Competing Interests in Medical Research - Mothering Forums

Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
#1 of 5 Old 01-26-2013, 08:17 AM - Thread Starter
 
Turquesa's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,059
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 30 Post(s)
Remember that when conducting vaccine-related research, regardless of the perspective, it's always a good idea to track competing interests and funding sources.

Conflicts of interest are not a "conspiracy theory." They are actually present in the majority of studies, and they do indeed affect research outcomes.

http://www.cochrane.org/features/industry-sponsorship-and-research-outcome

http://www.bmj.com/content/325/7358/249

http://ccnmtl.columbia.edu/projects/rcr/rcr_conflicts/foundation/

Outdated but still a great analysis:

http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/archive/coi/angell.htm

I find it helpful to track down the CVs or other biographical information on a study's authors. If you want to cut straight to the chase, do a search on somebody's name along with the name of a drug company, (e.g. Offit, Merck). For example, here is a bio for Dr. William Schaffner, a Vanderbilt University vaccine researcher who is quoted in an ABC story as saying that states with exemptions need to "tighten up" and take away the right to informed consent:

http://www.reachmd.com/xmradioguest.aspx?pid=2948

Below is a link to the BMJs policy on declaring competing interests. This can be a useful guide on the types of competing interests that can affect research.

http://www.bmj.com/about-bmj/resources-reviewers/competing-interests

When pediatricians and public health officials whine to the media about us bad widda mommies using the Internet, they'd do well to know that this is the kind of stuff that we're reading. winky.gif

Good luck with your research!
Marnica and kathymuggle like this.

In God we trust; all others must show data. selectivevax.gifsurf.gifteapot2.GIFintactivist.gif
Turquesa is offline  
#2 of 5 Old 01-28-2013, 01:33 AM
 
prosciencemum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,735
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 87 Post(s)

Turquesa - really good point.

 

Important to remember that funding does not immediately mean a conflict of interest - but it can be used as a flag to apply more skeptical reading to what you're reading. 

 

It is also very important to do some background research on sources when you read vaccine information online. 

 

The WHO has a list of things to look for in websites giving advice on vaccination: http://www.who.int/vaccine_safety/good_vs_sites/en/


Mother of two living in UK. Daughter (2007) born in USA, son (2010) born here. I'm pro natural birth, midwife care, breastfeeding, co-sleeping, baby wearing and a keen advocate of cloth diapering. I'm a full time working research scientist (physical sciences) and I'm pro-vaccine.

prosciencemum is online now  
#3 of 5 Old 01-28-2013, 08:00 PM - Thread Starter
 
Turquesa's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,059
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 30 Post(s)

Hmm. As delineated in the links above, conflicting funding does automatically and by definition constitute a competing interest.  Now if you say that it doesn't necessarily mean that study is worth dismissing or that a competing interest has been exploited, then you and I are in agreement.  However, the research does indicate that in most cases, competing interests have a tainting impact on data. In Dr. Angell's words,

 

Quote:

 

";;;there is nothing 'potential' about a conflict of interest. Either it exists or it doesn’t. What is potential is whether a conflict leads to bad research."

 

In fact, speaking broadly of medical research, sometimes the concern isn't over the data you're seeing so much as the data hidden from the public: http://www.salon.com/2013/01/27/bad_pharma_drug_research_riddled_with_half_truths_omissions_lies/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=pulsenews

 

 

Quote:

Because researchers are free to bury any result they please, patients are exposed to harm on a staggering scale throughout the whole of medicine, from research to practice. Doctors can have no idea about the true effects of the treatments they give.

 

It's a crying shame that the industry behaves in such an unethical and untrustworthy manner.  But I see a glimmer of hope with all of the physicians and other critics who have the courage and integrity to blow the whistle.

 

Thank you for posting the WHO link. That list is a tall order for any website, and the anti-vax and "skeptic" sites are nowhere close to fulfilling it.  Given that it's a rare find, it's probably best for parents to hone an ability to cross-reference everything they read, including tracking down primary sources, identifying competing interests, and reading conflicting perspectives.


In God we trust; all others must show data. selectivevax.gifsurf.gifteapot2.GIFintactivist.gif
Turquesa is offline  
#4 of 5 Old 01-30-2013, 04:37 PM
 
Pookietooth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 5,059
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Turquesa View Post
It's a crying shame that the industry behaves in such an unethical and untrustworthy manner.  But I see a glimmer of hope with all of the physicians and other critics who have the courage and integrity to blow the whistle.

 

Thank you for posting the WHO link. That list is a tall order for any website, and the anti-vax and "skeptic" sites are nowhere close to fulfilling it.  Given that it's a rare find, it's probably best for parents to hone an ability to cross-reference everything they read, including tracking down primary sources, identifying competing interests, and reading conflicting perspectives.

Thanks for noting that one has to cross-reference things. I am glad you see hope in some that the medical industry may be changing, although I don't see it yet. The whole system is built upon lies, unfortunately. 


Jen 47 DS C 2/03  angel.gif04/29/08/ DD S 10/28/09 DH Bill '97.

mighty-mama and her sister Kundalini-Mamacandle.gif

Pookietooth is offline  
#5 of 5 Old 03-27-2013, 04:02 PM - Thread Starter
 
Turquesa's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,059
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 30 Post(s)

I'm bumping this up because I found some other great resources on this topic.

 

1. Dollars for Docs is a project of ProPublica, a non-profit organization of journalists working in the public interests.  When you're screening vaccine research for conflicts of interests, you may scan the database for doctors who have a history of accepting drug company payments for speaking, consulting, meals, travel, etc.  http://projects.propublica.org/docdollars/

 

It's also a great way to check on your own provider.  :wink  Keep in mind, however, that medical researchers aren't always doctors.  Sometimes they are epidemiologists, microbiologists, etc., so even if they have conflicts of interests, they won't appear in Dollars for Docs.

 

2. Here is a recent British Medical Journal expose about corruption in the pharmaceutical industry, which is in charge of researching vaccines before they go to market and mandate.  http://www.cochrane.dk/research/corporatecrime/Corporate-crime-long-version.pdf

 

Happy researching!













 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


In God we trust; all others must show data. selectivevax.gifsurf.gifteapot2.GIFintactivist.gif
Turquesa is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Drag and Drop File Upload
Drag files here to attach!
Upload Progress: 0
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Mothering Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off