Vaccines, Autism & Epidemiology - A Call for Better Science - Mothering Forums

 
Thread Tools
#1 of 6 Old 03-04-2013, 09:04 AM - Thread Starter
 
Mirzam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sophia's Correction
Posts: 8,589
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 476 Post(s)

Here is an interesting article by someone who clearly isn't anit-vax and would prefer there not to be a link be a link between vaccines and autism, but feels that to date the epidemiological studies have not shown that to be the case.

 

 

 

 

Quote:

[I] am not saying I believe autism and vaccinations share a relationship with one another, nor am I saying I believe they do not. What I’m trying to bring light to is the fact that the science which has been used to address this question, in my perception, has been woefully inadequate in its capacity to answer it. We need more lab-based studies, ones which look at exposure and then gauge, not only changes in animal behavior, but changes in brain development. And studies, I would stress, which comprise scientists who are well-trained and offer reliable results; not the slapdash methodology which comes from inexperience. The benefit of animal studies is the reduction of variables which must be accounted for, offering the researcher a better means to judge cause and effect in minute detail. Epidemiology offers no such benefit.

http://insolemexumbra.wordpress.com/2013/03/03/vaccines-autism-epidemiology-a-call-for-better-science/

BeckyBird likes this.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Humanity is a species endangered by its beliefs, and most of all, its religious illusion of superiority.. ~ John Lamb Lash
Mirzam is online now  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
#2 of 6 Old 03-04-2013, 10:23 AM
 
Rrrrrachel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,145
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
I completely agree with what he says here.
Quote:
Well, you can just call me a scientific stickler I guess, because to me epidemiological studies generally don’t answer questions but raise them and are meant to lead lab-based science in the directions it needs to go to answer those questions.

What I'm not sure I agree with is a great need for lab studies on a question that epidemiological studies haven't raised in the first place.
Rrrrrachel is offline  
#3 of 6 Old 03-04-2013, 10:26 AM
 
Rrrrrachel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,145
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Ooh and this.
Quote:
Some researchers say that a hypothesis test can have one of two outcomes: you accept the null hypothesis or you reject the null hypothesis. Many statisticians, however, take issue with the notion of ‘accepting the null hypothesis.’ Instead, they say: you reject the null hypothesis or you fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Man after my own heart.
Rrrrrachel is offline  
#4 of 6 Old 03-04-2013, 01:27 PM
 
sciencemum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: United Kingdom (have lived previously in the USA).
Posts: 2,552
Mentioned: 55 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 743 Post(s)
Interesting reading. She makes some good points. Thanks for sharing Mirzam.

PS. Rrrrrachel - the writer is called Emily. Seems to be a "woman after your own heart". smile.gif

Mother of two living in UK. Daughter (2007) born in USA, son (2010) born here. I'm pro natural birth, midwife care, breastfeeding, co-sleeping, baby wearing and a keen advocate of cloth diapering. I'm a full time working research scientist (physical sciences). Vaccines save lives.
sciencemum is offline  
#5 of 6 Old 03-04-2013, 01:39 PM
 
Rrrrrachel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,145
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Oh. Sorry. Gender bias.
Rrrrrachel is offline  
#6 of 6 Old 03-04-2013, 01:42 PM
 
sciencemum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: United Kingdom (have lived previously in the USA).
Posts: 2,552
Mentioned: 55 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 743 Post(s)
No worries. We all suffer from that.

Mother of two living in UK. Daughter (2007) born in USA, son (2010) born here. I'm pro natural birth, midwife care, breastfeeding, co-sleeping, baby wearing and a keen advocate of cloth diapering. I'm a full time working research scientist (physical sciences). Vaccines save lives.
sciencemum is offline  
Reply


User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Online Users: 13,530

56 members and 13,474 guests
alada , AllTomorrowsParties , AlmostJenny , AMG , bananabee , blessedwithboys , blue owl , bluefaery , boomer78 , Cherry_Blossom , Cpps Girl Gamer Ally , crazyms , Dakotacakes , Deborah , Dmbobbit , happyhats , Hillarybobillary , Iron Princess , j10k , kathymuggle , lilgreen , LiLStar , Linda on the move , maiajay , mariamadly , Mirzam , missmason , MommatoGray , moominmamma , Mylie , Narawen , nemodori2084 , newmamalizzy , oaksie68 , Oceanage , philomom , Ragana , RollerCoasterMama , RosemaryV , rubelin , samaxtics , sarafl , scsigrl , shantimama , siennaflower , stephalittle , SweetSilver , TweedleZee , verticalscope , zebra15
Most users ever online was 449,755, 06-25-2014 at 12:21 PM.