Japan ~ naturally boostered immunity to measles. - Mothering Forums

Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-26-2006, 04:33 AM - Thread Starter
 
Momtezuma Tuatara's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 7,461
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Okay, so I have a problem.

This medical article here:

http://jcm.asm.org/cgi/content/full/...&pmid=11980952

says:

Quote:
The anti-measles virus (MV) antibody titers in the sera of vaccinees and naturally infected individuals of different age groups were measured to help assess the efficacy of the current MV vaccination in Japan. Neutralizing (NT) antibody titers induced by vaccination were 23.2 times lower than those induced by natural infection and declined significantly by age 20. The once-decreased NT antibody titers of the vaccinees increased 23.6 times during their twenties to titers comparable to those of naturally infected individuals of the same age, implying the possible occurrence of natural infection in vaccinees with decreased anti-MV immunity.
Okay? So they get naturally boostered, right? Up to good natural levels which are WAY more effective than any vaccine right?

So why then would this be the "logical" next move?

Quote:
It should be emphasized that protective immunity induced by the one-dose vaccination currently implemented in Japan may not be strong enough to ensure lifelong immunity. A two-dose vaccination program with higher vaccination coverage needs to be considered in order to effectively control measles in Japan.


Oh, I guess its more important to try to "eliminate" the "implied" subclinical boostering?

This reminds me of another measles article in the UK, which I think was by Dr E ******, where they did a serosurvey and also found in a significant number of vaccinated kids, rising titres and also said something about subclinical re-infection.

Hmmmmmmmm......................................... .................

“I want to sell drugs to everyone. I want to sell drugs to healthy people. I want drugs to sell like chewing gum.” former Merck CEO, Henry Gadsden

Momtezuma Tuatara is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 01-01-2007, 01:12 AM - Thread Starter
 
Momtezuma Tuatara's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 7,461
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
You mean, no-one had a comment?

“I want to sell drugs to everyone. I want to sell drugs to healthy people. I want drugs to sell like chewing gum.” former Merck CEO, Henry Gadsden

Momtezuma Tuatara is offline  
Old 01-01-2007, 01:20 AM
 
Rachel J.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: TN/GA line
Posts: 1,093
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Well, I guess they have to find some "logical" reason for giving, perhaps requiring, yet another vaccine/booster. :
Rachel J. is offline  
Old 01-01-2007, 01:25 AM
 
Jasmyn's Mum's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: In the Canadian Rockies
Posts: 1,130
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
$$$ is the reason. It's logical. To Big Pharma, that is.
Jasmyn's Mum is offline  
Old 01-02-2007, 02:44 PM
 
dooldad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: NM
Posts: 206
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
It seems they want to give a booster because titres are low, not because people are getting measles. If people are getting natural boosters by exposure and are not getting measles, why bother with the booster, except for making more money.
dooldad is offline  
 
User Tag List

Thread Tools


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off