duck and run, my american friends - duck and run! - Mothering Forums

 
Thread Tools
#1 of 10 Old 11-04-2012, 11:05 PM - Thread Starter
 
threenorns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 47
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

http://vactruth.com/2012/10/22/ama-compulsory-vaccine-trials/

 

 

un-freaking-believable.

threenorns is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
#2 of 10 Old 11-05-2012, 01:27 AM
 
prosciencemum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: United Kingdom (have lived previously in the USA).
Posts: 2,012
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 277 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by threenorns View Post

http://vactruth.com/2012/10/22/ama-compulsory-vaccine-trials/

 

 

un-freaking-believable.

 

Probably because it's not true..... 


Mother of two living in UK. Daughter (2007) born in USA, son (2010) born here. I'm pro natural birth, midwife care, breastfeeding, co-sleeping, baby wearing and a keen advocate of cloth diapering. I'm a full time working research scientist (physical sciences). Vaccines save lives.
prosciencemum is online now  
#3 of 10 Old 11-05-2012, 03:34 AM
 
emmy526's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,765
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)

heres all the references from the OP's article for people to look up facts about the article..

 

 

 

Quote:

 

 

emmy526 is offline  
#4 of 10 Old 11-05-2012, 05:23 AM
 
Mirzam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sophia's Correction
Posts: 8,034
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 273 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by prosciencemum View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by threenorns View Post

http://vactruth.com/2012/10/22/ama-compulsory-vaccine-trials/

 

 

un-freaking-believable.

 

Probably because it's not true..... 

I am sure it is true that the AMA is trying to increase the number of "healthy" people available for vaccine trials. Yes, a person would be able to opt out, but they need to know about the opt out in order to do that. It could be similar to the high school release of name to the military opt out form that you have to actively opt out of otherwise your child can be contacted by military recruiters. Or it could be like a jury summons but with an opt out is teeny tiny print somewhere hidden at the bottom looking official to scare enough people into thinking they have to do this for the good of the people.

 

Frankly, I think the US population won't fall for this one.


Jupiter retrograde in the Crab - Release From Pretending
Mirzam is online now  
#5 of 10 Old 11-05-2012, 07:44 AM - Thread Starter
 
threenorns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 47
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

the ones who will are the ones most vulnerable - the recent immigrants, the new citizens, the ones brought up to believe doctors know everything, and that if the kid's not vaccinated, they can't go to school.

granted, it's a position statement but if the AMA has the confidence to actually put something like this out there, it seems to me they feel they have reasonable grounds to assume it could actually happen.  

 

in a politicial environment where a congressman saying parents ought to be able to seek the death penalty for rebellious children (charles fuqua), dog-fighting should be illegal and you should be allowed to bring your kids (steve king), that animal torture should be allowed (steve king again), that a woman can't get pregnant in cases of "legitimate" rape (and therefore, if she did get pregnant, she must have been consenting on some level), that abortion to save the mother's life should not be allowed (being god's will and all), and where a girl's traumatic locker-room rape was dismissed in public with the comment "some girls rape easy" (roger rivard), do you wonder why the AMA thinks that position statement is worth even considering?

threenorns is offline  
#6 of 10 Old 11-14-2012, 08:18 PM
 
elus0814's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 788
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)

That article stinks of conspiracy theory eyesroll.gif

erigeron likes this.
elus0814 is offline  
#7 of 10 Old 11-14-2012, 10:05 PM
 
beckybird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Somewhere in a Mandelbrot Set
Posts: 2,222
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 166 Post(s)

nevermind....argumentative.


 
 
 "This is the sickest species the world has ever known."
Dr.John Bergman, speaking about the human species.
 
 
 
beckybird is offline  
#8 of 10 Old 11-15-2012, 06:42 AM
 
kathymuggle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,940
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 621 Post(s)

Here is the original source for the article the OP listed:

 

http://virtualmentor.ama-assn.org/2012/01/pfor1-1201.html

 

At this point in time, it really just reads as someone musing about how to solve the problem of too few people enrolling in clinical trials.  It is not policy or anything.  


There is a battle of two wolves inside us.  One is good and the other is evil.  The wolf that wins is the one you feed.

 

Book and herb loving mama to 1 preteen and 2 teens (when did that happen?).  We travel, go to school, homeschool, live rurally, eat our veggies, spend too much time...

kathymuggle is online now  
#9 of 10 Old 11-15-2012, 07:16 AM
 
kathymuggle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,940
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 621 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by threenorns View Post

granted, it's a position statement but if the AMA has the confidence to actually put something like this out there, it seems to me they feel they have reasonable grounds to assume it could actually happen.  

 

 

 

Yeah. Good point….

 

all of the following is speculative:

 

As someone who sees strict school vaccine exemptions as very close to mandatory vaccination, I do not think mandatory (or some softer version of mandatory  - exemptions, opt-outs)  vaccine testing is all that far fetched.  

 

I am not sure the public will go for it, though.

 

The public is fairly willing to accept what they see as tried and true vaccines for young children, and much more hesitant around newer vaccines/vaccines for adults.  There are a number of obvious reasons why.

 

So… while I can see some very pro-vax gung-ho people thinking it is an OK idea, I cannot see the public really going for it (at least not initially).

 

There would also be serious logistical issues.  How do they insist on participation in vaccine trials - link it to being able to work, not getting fines…what?

 

I suspect the tactic they will employ is exactly as they say: - trying to up the rates of voluntary enrolment in trials through public relations.  Some of it will be good and ethical (dissemination of scientific information) and some of it will be manipulative (those who don't enrol in vax trials are selfish!) 

 

 

I also think those who get new vaccines really are in a form of vaccine trials - they just don't see it as such.

 

HPV?  We do not know how long the effectiveness lasts, we do not have a good handle on if there are more reactions to it than one would expect…yet people are still vaxxing their children for it!  

 

They are going to go for public buy-in as opposed to mandatory vaccine trials - it is easier, ethically, and probably cheaper…..


There is a battle of two wolves inside us.  One is good and the other is evil.  The wolf that wins is the one you feed.

 

Book and herb loving mama to 1 preteen and 2 teens (when did that happen?).  We travel, go to school, homeschool, live rurally, eat our veggies, spend too much time...

kathymuggle is online now  
#10 of 10 Old 11-15-2012, 11:04 AM
 
Chicharronita's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: In the Candyland of my Imagination
Posts: 1,620
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by emmy526 View Post

heres all the references from the OP's article for people to look up facts about the article..

 

The Independent – Without Consent: How Drug Companies Exploit Indian ‘Guinea Pigs’

 

 

jaw2.gif

 

"Western pharmaceutical companies have seized on India over the past five years as a testing ground for drugs – making the most of a huge population and loose regulations which help dramatically cut research costs for lucrative products to be sold in the West.[...]The relationship is so exploitative that some believe it represents a new colonialism."

 

 

Many participants said in interviews that they agreed to take part simply because of the recommendation of their doctor. Does "informed consent" even apply to these people who are often uneducated and illiterate?


____________________________________________
Start organizing against vaccine mandate laws. Check NVIC.org for proposed legislation in your state.
No on SB277. Where there is a risk, there MUST be a choice.
Chicharronita is offline  
Reply

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off