Banned Wakefield Films From British TV Emerge on Youtube After Nearly a Decade - Mothering Forums

Forum Jump: 
Thread Tools
#1 of 3 Old 02-22-2013, 01:22 AM - Thread Starter
MissCee's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 83
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Not sure if this has been posted before or if this is the right thread, but wanted to share for those who may be interested! :) Here's a link to the article it was put on too:


Cecillia | 22 | Love Jesus | Happily Married | WTT #2: 2015

Breastfeeding, Babywearing, Gentle Parenting crunchy momma to an unvaxxed intact sweet boy.

novaxnocirc.gif goorganic.jpg



MissCee is offline  
#2 of 3 Old 02-22-2013, 02:31 AM
prosciencemum's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,735
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 87 Post(s)

I don't find any proof it was banned, it just seems to have been a very unsuccessful TV drama made by Channel 5 (a small channel in the UK). 


This article from 2003 talks about the poor viewer figures it got, despite a lot of press coverage at the time about how controversial it was:




Hear the Silence lost out to programming on all four terrestrial channels, including Channel 4's extreme science series, BodyShock, which continued to pull in viewers with a documentary about feral children.



Hugh Bonneville wasn't a big star until Downton Abbey. :)


PS. Did you know he's a Patron of "Medical Emergency Relief International" (


Thy don't appear to be against vaccines (Vaccinated 202,036 children among other things: 

Mother of two living in UK. Daughter (2007) born in USA, son (2010) born here. I'm pro natural birth, midwife care, breastfeeding, co-sleeping, baby wearing and a keen advocate of cloth diapering. I'm a full time working research scientist (physical sciences) and I'm pro-vaccine.

prosciencemum is online now  
#3 of 3 Old 02-22-2013, 06:22 AM
chickabiddy's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,485
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)

If a network decides a film is uninteresting or poorly done and therefore chooses not to air it, that's not the same as "banning" or "suppressing".  Where's the proof that it was the latter and not the former?


Even the Age of Autism article agrees "Exactly how the corporate pharmaceutical pressure was exerted within the BBC, is difficult to discern." Meaning that they have no proof that there was anything in play except stuff no one really wanted to watch.

Carseat-checking (CPST) and WAH mama to a twelve-year-old girl.
chickabiddy is online now  

Quick Reply
Drag and Drop File Upload
Drag files here to attach!
Upload Progress: 0

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Mothering Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off