Great resource on vaccine science - Mothering Forums
Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
#1 of 7 Old 02-16-2013, 12:00 PM - Thread Starter
 
Rrrrrachel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,154
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
This is from Australia but relevant and useful for anyone interested in vaccines. It addresses a lot of common concerns and is very well footnoted, so it's a good introduction as well as putting you in a good position to explore more deeply if you wish.

http://www.science.org.au/policy/documents/AAS_Immunisation_FINAL_LR_v3.pdf
prosciencemum likes this.
Rrrrrachel is offline  
#2 of 7 Old 02-16-2013, 04:59 PM
 
Mirzam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Outside the hive mind
Posts: 7,302
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)

For those interested in an alternative view, here is Dr Viera Scheibner PhD's excellent rebuttal. It is 52 pages long but well worth reading and I recommend printing it our for your vaccine research files. You can download the pdf, here.

 

A critique of the 16-page Australian pro-vaccine booklet entitled "The Science of Immunisation: Questions and Answers"

 

 

 

Quote:

 

The science of immunisation? 

In November of 2012, there was a document* Published by the Australian Academy of Science, Canberra.  This brochure was so fraught with misinformation and propaganda, that it must be addressed point by point.

 

 

MissCee likes this.

Rainbow.giftstillheart.gifsmile.gif

 

"If you find from your own experience that something is a fact and it contradicts what some authority has written down, then you must abandon the authority and base your reasoning on your own findings"~ Leonardo da Vinci

Mirzam is online now  
#3 of 7 Old 02-16-2013, 05:20 PM - Thread Starter
 
Rrrrrachel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,154
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I tried to read it, but I couldn't get past the way she put vaccine preventable diseases in quotation marks.
Rrrrrachel is offline  
#4 of 7 Old 02-16-2013, 05:36 PM
 
Mirzam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Outside the hive mind
Posts: 7,302
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rrrrrachel View Post

I tried to read it, but I couldn't get past the way she put vaccine preventable diseases in quotation marks.

Well, there you have it, you are unable to post a valid opinion because you won't read the rebuttal. As even you have admitted in the many a post, vaccines are not 100% effective and vaccinated individuals do get the diseases for which they are vaccinated.


Rainbow.giftstillheart.gifsmile.gif

 

"If you find from your own experience that something is a fact and it contradicts what some authority has written down, then you must abandon the authority and base your reasoning on your own findings"~ Leonardo da Vinci

Mirzam is online now  
#5 of 7 Old 02-17-2013, 03:34 AM - Thread Starter
 
Rrrrrachel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,154
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
And I got a little further than I admitted. At least to the part where she cited all that cutting edge research from 1901 and 1950. It was pretty apparent to me at that point that I didn't really need to critique it further, people were capable of deciding for themselves.

That's the thing, I don't feel the need to critique every antivax piece out there. They're not threatening to me. It's just annoying not to be able to post one thing without it being called propaganda.
Rrrrrachel is offline  
#6 of 7 Old 02-17-2013, 06:57 AM
 
Mirzam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Outside the hive mind
Posts: 7,302
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rrrrrachel View Post

This forum isn't for rebuttals.

 

No it is for information which is what I provided. 

 

Oh and just because the research is old doesn't invalidate it. Has any of that research been reproduced and found to be incorrect? Personally, I take notice of the older research because it tends to be more "pure' and it is less likely to have been corrupted by bias and funding bias. Not all of though, for example, the Eli Lily study on thirmerosal safety, now that was a doozy which still used today by vaccine advocates to prove thirmerosal is safe.

 

I don't know why you are feeling threatened you seem to be turning this into a debate all by yourself, all I did was post information for people that they can use in their information gathering. Can't we let them decide for themselves. 


Rainbow.giftstillheart.gifsmile.gif

 

"If you find from your own experience that something is a fact and it contradicts what some authority has written down, then you must abandon the authority and base your reasoning on your own findings"~ Leonardo da Vinci

Mirzam is online now  
#7 of 7 Old 02-20-2013, 09:26 AM
 
IdentityCrisisMama's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 10,630
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 89 Post(s)

Ok, I cleaned up this thread a little. I think a rebuttal related to the article Rrrrachel linked could be helpful to those new to vaccine research. Members wishing to really debate either of these two sources are absolutely welcome to take that topic over to Vaccine Discussion and Debate. You can link the thread here so that new members can follow it over if they're interested. 


Mama to DD September 2001 and DD April 2011 *Winner for most typos* eat.gif
IdentityCrisisMama is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Drag and Drop File Upload
Drag files here to attach!
Upload Progress: 0
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Mothering Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off