Confused about the debate - Page 9 - Mothering Forums

Reply
 
Thread Tools
#241 of 244 Old 02-11-2014, 12:05 PM
 
Mirzam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sophia's Correction
Posts: 8,034
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 273 Post(s)

Thimerosal papers

http://www.ashotoftruth.org/thimerosal-papers

 

Thimerosal is said to be safe because nobody has ever studied it. Meet "Nobody" - Frank Engley, PhD - the researcher that found thimerosal to be unsafe at 10ppb in 1957. 

 

Chicharronita likes this.

Jupiter retrograde in the Crab - Release From Pretending
Mirzam is online now  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
#242 of 244 Old 02-11-2014, 12:47 PM
 
ss834's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Gulf Coast
Posts: 1,047
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 567 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taximom5 View Post
 

 

You see the Coalition For Mercury-Free Drugs as being "obviously biased," even though, as far as I can tell, they are not in a position of financial conflict of interest.

 


However, the CDC and FDA are staffed by people who are, more and more often, in a position of financial conflict of interest.  I have not seen you refer to the CDC as being obviously or even possibly biased; indeed, you seem quite offended by Mirzam's frustration by what seems to be a double standard.


Asking for an original source with full text for an article that was posted does not seem like a double standard to me.

I am going to drop this conversation, as it doesn't seem to be going anywhere helpful at this point.

ss834 is offline  
#243 of 244 Old 02-11-2014, 12:55 PM
 
Mirzam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sophia's Correction
Posts: 8,034
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 273 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ss834 View Post
 
 

Asking for an original source with full text for an article that was posted does not seem like a double standard to me.

I am going to drop this conversation, as it doesn't seem to be going anywhere helpful at this point.

So you don't care that this information (danger of thimerosal containing vaccines to infants) was covered up by the CDC? Does not the integrety of a governmental (military) organization not impact the validity of their research and therefore impact one's ability to have informed consent? Is it not a matter of trust?

Chicharronita and Taximom5 like this.

Jupiter retrograde in the Crab - Release From Pretending
Mirzam is online now  
#244 of 244 Old 02-11-2014, 01:55 PM
 
ma2two's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,476
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mirzam View Post
 

Frank Engley, PhD - the researcher that found thimerosal to be unsafe at 10ppb in 1957. 

 

 

At 5:35

 

"We were able to do work on the human tissue cells. And we found out that the thiomersal was the most toxic of the chemicals, and that it would be toxic down to, not grams, not milligrams, not micrograms, but nanograms, parts per billion, which was almost unbelievable, but it was true."

 

For reference, flu vaccines contain 50 micrograms thimerosal. In 2009-2010, pregnant women were injected with 100 micrograms of thimerosal, because of the separate H1N1 and regular flu shots.

applejuice, Taximom5 and stellanyc like this.
ma2two is offline  
Reply

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off