Safety of pertussis vaccination in pregnant women in UK - Page 4 - Mothering Forums

 150Likes
Reply
 
Thread Tools
#91 of 94 Old 07-18-2014, 06:09 AM
 
kathymuggle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 7,346
Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1952 Post(s)
I found this. If anyone is interested they need to read it carefully.
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6207a4.htm

The review, which the recommendation to offer pregnant women a tdap every pregnancy is based on, says the following.

"Methods
In monthly teleconferences during 2012, the ACIP Pertussis Vaccines Work Group considered published, peer-reviewed literature and unpublished data relevant to vaccinating pregnant women with Tdap. When data were not available, expert opinion was considered. Summaries of the data reviewed and work group discussions were presented to ACIP before recommendations were proposed. The proposed Tdap recommendation for pregnant women was presented at the October 2012 ACIP meeting and approved by ACIP.

Summary of ACIP Deliberations and Rationale"

It then lays out its points - and no where does it discuss fetal/baby safety!
applejuice, serenbat and beckybird like this.

There is a battle of two wolves inside us.  One is good and the other is evil.  The wolf that wins is the one you feed.

 

Book and herb loving mama to 1 preteen and 2 teens (when did that happen?).  We travel, go to school, homeschool, live rurally, eat our veggies, spend too much time...

kathymuggle is online now  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
#92 of 94 Old 07-24-2014, 09:12 AM - Thread Starter
 
teacozy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Hogwarts
Posts: 4,443
Mentioned: 464 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3081 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deborah View Post
From the study: "Maternal receipt of flu vaccine during pregnancy was infrequently recorded in medical charts (2 receipts) and primarily came from maternal report (36 receipts). We defined postnatal exposure as micrograms of ethylmercury divided by the weight of the child (in kilograms) at the time of administration of each TCI. Exposures were summed over the time periods of interest. Prenatal exposure was defined as the cumulative ethylmercury amount (in micrograms) of all TCIs received by the mother during her pregnancy with the child."

Sounds like there were 36 mothers in the study who had received thimerosal containing vaccines during pregnancy. Or am I misreading something?
You're misreading. The part you quoted was only talking about the flu vaccine. They also looked at mothers who received other thimerosal-containing vaccines like immunoglobulins, tetanus toxoids, and diphtheria-tetanus.

“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.” ~ Christopher Hitchens

I'm a mom to two great kids and a wife to an amazing husband
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
I'm also proudly #teamvax
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
teacozy is offline  
#93 of 94 Old 07-24-2014, 07:54 PM
 
Deborah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: the Seacoast of Bohemia
Posts: 13,466
Mentioned: 267 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2386 Post(s)
Okay. How many women in the study received thimerosal containing vaccines.
serenbat and beckybird like this.
Deborah is offline  
#94 of 94 Old 07-25-2014, 06:52 PM
 
serenbat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 8,517
Mentioned: 108 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1357 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deborah View Post
Okay. How many women in the study received thimerosal containing vaccines.
Bumping for you



What is that number?
applejuice and beckybird like this.

Some magic is fiction, other is REAL magick!


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

I'm not in this world to live up to your expectations and you're not in this world to live up to mine.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

serenbat is offline  
Reply


User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Online Users: 16,942

53 members and 16,889 guests
afinemess , Alini , bananabee , coconotcoco , Dakotacakes , floss&ferd , hannabrown15 , hillymum , ian'smommaya , incorrigible , Janeen0225 , kathymuggle , Kelleybug , kindofcrunchy82 , lilmissgiggles , mama24-7 , mamabear0314 , mareseatoats , mckittre , Mirzam , moominmamma , NaturallyKait , Nazsmum , nemodori2084 , newmamalizzy , NomadMom9753 , oaksie68 , oldsmom , pokeyac , RollerCoasterMama , rosie023 , rubelin , samaxtics , sarrahlnorris , sciencemum , shanna-cat , shantimama , Shea Petricek , Shmootzi , Socks , Sojourner , Springshowers , sren , tifga , transpecos , Wolfcat , Xerxella , zoeyzoo
Most users ever online was 449,755, 06-25-2014 at 12:21 PM.