Adverse Effects of Vaccines: Evidence and Causality - Mothering Forums

Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-18-2012, 09:36 PM - Thread Starter
 
MamaMunchkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 355
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)

Just found this ... published this year (2012) ... sorry if a repeat post/thread (ran a search but didn't see it ...)

 

Adverse Effects of Vaccines: Evidence and Causality

http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=13164

Scroll down for Table of Contents and click to read.

Authors:
Kathleen Stratton, Andrew Ford, Erin Rusch, and Ellen Wright Clayton, Editors;

Committee to Review Adverse Effects of Vaccines; Institute of Medicine

 

Check out Chapter 13 (Concluding Comments) and Appendix D (Causality Conclusion Tables).

... Have yet to peruse it ... but mostly "Inadequate" under the Causality Conclusion column in App. D

 

From Chapter 13 - Concluding Comments (from pages 632-633)

 

Quote:
For the majority of adverse events the committee was asked to examine, the committee concludes that the evidence is inadequate to accept or reject a causal relationship.  Some might interpret that to mean either of the following statements:
- Because the committee did not find convincing evidence that the vaccine does cause the adverse event, the vaccine is safe.
- Because the committee did not find convincing evidence that the vaccine does not cause the adverse event, the vaccine is unsafe.

Neither of these interpretations is correct.  "Inadequate to accept or reject" means just that - inadequate.

Pro rights (vaxes).
MamaMunchkin is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 09-19-2012, 02:28 AM
 
prosciencemum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,828
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 144 Post(s)

Thanks for sharing that reference and the quote from it. :)


Mother of two living in UK. Daughter (2007) born in USA, son (2010) born here. I'm pro natural birth, midwife care, breastfeeding, co-sleeping, baby wearing and a keen advocate of cloth diapering. I'm a full time working research scientist (physical sciences) and I'm pro-vaccine.

prosciencemum is offline  
Old 09-19-2012, 02:37 AM
 
prosciencemum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,828
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 144 Post(s)

Good to see the mainstream are studying the adverse affects of vaccines. People might be interested in the description of the motivation for the review and the main conclusions. 

 

Added: I had to edit it to meet the less than 100 word rules of the forum. [..] indicated text removed. Visit the link for the full text. 

 

 

Quote:
In 1900, for every 1,000 babies born in the United States, 100 would die before their first birthday, often due to infectious diseases. Today, vaccines exist for many viral and bacterial diseases. [..] A key component of the legislation required the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to collaborate with the Institute of Medicine to assess concerns about the safety of vaccines and potential adverse events, especially in children.
 
Adverse Effects of Vaccines reviews the [..] evidence regarding adverse health events associated with specific vaccines [..] For each possible adverse event, the report reviews peer-reviewed primary studies, summarizes their findings, and evaluates the epidemiological, clinical, and biological evidence. [..]

 

 I really wanted to hi-light this last bit: 

 

 

 

Quote:
It finds that while no vaccine is 100 percent safe, very few adverse events are shown to be caused by vaccines. In addition, the evidence shows that vaccines do not cause several conditions. For example, the MMR vaccine is not associated with autism or childhood diabetes. Also, the DTaP vaccine is not associated with diabetes and the influenza vaccine given as a shot does not exacerbate asthma.

Mother of two living in UK. Daughter (2007) born in USA, son (2010) born here. I'm pro natural birth, midwife care, breastfeeding, co-sleeping, baby wearing and a keen advocate of cloth diapering. I'm a full time working research scientist (physical sciences) and I'm pro-vaccine.

prosciencemum is offline  
Old 09-19-2012, 07:37 PM - Thread Starter
 
MamaMunchkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 355
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)

Yes, I'm glad they're studying the adverse effects as well.  However, I  don't think the quote above does justice to what this report offers.

 

I find it helpful that the report offers various degrees of possible causality for a given adverse effect:

"Inadequate", "Favors Rejection", "Favors Acceptance", "Convincingly Supports" - etc

 

As opposed to the binary - yes/no - whether some adverse effect is caused by some vax.


Pro rights (vaxes).
MamaMunchkin is offline  
Old 09-21-2012, 10:32 AM
Administrator
 
cynthia mosher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Arabia!
Posts: 38,755
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 113 Post(s)

prosciencemum - please edit your quote down to 100 words or less and provide a link to the rest for those who wish to read it.


cynthia mosher is offline  
Old 09-21-2012, 12:25 PM
 
prosciencemum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,828
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 144 Post(s)

Done. Sorry - forgot about that rule. :) 


Mother of two living in UK. Daughter (2007) born in USA, son (2010) born here. I'm pro natural birth, midwife care, breastfeeding, co-sleeping, baby wearing and a keen advocate of cloth diapering. I'm a full time working research scientist (physical sciences) and I'm pro-vaccine.

prosciencemum is offline  
Old 09-21-2012, 07:45 PM - Thread Starter
 
MamaMunchkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 355
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)

About the rates of adverse events … from p. 629 ...

Quote:
Determining the rate of specific adverse events following immunization … is challenging.

This could be done using a summary relative risk or absolute risk difference … if there were large population-based studies of the occurrence of the adverse event in unvaccinated individuals … who do not substantially differ from vaccinated on any known, important confounders …

None of these preconditions is fully met for the adverse events reviewed in this report.

 

Still waiting/looking for those studies myself ...


Pro rights (vaxes).
MamaMunchkin is offline  
 
User Tag List

Thread Tools


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off