IOM finds vaccines safe . . . Again - Page 2 - Mothering Forums
Forum Jump: 
Reply
 
Thread Tools
#31 of 56 Old 01-18-2013, 01:21 PM - Thread Starter
 
Rrrrrachel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,154
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Their primary funding isn't corporate and this report was not corporately funded.
Rrrrrachel is offline  
#32 of 56 Old 01-18-2013, 02:04 PM
 
emma1325's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,275
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rrrrrachel View Post

I'm just curious what funding sources wouldn't be suspect.

 

I'm curious which kind of reporting system would be adequate for determining causation.


Loving mother, Devoted Wife
emma1325 is offline  
#33 of 56 Old 01-18-2013, 02:10 PM - Thread Starter
 
Rrrrrachel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,154
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I don't think a reporting system alone could be adequate.
Rrrrrachel is offline  
#34 of 56 Old 01-18-2013, 02:11 PM
 
emma1325's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,275
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rrrrrachel View Post

I don't think a reporting system alone could be adequate.

 

I see.


Loving mother, Devoted Wife
emma1325 is offline  
#35 of 56 Old 01-18-2013, 02:27 PM - Thread Starter
 
Rrrrrachel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,154
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Reporting systems are designed to raise red flags. That's all. Because they require opting in there's always going to be a lot of bias with the data. You can't use data like that to prove causation. It's nearly impossible to establish proper controls, just for starters.
Rrrrrachel is offline  
#36 of 56 Old 01-18-2013, 03:10 PM
 
chickabiddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,472
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)

There is no place for me to go to VAERS and report that I was fine after my flu shot.


Carseat-checking (CPST) and WAH mama to a twelve-year-old girl.
chickabiddy is online now  
#37 of 56 Old 01-20-2013, 05:50 PM
 
emmy526's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,650
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by chickabiddy View Post

There is no place for me to go to VAERS and report that I was fine after my flu shot.

that's because it's for reporting adverse events associated with receiving a vaccine, not to report there isn't a problem with what vaccine you received.

emmy526 is online now  
#38 of 56 Old 01-20-2013, 05:50 PM
 
emmy526's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,650
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)

Institute of Medicine adverse reactions report admits MMR vaccines cause measles, seizures, anaphylaxis and other health problems



Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/033447_Institute_of_Medicine_vaccines.html#ixzz2IZRFEmx5
Mirzam and BeckyBird like this.
emmy526 is online now  
#39 of 56 Old 01-20-2013, 05:58 PM - Thread Starter
 
Rrrrrachel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,154
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Uh, yes.  Vaccinations can cause serious adverse events.  This is not news.

Rrrrrachel is offline  
#40 of 56 Old 01-20-2013, 06:04 PM
 
chickabiddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,472
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by emmy526 View Post

that's because it's for reporting adverse events associated with receiving a vaccine, not to report there isn't a problem with what vaccine you received.

 

Right, I actually understand that, since it's named Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System.  The point is that it is not a comprehensive database but a self-selected, self-reported collection of claims.


Carseat-checking (CPST) and WAH mama to a twelve-year-old girl.
chickabiddy is online now  
#41 of 56 Old 01-21-2013, 07:57 AM
 
Turquesa's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,050
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rrrrrachel View Post

Their primary funding isn't corporate and this report was not corporately funded.

There were no controls in place to ensure that the 40 studies in question were all independent.

In God we trust; all others must show data. selectivevax.gifsurf.gifteapot2.GIFintactivist.gif
Turquesa is offline  
#42 of 56 Old 01-21-2013, 08:02 AM
 
Turquesa's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,050
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
By the way, IoM looked at existing research and said that they couldn't find evidence that the current vaccine schedule is NOT safe.

Disingenuous media spin not withstanding, that really, really is different from saying "vaccines are safe."

Also, I can't link it from here, but the 2011 IoM report did not say that vaccines are safe. If you look at page 541, they authors go out of it's way to say that they are not declaring that vaccines are safe.
Mirzam, rachelsmama and BeckyBird like this.

In God we trust; all others must show data. selectivevax.gifsurf.gifteapot2.GIFintactivist.gif
Turquesa is offline  
#43 of 56 Old 01-21-2013, 08:05 AM - Thread Starter
 
Rrrrrachel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,154
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
That's a very good point. There is a difference between saying no evidence of harm and that they are for sure safe. Very careless of me.
Rrrrrachel is offline  
#44 of 56 Old 01-21-2013, 08:09 AM
 
Turquesa's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,050
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by chickabiddy View Post

Right, I actually understand that, since it's named Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System.  The point is that it is not a comprehensive database but a self-selected, self-reported collection of claims.

Actually, if you'll permit me one nitpick, at least 83% of VAERS reports come from vaccine manufacturers and health care professionals, per the VAERS FAQ page.

Maybe you weren't implying otherwise, but I just want to make sure that we're clear that most of those reports aren't individual laypeople making submissions.
littlest birds and BeckyBird like this.

In God we trust; all others must show data. selectivevax.gifsurf.gifteapot2.GIFintactivist.gif
Turquesa is offline  
#45 of 56 Old 01-21-2013, 06:24 PM
 
chickabiddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,472
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)

I didn't know the exact figure, but I did know many reports come from medical/pharma professionals.  Still, the people who report, in whatever capacity, have already determined that they believe a vax reaction occurred.  VAERS is a completely self-selected database.  It is valuable in many ways, but it is not something from which causation can be derived.  (Which I realize you weren't claiming, but there was discussion of this upthread.)

Turquesa likes this.

Carseat-checking (CPST) and WAH mama to a twelve-year-old girl.
chickabiddy is online now  
#46 of 56 Old 01-21-2013, 06:52 PM
 
littlest birds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: a dream-filled fixer-upper
Posts: 2,952
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Since we have an extreme pro-vax bias in our society and among health professionals, and the VAERS data is self-selected, it would be expected to under report problems rather than over report them.  I'm not strongly pro- or anti- personally but am very skeptical about the completeness of our information. 

 

Those who believe vaccines are mostly safe are likely to overlook them as causative of anything unless there is foghorn blasting over the diagnosis.  That reaction would be severe and 100% obvious behaving 100% the way they expect and they can't think of any other possible cause.  I'm concerned about the quieter effects, the ones that look minor, the ones that involve mystery syndromes without known causes.

 

If vaccines contribute to later autoimmune problems that would not show up at all in VAERS as adverse reactions--we do not know how to identify causation at all for autoimmune disorders.  I do have a child on the autism spectrum and I do not blame the vaccines he received.  I remain skeptical about the wisdom of using vaccines.  They seem a clever trick--amazing-- but with some side effects beyond our ability to understand.

 

This study doesn't seem to say anything new at all.  If there are things we haven't been evaluating, we still aren't evaluating them.  If there are things we don't yet understand and can't measure, then they still aren't there, are they?


ME&treehugger.gifHE... loving our: wild.gifdd(18) ~~violin.gifds(13) read.gifdd(13)~~ peace.gifdd(10)
 
 

littlest birds is offline  
#47 of 56 Old 01-22-2013, 04:41 AM - Thread Starter
 
Rrrrrachel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,154
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Vaers data both under and over reports. Fortunately it is not our only method of investigating vaccine safety and adverse events.

This is a review, not original research. So by its nature it's "nothing new." Like the various cochrane reviews it reviews and examines the entire body of research on a topic, which is extremely valuable IMO.
prosciencemum likes this.
Rrrrrachel is offline  
#48 of 56 Old 01-22-2013, 05:09 PM
 
littlest birds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: a dream-filled fixer-upper
Posts: 2,952
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

I think the body of research has some value because it proves that certain types of negative reactions that we expect are fairly infrequent.  That is good to know.  It would obviously be tragic if there were lots of acute reactions of the type they were measuring and for us to have ignored them because we weren't keeping track enough to see the prevalence.

 

It is also important to acknowledge what is being completely ignored as impractical to measure or impossible to isolate in ALL of the studies.  If the immune system is altered by vaccines in the long term, we have no idea.  We don't even have a way to begin measuring that.  We know nothing about things like this and right now we don't seem equipped to change that.  All I am saying is we should acknowledge there is a substantial body of things that we don't know that may be very, very important.  A study like this should not be interpreted to apply to anything except what it has directly studied. 

 

To say vaccine were proven safe here is a misinterpretation of the information.  That is not a logical conclusion.

Marnica likes this.

ME&treehugger.gifHE... loving our: wild.gifdd(18) ~~violin.gifds(13) read.gifdd(13)~~ peace.gifdd(10)
 
 

littlest birds is offline  
#49 of 56 Old 01-22-2013, 05:13 PM - Thread Starter
 
Rrrrrachel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,154
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Already been pointed out and acknowledged that it should of said they found no evidence of harm.
Rrrrrachel is offline  
#50 of 56 Old 01-23-2013, 06:38 AM
 
emma1325's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,275
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rrrrrachel View Post

Already been pointed out and acknowledged that it should of said they found no evidence of harm.

 

I'm assuming you meant should have said?

Sorry, I'm a nitpicker I guess.  lol


Loving mother, Devoted Wife
emma1325 is offline  
#51 of 56 Old 01-23-2013, 09:29 AM - Thread Starter
 
Rrrrrachel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,154
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
You'll get past it somehow I'm sure.
Rrrrrachel is offline  
#52 of 56 Old 01-25-2013, 07:25 AM
 
emma1325's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,275
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Maybe, maybe not. Who knows? smile.gif

Loving mother, Devoted Wife
emma1325 is offline  
#53 of 56 Old 01-25-2013, 01:21 PM
 
Jennyanydots's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,380
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rrrrrachel View Post

That's a very good point. There is a difference between saying no evidence of harm and that they are for sure safe. Very careless of me.
Yes. Or deliberately manipulative. smile.gif
BeckyBird likes this.

chicken3.gif mama to two teens and two tots partners.gif madly in love with DP guitar.gif

Jennyanydots is offline  
#54 of 56 Old 01-25-2013, 01:47 PM - Thread Starter
 
Rrrrrachel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,154
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
That's pretty rude, Jenny.
Rrrrrachel is offline  
#55 of 56 Old 01-26-2013, 01:18 AM
 
Jennyanydots's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,380
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rrrrrachel View Post

That's pretty rude, Jenny.
What, calling you out for your obvious agenda?

I guess I missed the part in the UA where it says you can be as rude and smug as you like and everyone else has to play nice. smile.gif

chicken3.gif mama to two teens and two tots partners.gif madly in love with DP guitar.gif

Jennyanydots is offline  
#56 of 56 Old 01-26-2013, 06:43 AM
Administrator
 
cynthia mosher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: An Arabian kingdom far far away
Posts: 28,860
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 83 Post(s)

Warning - personal accusations and attacks will get you removed from the discussion. Please review our guidelines for posting in this forum before you post again. 

 

 


cynthia mosher is online now  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Drag and Drop File Upload
Drag files here to attach!
Upload Progress: 0
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Mothering Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off