ALL rhogam shots still have mercury in them. There's at least 25mcg, if not more.
The so called Mercury free rhogam is extremely expensive which is why most doctors don't keep it in stock. Don't buy the "there's no more mercury in the vaccines" statement by ANY doctor...or that one, "Mercury was taken out years ago."
First of all, there's NEVER been a recall on mercury-containing vaccines since the recommendation of it's removal in 1999.
2nd-the removal of mercury was NEVER made mandatory. Only a "recommendation."
3-No manufacturer gets vials out of their "storage" to remove mercury.
4-mercury free vaccines do not lift the burden of mercury containing vaccines which manufacturers continue to produce to this day.
5-The whole reason for mercury in vaccines is a preservative. It's suppose to prevent contamination. Now, think about that...what contaminations?
6-not all doctors are concerned or smart enough to read the product inserts of their vials (or even the vials for that matter) to see if there's mercury in every dose
7-for some odd reason most doctors don't keep themselves abreast on the mercury contents in ANY of the vaccines in their office. They translate the recommendation of mercury removal to a mandatory removal.
Remember, NO ONE has ever literally removed mercury from exisiting vials before shipping. And no recalls were mandated.
the rhogam is simply take from a pool of blood . Dr. Sherri Tenpenny states that it is LESS than 1% effective. And yes, even stated by CDC, the unborn child and infants are more at risk for exposure because mercury goes directy to the fetus where it concentrates IN the fetus. Infants do not have fully functioning livers to eliminate metal until 6 months of age. So, where does that metal go?
If it crosses the blood brain barrier, one of the places it will get stored is well...in the brain.
The brain is 60% fat (mercury is a fat soluble). Thus, this is where it likes to "sit". The fats in the brain where the mercury sits are called phospholipids.
Now, this fact makes blood tests and hair tests of autistic children irrefutably WORTHLESS. But, doctors and other vax supports(those ofwhich have a conflict of interest) stick to such tactics because they are either clueless or want to keep the public in the dark. I'm just repeating the words of a neurosurgeon of over 21 years.
So, if an infant less than 6 months doesn't even have the ability to eliminate mercury from their body, what's happening to the fetus?
Not all children (once 6 months or older) have the same ability to eliminate mercury as other children. Every child metabolizes mercury differently. The rising neurological epidemic in this country of over 600% is all the proof one needs.
This is not rocket science.
Don't take the rhogam unless the physician is willing to give you a copy of the product insert. Read it thoroughly that and look for it. Now, if you read such publications on a regular basis and understand 90% of what it's talking about, you'll also understand the other hideous characteristics of the manufacturing process. You'll find plenty of other reasons NOT to participate in ANY vaccine or vaccine program.
Now, I touched on the contamination issue. ALL vaccines are contaminated. That's why formaldehyde and mercury...etc are used. The process in which vaccines are manufactured are vile. Viruses and bacteria are replicated on foreign tissue which carry contaminates (other diseases in the form of foreign bacteria and foreign viruses originally only known to wild animal species-i.e. the african monkey, cow...etc). In the case of the rhogam shot....one would have to ask what in the world could be contaminating a pool of blood from another human being? Consider this: humans are also disease carriers. We carry disease in the form of bacteria and viruses in our blood stream.
Mercury free vaccines all still have trace amounts. Is that safe? Scientifically, no.
Research research research