Posts: 4,230
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)

Proscience, where will this 'correct' information be coming from? Are psychologists normally trained to recognize, treat, and prevent the spread of communicable diseases? Are they trained to study the efficacy of vaccines? To recognize and report potential side effects? 

BeckyBird likes this.

fruitfulmomma is online now  
#10 of 11 Old 09-06-2012, 07:53 AM - Thread Starter
 
Mirzam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Outside the hive mind
Posts: 7,378
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 36 Post(s)

It will likely be a smear campaign, because when it comes to debating the science, that is the best they have got.

 

"This writer has no credentials..." "This person is spreading dangerous information that could potentially harm children." "The evidence for the safety and effectiveness of vaccines is overwhelming"

 

Or.....

 

"This author is obviously mentally ill. He wants you to stop vaccinating your children, so that they catch life-threatening diseases."

 

"This person is a conspiracy theorist and is spreading outragious lies about vaccines."

 

How about an open honest debate instead?

BeckyBird likes this.

Rainbow.giftstillheart.gifsmile.gif

 

"If you find from your own experience that something is a fact and it contradicts what some authority has written down, then you must abandon the authority and base your reasoning on your own findings"~ Leonardo da Vinci

Mirzam is online now  
#11 of 11 Old 09-06-2012, 08:00 AM - Thread Starter
 
Mirzam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Outside the hive mind
Posts: 7,378
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 36 Post(s)

I am going to quote Taxi now, from the AB 2109 thread, as an example of what Seth Kalichman's grant will enable more of:

 

 

 

 

Quote:

"A few months ago, Pan met in the Capitol with Schneider. Brian O’Hara, a spokesman for Pan, said the conversation didn’t go well.

“It stalled out at times just because they’re really working off two different sets of data, one that comes from worldwide scientific opinion and the other that comes from a collection of celebrities,” he said."

No, the "other" set of data does not come from a collection of celebrities.  It also comes from worldwide scientific opinion--and it just happens to be the set of data from studies that were not funded by, directed by, interpreted by, tweaked by, and marketed by the vaccine industry itself.

If the only way for Pan to criticize the set of data that shows clear damage from vaccines is to LIE, and say that that data comes from celebrities when it actually from the mainstream scientists, is published in peer-reviewed journals, etc., then that tells us everything we need to know about Assemblyman Richard Pan.  

 

Rainbow.giftstillheart.gifsmile.gif

 

"If you find from your own experience that something is a fact and it contradicts what some authority has written down, then you must abandon the authority and base your reasoning on your own findings"~ Leonardo da Vinci

Mirzam is online now  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Drag and Drop File Upload
Drag files here to attach!
Upload Progress: 0
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Mothering Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off