Facts and Data, Please: Tort Claims for Vaccine Injury - Mothering Forums

Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
#1 of 9 Old 07-17-2013, 09:00 PM - Thread Starter
 
Turquesa's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,069
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 33 Post(s)
In 1986, the U.S. Congress established a tax-payer funded system for compensating victims of vaccine injury, ("collateral damage" in the War on Disease, if you will). The move came at the lobbying of drug companies who wanted to be free of liability and who basically threatened to pull out of vaccine manufacturing if this measure didn't pass. Now, victims of vaccine injury have three years to file a claim in the Vaccine Injury Compensation Court (VICP). There is no peer jury and no independent judge, just government agents representing government interests.

Fast forward to today. The topic frequently comes up on MDC when somebody mentions that vaccines are a liability-free product. Someone else corrects the person and says that VICP can be bypassed and the plaintiff can opt for a traditional tort claim.

Here are my questions. Wherever possible, please reply with good, solid, supporting links, (e.g. not just opinionated personal blog posts). If I get super curious about something, don't be surprised if I ask you to cough up a link or two. blowkiss.gif

1. Under what specific circumstances could a plaintiff proceed with a tort claim against a vaccine manufacturer, (i.e. sue the manufacturer directly)? For example, would the plaintiff have to start with VICP first?

2. How many times have vaccine manufacturers been directly sued since 1986? How many of these cases have ruled in favor of the plaintiff?

3. Since 1986, how much money have vaccine manufacturers lost to settling or directly compensating for cases of vaccine injury?

4. Nationwide, how many attorneys handle non-VICP, vaccine-related tort claims?
applejuice, MissCee and Taximom5 like this.

In God we trust; all others must show data. selectivevax.gifsurf.gifteapot2.GIFintactivist.gif
Turquesa is offline  
#2 of 9 Old 07-17-2013, 09:09 PM
 
fruitfulmomma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Between the Rockies and a Flat Place
Posts: 4,243
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)

lurk.gif

applejuice likes this.
fruitfulmomma is online now  
#3 of 9 Old 07-19-2013, 09:26 PM - Thread Starter
 
Turquesa's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,069
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 33 Post(s)
I don't foresee any answers soon, but would you all do me a favor and remember this thread?

The next time somebody claims that vaccine package inserts are full of exaggerated or made-up reactions because manufacturers fear that someone will bypass VICP and sue them, let's link them to this thread.
applejuice and Taximom5 like this.

In God we trust; all others must show data. selectivevax.gifsurf.gifteapot2.GIFintactivist.gif
Turquesa is offline  
#4 of 9 Old 12-27-2013, 09:27 PM - Thread Starter
 
Turquesa's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,069
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 33 Post(s)
I hope you're all OK with my bumping this up. Since we have some new regulars in the forum, maybe someone can help provide answers to the OP.

In God we trust; all others must show data. selectivevax.gifsurf.gifteapot2.GIFintactivist.gif
Turquesa is offline  
#5 of 9 Old 12-28-2013, 07:43 PM
 
Katc8910's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 246
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
My husband is an attorney (product liability actually) and told me that claims against vaccine manufacturers are barred by federal statute. You cannot bring them in state or federal court. The only recourse is to file a claim with the VICP and you have no right to appeal the determination.
applejuice likes this.

treehugger.gifgoorganic.jpggd.giftriadadopt.jpgfamilybed1.gif

Katc8910 is online now  
#6 of 9 Old 12-29-2013, 07:24 AM
 
chknlovr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 80
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katc8910 View Post

My husband is an attorney (product liability actually) and told me that claims against vaccine manufacturers are barred by federal statute. You cannot bring them in state or federal court. The only recourse is to file a claim with the VICP and you have no right to appeal the determination.

That is not correct.  A petitioner can file a civil suit if they lose in the vaccine court.

 

Even the anti-vax NVIC site says so.  http://www.nvic.org/injury-compensation.aspx

chknlovr is offline  
#7 of 9 Old 12-29-2013, 08:07 AM
 
Katc8910's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 246
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
You are incorrect. But answer could have been clearer.

There is a technical right of appeal but the important point is that you never get the opportunity to bring a traditional lawsuit for damages no matter what happens at the VICP or on appeal.

A federal law that controls all courts prohibits any lawsuit for damages.

Federal statute 42 USC SEC.300aa-11(a(2a)) - "No person may bring a civil action for damages in an amount greater than $1,000 or in an unspecified amount against a vaccine administrator or manufacturer in a state or federal court for damages arising from a vaccine related injury or death."

You must go to VICP (unless you want less than $1,000) and when there is a ruling, you can appeal the ruling by arguing that there was an error. However, even if the appeal court says that you are right, you go back to the VICP. You do not get to go to a regular court.
applejuice, Turquesa and BeckyBird like this.

treehugger.gifgoorganic.jpggd.giftriadadopt.jpgfamilybed1.gif

Katc8910 is online now  
#8 of 9 Old 12-30-2013, 06:59 PM - Thread Starter
 
Turquesa's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,069
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 33 Post(s)
Thanks for the info, Katc. That's what I had always thought.

Various regulars on this forum have claimed otherwise. They are most likely getting their information from someone who isn't even a lawyer: Paul Offit. http://content.healthaffairs.org/content/24/3/622.full

"Unfortunately, three important weaknesses in the NVICP discourage vaccine makers. First, if dissatisfied with the outcome, people can always opt out of the NVICP and take their case to a jury. "

Can your DH confirm the accuracy of that statement?

Offit has a citation number at the end of the paragraph, but none of the cited articles seem to pertain to the claim that NVICP plaintiffs may appeal to a jury, nor do I see any evidence of the 300 pending cases that he mentions.

The thinking that we should dismiss vaccine package insert information over all of this makes no sense. You'd have to assume that drug companies are inventing non-existent side effects to protect themselves JUST IN CASE somebody experiences one after a receiving a vaccine, files a claim through Vaccine Court, loses the claim, appeals through the traditional tort system, and wins. Then you'd have to assume that all of this occurred so frequently that vaccine manufacturers are on their knees out of fear of getting directly sued by parents and adult vaccine recipients.

The whole scenario sounds pretty absurd and far-fetched to me, which makes me wonder if package insert information of side effects may be a little more accurate than we think.
applejuice, BeckyBird and Taximom5 like this.

In God we trust; all others must show data. selectivevax.gifsurf.gifteapot2.GIFintactivist.gif
Turquesa is offline  
#9 of 9 Old 01-03-2014, 01:15 PM
 
Katc8910's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 246
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I disagree with what Offit is saying. I didn't quote the whole statue, but another portion of it says that the courts must dismiss any suit against a pharmaceutical manufacturer if the lawsuit is for more than $1,000. The comment from Offit does not provide any citations for cases that would allow my DH to look them up. DH has looked himself and found no cases where the courts have disregarded the statute. Any court that ignored the statute would be reversed on appeal.
applejuice and BeckyBird like this.

treehugger.gifgoorganic.jpggd.giftriadadopt.jpgfamilybed1.gif

Katc8910 is online now  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Drag and Drop File Upload
Drag files here to attach!
Upload Progress: 0
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Mothering Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off