Vaccine Injury Anecdotes are No Joke - Mothering Forums

Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-18-2013, 02:46 PM - Thread Starter
 
Mirzam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Resistance Free Earth
Posts: 7,617
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 135 Post(s)

Another great article from MDC member Sandy Gottstein.

 

http://www.vaccinationnews.com/2013-4-17-vaccine-injury-anecdotes-GottsteinS

 

 

 

 

Quote:

Knock-Knock

Who’s there? 

Vaccine-Injury Anecdotes!

Guess there’s nobody at the door!

 

Q. How many anecdotes does it take to screw in a light bulb?

A. You can never have enough.

 

Anecdotes are the neutrinos of the vaccine-injury world.  No matter how many of them there are, they will always go unnoticed.


t
 
"There are only two mistakes you can make in the search for the Truth. Not starting, and not going all the way." ~ Mark Passio
Mirzam is online now  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 05-23-2013, 10:44 PM
 
tracyamber's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 3,783
Mentioned: 214 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 72 Post(s)

thumb.gif

tracyamber is offline  
Old 05-24-2013, 06:23 AM
 
kathymuggle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,244
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 235 Post(s)

That was a great article.

 

Several months ago, numerous posters asked where the "only 10% of adverse reactions are reported" stat cam from - and this article does give something of an answer:

 

"Under-reporting is understood to be a limitation of a passive reporting system like VAERS. In light of the fact that a vaccine manufacturer reported a 2% rate and that David Kessler, former FDA head, reported that one study found that only 1% of evenserious adverse events were reported to the agency,  proposing a reporting rate of 10% might be considered “conservative”, i.e., a low-ball estimate.  Under such a “conservative” scenario, 3,825,400 possible adverse vaccine-associated reactions could be projected.  That’s a lot of nothing."


There is a battle of two wolves inside us.  One is good and the other is evil.  The wolf that wins is the one you feed.

 

Book and herb loving mama to 1 preteen and 2 teens (when did that happen?).  We travel, go to school, homeschool, live rurally, eat our veggies, spend too much time...

kathymuggle is online now  
Old 05-24-2013, 07:21 AM
 
Rrrrrachel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,145
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Fortunately vaers is not the only source for estimates on frequency of adverse events.
Rrrrrachel is offline  
Old 05-27-2013, 12:45 PM
 
Taximom5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,317
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 97 Post(s)

It's a very sad state of affairs when all we have are a few severely flawed sources for estimating frequency of adverse reactions to vaccines--VAERS, industry studies that were fixed to downplay adverse reactions, and post-marketing surveillance data that has likewise been fixed.  In addition, the vaccine industry has put a lot of time and money into training doctors to baasically FAIL to recognize and therefore report serious vaccine reactions.

Taximom5 is offline  
 
User Tag List

Thread Tools


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off