The Daily Show: Liberal "Idiocy" on Vaccines - Page 2 - Mothering Forums
Forum Jump: 
 203Likes
Reply
 
Thread Tools
#31 of 83 Old 06-05-2014, 04:19 PM
 
applejuice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: hunting the wild aebelskiever
Posts: 18,605
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
This article from Down Under is about a baby that died three generations ago from rotavirus.

http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/o...-1226941957346

Honestly, sanitation has improved immensely in the past 70+ years. This article is ridiculous. I can't imagine a baby dying from rotavirus if the mother was breastfeeding.

But, Offit would be proud.
serenbat, ghannit and Taximom5 like this.
applejuice is offline  
#32 of 83 Old 06-05-2014, 05:06 PM
 
samaxtics's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 335
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 38 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by applejuice View Post
This article from Down Under is about a baby that died three generations ago from rotavirus.

http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/o...-1226941957346

Honestly, sanitation has improved immensely in the past 70+ years. This article is ridiculous. I can't imagine a baby dying from rotavirus if the mother was breastfeeding.

But, Offit would be proud.
Interesting that they knew 85 years ago that it was rotavirus when rotavirus wasn't identified until 1973 and is said to account for 40-50% of all cases of severe diarrhea. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19799704
applejuice, serenbat and Taximom5 like this.
samaxtics is online now  
#33 of 83 Old 06-05-2014, 05:30 PM
 
teacozy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Hogwarts
Posts: 1,282
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 139 Post(s)
Don't have time to make a thorough reply....

@Taximom, Paul Offit is an expert on vaccines and vaccine reactions. He has never said that the only kind of vaccine reaction is an allergic reaction. He stated in an interview (that I believe I've posted here before) that his own daughter suffered a seizure as a reaction to a vaccine.

Second, his vaccine saves hundreds of lives per day in developing countries. Even in the US, rotavirus used to cause somewhere around 50 deaths a year and many many more hospitalizations. He cares about all children, not just wealthy ones born in a privileged country where most have access to hospitals and IV fluids that prevent most rotavirus deaths. What a monster! I wonder how many lives Dr. Mercola saves a day with his vitamin D sprays and tanning beds?

As expected, Sarah Pope has zero qualifications or expertise when it comes to vaccines/medicine/infectious diseases. She says on her blog she has a BA in economics and a masters in Government Administration. She worked for Accenture and at a brokerage firm.

She absolutely can make her own medical decisions, but the fact that she has "researched" and decided that vaccines are dangerous, and that herd immunity is a myth, is not impressive just because she is college educated. She has no qualifications that deem her any kind of expert on the topic.

“The good thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it.” ~ Neil deGrasse Tyson 
teacozy is offline  
#34 of 83 Old 06-05-2014, 05:33 PM
 
applejuice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: hunting the wild aebelskiever
Posts: 18,605
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Good point samaxtics. Who knows what the little one died of so long ago.
applejuice is offline  
#35 of 83 Old 06-05-2014, 06:52 PM
 
kathymuggle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,872
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 91 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by samaxtics View Post
I don't think parents are looking to hang a shingle and open a practice based on reading medical papers about vaccination anymore than parents who read up on childbirth are looking to become ob/gyns. They just want to research their medical choices. And I firmly believe that there are parents that have spent more time reading about vaccination than your average paediatrician and/or GP. And that point only gets reinforced every time I see a doctor on TV saying thimerosal was taken out of the MMR.

.
Well said.
applejuice and serenbat like this.

There is a battle of two wolves inside us.  One is good and the other is evil.  The wolf that wins is the one you feed.

 

Book and herb loving mama to 1 preteen and 2 teens (when did that happen?).  We travel, go to school, homeschool, live rurally, eat our veggies, spend too much time...

kathymuggle is offline  
#36 of 83 Old 06-05-2014, 07:08 PM
 
kathymuggle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,872
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 91 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by teacozy View Post

Sorry to go a bit off topic, but this claim that "educated parents are the ones choosing not to vaccinate" is just not impressive, because the overwhelming vast majority of them have no expertise in medicine or vaccines or the immune system or infectious diseases.
There is this idea among some pro-vaxxers that non-vaxxers are not smart. To prove this point I mosied on over to refutation to anti-vaccine meme facebook page (gag) and found the image below. There were, sadly, many memes to pick from.



Even the title of the piece in question says "idiocy"

When non-vaxxers point out that statistically they tend to be well educated, it is to refute memes like the one above and stem the stereotypes.
applejuice, serenbat and beckybird like this.

There is a battle of two wolves inside us.  One is good and the other is evil.  The wolf that wins is the one you feed.

 

Book and herb loving mama to 1 preteen and 2 teens (when did that happen?).  We travel, go to school, homeschool, live rurally, eat our veggies, spend too much time...


Last edited by kathymuggle; 06-05-2014 at 07:33 PM.
kathymuggle is offline  
#37 of 83 Old 06-05-2014, 07:46 PM
 
teacozy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Hogwarts
Posts: 1,282
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 139 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by kathymuggle View Post
There is this idea among some pro-vaxxers that non-vaxxers are not smart. To prove this point I mosied on over to refutation to anti-vaccine meme facebook page (gag) and found the image below. There were, sadly, many memes to pick from.



Even the title of the piece in question says "idiocy"

When non-vaxxers point out that statistically they tend to be well educated, it is to refute memes like the one above and stem the stereotypes.
You can find facebook memes that say just about anything.

Paul Offit said in this very video that a large portion of parents that don't vaccine are white, upper middle class, college educated parents with advanced degrees. This is made clear in many many articles on vaccines in the media.

The title is idiocy on vaccines, not that the parents are idiots in a general sense.

While I think that title is harsh, I stand by the fact that most of these parents are not any kind of experts in medicine, vaccines, the immune system, or infectious diseases.

“The good thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it.” ~ Neil deGrasse Tyson 
teacozy is offline  
#38 of 83 Old 06-05-2014, 08:07 PM
 
teacozy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Hogwarts
Posts: 1,282
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 139 Post(s)
This conversation reminds me of a meme that was going around a couple months ago.

I'm sure by now people have googled the answers, but I still think it makes a good point.


“The good thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it.” ~ Neil deGrasse Tyson 
teacozy is offline  
#39 of 83 Old 06-05-2014, 08:41 PM
 
applejuice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: hunting the wild aebelskiever
Posts: 18,605
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Dr. Tetyana Obukhanych PhD., is an immunologist who has a child and is against vaccination. She does not believe in magic. She is well-educated and knows what she is talking about.

She wrote Vaccine Illusion and it is available on Kindle.

Dr. Robert S. Mendelsohn, MD advocated against routine childhood vaccines in 1976 during the swine flu epidemic.
Dr. Suzanne Humpheries, MD left nephrology because the one thing all her renal failure patients had in common was a recent flu shot. She studied homeopathy.
There are plenty more reputable doctors who do not support routine vaccinations.

Last edited by applejuice; 06-05-2014 at 08:58 PM.
applejuice is offline  
#40 of 83 Old 06-05-2014, 08:42 PM
 
serenbat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,102
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 33 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by teacozy View Post

As expected, Sarah Pope has zero qualifications or expertise when it comes to vaccines/medicine/infectious diseases. She says on her blog she has a BA in economics and a masters in Government Administration. She worked for Accenture and at a brokerage firm.

She absolutely can make her own medical decisions, but the fact that she has "researched" and decided that vaccines are dangerous, and that herd immunity is a myth, is not impressive just because she is college educated. She has no qualifications that deem her any kind of expert on the topic.
So Teacozy what makes you an expert to decide that vaccines are right for you? Your degree is what? You claim to do research, what makes what your read better?

Did you ever stop to think that Sarah Pope took her advise where many others do, from their doctor? And also choose to look into herself, just like you claim to do.

I did my "research" and talked it over with my Ped who happens to support me, and there happens to be other MD's that also support not vaccinating.

 

 pro-transparency advocate

&

lurk.gif  PROUD member of the .3% club!

 

Want to join? Just ask me!

 

"You know, in my day we used to sit on our ass smoking Parliaments for nine months.

Today, you have one piece of Brie and everybody goes berserk."      ROTFLMAO.gif 

serenbat is offline  
#41 of 83 Old 06-05-2014, 09:15 PM
 
teacozy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Hogwarts
Posts: 1,282
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 139 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by applejuice View Post
Dr. Tetyana Obukhanych PhD., is an immunologist who has a child and is against vaccination. She does not believe in magic. She is well-educated and knows what she is talking about.

She wrote Vaccine Illusion and it is available on Kindle.

Dr. Robert S. Mendelsohn, MD advocated against routine childhood vaccines in 1976 during the swine flu epidemic.
Dr. Suzanne Humpheries, MD left nephrology because the one thing all her renal failure patients had in common was a recent flu shot. She studied homeopathy.
There are plenty more reputable doctors who do not support routine vaccinations.
There are always going to be outliers.

There are historians that are holocaust deniers, there are scientists who deny evolution etc.

"Michael Behe, a leading biochemist, who publishes about legitimate biochemistry, denies evolution, and is one of the major backers of intelligent design. Peter Duesberg is a brilliant scientist who discovered how certain genes caused cancer. He is an incredible scientist and is a member of the National Academies of Science, the most prestigious scientific institution in the world. Despite all of this Duesberg is an AIDS denialist, who doesn’t believe that HIV causes AIDS; in fact, he thinks that HIV is harmless, totally contradicting the valid scientific consensus on the topic. Because of Duesberg’s hypothesis, some African health ministers refuse to approve of basic treatments for HIV, which has lead to the deaths of large numbers of Africans."

So whats your point? A couple scientists or experts on the fringe does not a controversy make.

“The good thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it.” ~ Neil deGrasse Tyson 
teacozy is offline  
#42 of 83 Old 06-05-2014, 09:18 PM
 
teacozy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Hogwarts
Posts: 1,282
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 139 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by serenbat View Post
So Teacozy what makes you an expert to decide that vaccines are right for you? Your degree is what? You claim to do research, what makes what your read better?

Did you ever stop to think that Sarah Pope took her advise where many others do, from their doctor? And also choose to look into herself, just like you claim to do.

I did my "research" and talked it over with my Ped who happens to support me, and there happens to be other MD's that also support not vaccinating.
I am absolutely not an expert on vaccines, medicine, the immune system or infectious diseases . I've never pretended to be.

The difference is that I'm not trying to tell 99.9 percent of immunology and epidemiology experts who know infinitely more about this topic that I do that they're wrong either.

“The good thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it.” ~ Neil deGrasse Tyson 

Last edited by teacozy; 06-05-2014 at 09:23 PM.
teacozy is offline  
#43 of 83 Old 06-05-2014, 10:14 PM - Thread Starter
 
Turquesa's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,050
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Where are you getting your 99.9% figure?

In God we trust; all others must show data. selectivevax.gifsurf.gifteapot2.GIFintactivist.gif
Turquesa is offline  
#44 of 83 Old 06-05-2014, 10:19 PM - Thread Starter
 
Turquesa's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,050
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by teacozy View Post
I am absolutely not an expert on vaccines, medicine, the immune system or infectious diseases . I've never pretended to be.

The difference is that I'm not trying to tell 99.9 percent of immunology and epidemiology experts who know infinitely more about this topic that I do that they're wrong either.
It sounds like you're making a leap of faith, then. Is your belief in vaccine schedule compliance based on faith or science? Surely it can't be science because you yourself admitted that you're not an expert and therefore don't know enough about it. Faith in certain scientists seems to be more the motivating factor.

To some degree, we all choose whom to believe. I just try not to make that choice based on the Bandwagon Fallacy. Copernicus and Sommelweiss didn't exactly represent a consensus, did they?

In God we trust; all others must show data. selectivevax.gifsurf.gifteapot2.GIFintactivist.gif
Turquesa is offline  
#45 of 83 Old 06-06-2014, 03:55 AM
 
serenbat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,102
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 33 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by teacozy View Post
I am absolutely not an expert on vaccines, medicine, the immune system or infectious diseases . I've never pretended to be.

The difference is that I'm not trying to tell 99.9 percent of immunology and epidemiology experts who know infinitely more about this topic that I do that they're wrong either.
You must have watched a different interview with Ms Pope, the one I saw SHE was being interview and it was nothing like what you just said. 99%??????

You must have just seen something else
Mirzam and Taximom5 like this.

 

 pro-transparency advocate

&

lurk.gif  PROUD member of the .3% club!

 

Want to join? Just ask me!

 

"You know, in my day we used to sit on our ass smoking Parliaments for nine months.

Today, you have one piece of Brie and everybody goes berserk."      ROTFLMAO.gif 

serenbat is offline  
#46 of 83 Old 06-06-2014, 04:55 AM
 
kathymuggle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,872
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 91 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by teacozy View Post
You can find facebook memes that say just about anything.
I did not have to look hard, tea. This is a pervasive stereotype.

I was pointing one of the reasons why NVers like to point out that as a demographic they tend to be well educated is to combat a common stereotype.
samaxtics likes this.

There is a battle of two wolves inside us.  One is good and the other is evil.  The wolf that wins is the one you feed.

 

Book and herb loving mama to 1 preteen and 2 teens (when did that happen?).  We travel, go to school, homeschool, live rurally, eat our veggies, spend too much time...


Last edited by kathymuggle; 06-06-2014 at 05:32 AM.
kathymuggle is offline  
#47 of 83 Old 06-06-2014, 05:29 AM
 
tadamsmar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 297
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 81 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by kathymuggle View Post
"Sarah, your statements on the show implied that no amount of evidence could ever convince you that vaccines are safe and effective. Is that truly the case?

Reply

Sarah TheHealthyHomeEconomist June 3, 2014 at 9:13 pm
Actually, that part was edited out to make it look that way. What actually happened is that I told Samantha that if vaccine proponents wanted to convince parents like me that vaccination is safe – the first thing that would need to be done is to conduct a true, clinical trial of vaccinated vs unvaccinated children and assess their overall health."

http://www.thehealthyhomeeconomist.c....t8PneTmB.dpuf
I am going to test the theory that a clinical trial of vaccinated vs unvaccinated children would convince non-vaccintors. But not with one trial, instead I will make non-vaccinators aware of hundreds of such trials.

My hypothesis is that this will convince no non-vaccinators.

Here goes! Non-vaccinators read this link:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?...n+double+blind

Anyone convinced?
tadamsmar is offline  
#48 of 83 Old 06-06-2014, 05:59 AM
 
kathymuggle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,872
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 91 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by tadamsmar View Post
Dude!!! OT, so I won't waste too many keystrokes going there…but that is one lame bunch of links that do not compare completely unvaccinated children to vaccinated on schedule children.
Mirzam, applejuice and beckybird like this.

There is a battle of two wolves inside us.  One is good and the other is evil.  The wolf that wins is the one you feed.

 

Book and herb loving mama to 1 preteen and 2 teens (when did that happen?).  We travel, go to school, homeschool, live rurally, eat our veggies, spend too much time...

kathymuggle is offline  
#49 of 83 Old 06-06-2014, 06:25 AM
 
samaxtics's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 335
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 38 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by tadamsmar View Post
I am going to test the theory that a clinical trial of vaccinated vs unvaccinated children would convince non-vaccintors. But not with one trial, instead I will make non-vaccinators aware of hundreds of such trials.

My hypothesis is that this will convince no non-vaccinators.

Here goes! Non-vaccinators read this link:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?...n+double+blind

Anyone convinced?
Ok let's start with the first one in your list. Here is where you can read the about the Phase I clinical trial: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/...0707148&rank=1


The study will be conducted in 48 pregnant women and 32 non-pregnant women.

Under exclusion criteria:
HTML Code:
 -History of a febrile illness (greater than or equal to 100.4 degrees Fahrenheit or 38 degrees Celsius) within the past 72 hours for antepartum injection or febrile illness (greater than or equal to 100.4 degrees Fahrenheit or 38 degrees Celsius) within 24 hours for postpartum injection.
HTML Code:
 Previous severe reaction to any vaccine-
HTML Code:
 Receipt of a vaccine (excluding influenza), blood product ([B]excluding Rhogam[/B]) or experimental medicine [B]within the 4 weeks prior to antepartum injection[/B] [B]through 4 weeks following post-partum injection[/B]. However, [B]measles-mumps-rubella vaccine is permitted post-partum[/B]
HTML Code:
 Receipt of or plans to receive [B]influenza vaccine within the 2 weeks prior to or following[/B] antepartum injection
my bold
Is this a study of non-vaccinated vs. vaccinated as in, some participants have never received a vaccine and some have? And the answer is NO. Do you want a chance to go through your list again Tadamsmar before continuing?
Mirzam and applejuice like this.

Last edited by samaxtics; 06-06-2014 at 06:29 AM. Reason: I guess the bolding didn't work oops wrong quote feature too Sorry I'll know for next time
samaxtics is online now  
#50 of 83 Old 06-06-2014, 06:35 AM
 
tadamsmar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 297
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 81 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by kathymuggle View Post
Dude!!! OT, so I won't waste too many keystrokes going there…but that is one lame bunch of links that do not compare completely unvaccinated children to vaccinated on schedule children.
Good point, many or all of the studies are about single course of immunizations for one or a few diseases.

I will now limit my study to only 100% non-vaccinators. Do the hundreds of clinical trials that I have now made you aware of convince even a single one of you to arrange for your child to get a single immunization?

Last edited by tadamsmar; 06-06-2014 at 07:02 AM.
tadamsmar is offline  
#51 of 83 Old 06-06-2014, 06:59 AM
 
samaxtics's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 335
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 38 Post(s)
In Switzerland they sent out an electronic survey (to subscribers of a immunization newsletter that reaches 95% of paediatricians and less than 20% of all other physicians) regarding their vaccination habits for their own children. 2070 surveys went out and 1017 completed surveys came back. All physicians vaccinated children in their practice.

"Ninety-two percent of pe- diatricians followed the official immunization recom- mendations for their own children."

"nonpediatricians were more likely not to have immunized their children against measles, mumps, hepatitis B, or Haemophilus influenzae type b. They more frequently postponed diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP) (OR: 4.5; 95% CI: 2.0–10.19) and measles-mumps- rubella (MMR) vaccination..... Several comparisons confirmed the weaker use of the more recently licensed vaccines by nonpediatricians."

"Although projected immuni- zation rates were higher than effective rates, 10% of non- pediatricians would still not follow the official immunization recommendations in 2004. They would more frequently refrain from using combination vaccines and postpone DTP and MMR immunization to later in life."
http://pediatrics.aappublications.or.../e623.full.pdf

Bear in mind that over half of the recipients did not do the survey.
applejuice and beckybird like this.

Last edited by samaxtics; 06-06-2014 at 07:20 AM. Reason: Trying to figure out which icon is the quote feature Added a quote that was deleted trying to fix the quote feature.
samaxtics is online now  
#52 of 83 Old 06-06-2014, 07:12 AM
 
samaxtics's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 335
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 38 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by tadamsmar View Post
Good point, many or all of the studies are about single course of immunizations for one or a few diseases.

I will now limit my study to only 100% non-vaccinators. Do the hundreds of clinical trials that I have now made you aware of convince even a single one of you to arrange for your child to get a single immunization?
Tadamsmar, when we say unvaccinated vs vaccinated it is to be taken in the very literal sense. You claim there that such a study exists. You can't throw up a bunch of links (have YOU read each one?) and expect US to go through each one to find the one that meets the criteria. You made the claim, you must support that with evidence and then we can tell you whether it convinces us.
applejuice and kathymuggle like this.
samaxtics is online now  
#53 of 83 Old 06-06-2014, 07:36 AM
 
tadamsmar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 297
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 81 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by samaxtics View Post
Tadamsmar, when we say unvaccinated vs vaccinated it is to be taken in the very literal sense. You claim there that such a study exists. You can't throw up a bunch of links (have YOU read each one?) and expect US to go through each one to find the one that meets the criteria. You made the claim, you must support that with evidence and then we can tell you whether it convinces us.
Non-vaccinators, replace the word "children" in the search with "newborn" or "neonate". Do any of the resulting randomized placebo-controlled double-blind clinical trials on newborns that found no safety-related effects convince even a single non-vaccinator to get even a single vaccination?
tadamsmar is offline  
#54 of 83 Old 06-06-2014, 09:31 AM
 
samaxtics's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 335
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 38 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by tadamsmar View Post
Non-vaccinators, replace the word "children" in the search with "newborn" or "neonate". Do any of the resulting randomized placebo-controlled double-blind clinical trials on newborns that found no safety-related effects convince even a single non-vaccinator to get even a single vaccination?
So, you make the claim and we do the work to support your claim?

Because if that's how it works I would like to proclaim that I would be a most benevolent wealthy person. Now everyone send me money so I can prove it. All currencies and denominations accepted.
samaxtics is online now  
#55 of 83 Old 06-06-2014, 09:31 AM
 
teacozy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Hogwarts
Posts: 1,282
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 139 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by kathymuggle View Post
I did not have to look hard, tea. This is a pervasive stereotype.

I was pointing one of the reasons why NVers like to point out that as a demographic they tend to be well educated is to combat a common stereotype.
Except you are misrepresenting what that quote was referring to. It wasn't referring to NVers in a general sense. I just went and looked at it. It said "If you 'believe' nutritional measures or homeopathy will save you from vaccine preventable diseases…." followed by that meme.

Sorry, I have to agree that if a person thinks water pills and lots of kale will prevent them from getting measles if exposed then that is magical thinking.

“The good thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it.” ~ Neil deGrasse Tyson 
teacozy is offline  
#56 of 83 Old 06-06-2014, 09:33 AM
 
teacozy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Hogwarts
Posts: 1,282
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 139 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Turquesa View Post
It sounds like you're making a leap of faith, then. Is your belief in vaccine schedule compliance based on faith or science? Surely it can't be science because you yourself admitted that you're not an expert and therefore don't know enough about it. Faith in certain scientists seems to be more the motivating factor.

To some degree, we all choose whom to believe. I just try not to make that choice based on the Bandwagon Fallacy. Copernicus and Sommelweiss didn't exactly represent a consensus, did they?
Science isn't a belief system. Like my signature says, it's true whether or not you believe in it.

You don't have to be a scientist to appreciate the scientific method. I don't know about everyone else, but we learned the importance of the scientific method in elementary school.

“The good thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it.” ~ Neil deGrasse Tyson 
teacozy is offline  
#57 of 83 Old 06-06-2014, 09:49 AM
 
samaxtics's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 335
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 38 Post(s)
Teacozy, how do you define science?
applejuice likes this.
samaxtics is online now  
#58 of 83 Old 06-06-2014, 10:10 AM
 
kathymuggle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,872
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 91 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by teacozy View Post
Except you are misrepresenting what that quote was referring to. It wasn't referring to NVers in a general sense. I just went and looked at it. It said "If you 'believe' nutritional measures or homeopathy will save you from vaccine preventable diseases…." followed by that meme.
Do you deny that there are a bunch of memes and comments on rtavm that imply or state non-vaxxers are less than smart? You shouldn't - it is crystal clear and very verifiable. If you do…well then, I have no words.
applejuice likes this.

There is a battle of two wolves inside us.  One is good and the other is evil.  The wolf that wins is the one you feed.

 

Book and herb loving mama to 1 preteen and 2 teens (when did that happen?).  We travel, go to school, homeschool, live rurally, eat our veggies, spend too much time...

kathymuggle is offline  
#59 of 83 Old 06-06-2014, 10:52 AM
 
tadamsmar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 297
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 81 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by teacozy View Post
She absolutely can make her own medical decisions, but the fact that she has "researched" and decided that vaccines are dangerous, and that herd immunity is a myth, is not impressive just because she is college educated. She has no qualifications that deem her any kind of expert on the topic.
She is making medical decisions for her children. The support forum should be called "I'm Not Vaccinating my Babies" or similar to avoid obscuring the real situation which posters her are chronically overlooking.
tadamsmar is offline  
#60 of 83 Old 06-06-2014, 12:32 PM
 
samaxtics's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 335
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 38 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by tadamsmar View Post
She is making medical decisions for her children. The support forum should be called "I'm Not Vaccinating my Babies" or similar to avoid obscuring the real situation which posters her are chronically overlooking.
Is anyone confused by the intent of the "I'm not vaccinating" support forum that it needs the qualifier "my babies/children"?
applejuice likes this.
samaxtics is online now  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Drag and Drop File Upload
Drag files here to attach!
Upload Progress: 0
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Mothering Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off