MEP may not be working for us - Mothering Forums

Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-16-2011, 05:31 PM - Thread Starter
 
Bluegoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 2,569
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

So I started year 1 of MEP with my daughter, 6, in September.  She is bored to tears with it.  For her age she's much more of an abstract then a concrete thinker, and all the repetition trying to help her make the concrete things abstract is driving her nuts.

 

OTOH, they do introduce new symbols and ideas here and there, so I don't know if I can just jump her ahead a year, and I'm not that confident about knowing how much to cut out.

 

Has anyone used MEP and know how long it goes on this way?  Is there another program more suited to her way of thinking, or am I on the wrong boat in imagining that is really the issue?


 I like the mind to be a dustbin of scraps of brilliant fabric, odd gems, worthless but fascinating curiosities, tinsel, quaint bits of carving, and a reasonable amount of healthy dirt.
Bluegoat is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 10-16-2011, 08:39 PM
 
dovey's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 519
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

We haven't done MEP, but it sounds like your daughter might be similar to my son.  We started Singapore Math last year and went through one of the books, but he was bored to tears.  And usually he loves math.  He wanted to do more interesting things rather than all the repetition that these curricula seem to offer. 

 

I was a little worried like you - are we going to skip over important ideas if we don't do the curriculum?  But getting rid of it was one of the best things we have done this year.  Math has been awesome.  I bought a few non-curricular type books on recommendation (Challenge Math for Primary grades, and Calculus by and for Young People (the "worksheets"), and he has been inspired and amazed.  He picks up all the basic stuff he really needs to know as he deals with these far more interesting and difficult math problems.  It has gone from "Ergh.  Math again!" to begging me to teach him about polar coordinate systems while we're waiting for food at a restaurant.  

 

It's very interesting - by getting rid of our math curriculum, all of a sudden, our homeschool life has become centered around math.  I don't think that you're in the wrong boat at all, considering whether your daughter's math program is not right for her.     

dovey is offline  
Old 10-17-2011, 08:51 AM
 
moominmamma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: In the middle of nowhere, at the centre of everything.
Posts: 5,808
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 95 Post(s)

Another vote for skipping and/or dispensing with curriculum. We never used MEP. We started with Singapore, but we skipped ahead to find the appropriate level of challenge (typically 2B for my kids at KG age) and we skipped around liberally within the program.

 

My kids actually liked Singapore because there wasn't much repetition and if there was too much it was very easy to sort through the exercises and find the next interesting different thing. The word problems for level 3 or 4 on up were really interesting to them, as there were often multiple ways to tackle them, and they involved multiple steps and the sort of "brain-teaser" questions I recall only getting once I had been taught algebra. I wouldn't say Singapore is a magic bullet. It worked for us because we (a) didn't do the easy first few levels and (b) found it easy to skip around in and glean what the kids liked from it and move at whatever pace was right for them without actually spending a ton of time at it. My 8-year-old is finishing 6B (~7th grade) and has typically spent about 15 minutes on it a few days a week.

 

We too have enjoyed Challenge Math and Calculus by and for Young People. We also liked Hands-On Equations. The latter is suitable for 5-year-olds and up, so long as they understand basic multiplication and division. The two other ones are probably more suitable for kids 8 and up and have enough stuff in them to challenge kids up to the high school years.

 

Math isn't nearly as sequential as a lot of curriculums lead you to believe. You don't have to wait until after ratios and fractions to introduce algebra. You don't have to memorize the timestables before learning long division. You don't have to master multiplication before learning about complementary angles in trapezoids. If something important is missing you'll bump up against the gap and you'll know what needs to fill it. "Oops, division of fractions, didn't I ever show you that? Well, here, I'll explain it. Here's the part in the book where there are some exercises, if you want to practice." 

 

Miranda


Mountain mama to two great kids and two great grown-ups
moominmamma is online now  
Old 10-17-2011, 06:30 PM - Thread Starter
 
Bluegoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 2,569
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Thanks for the replies.  I'm going to have a look t some of those resources.  Someone else suggested to me looking at a program that teaches to mastery rather than in a spiral. 

 

I may also have a look at just skipping ahead a bit in MEP and see if that solves some issues.


 I like the mind to be a dustbin of scraps of brilliant fabric, odd gems, worthless but fascinating curiosities, tinsel, quaint bits of carving, and a reasonable amount of healthy dirt.
Bluegoat is offline  
 
User Tag List

Thread Tools


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off