Sweeping changes to natl forests policy - Mothering Forums

Thread Tools
#1 of 4 Old 12-23-2004, 11:56 AM - Thread Starter
chicagomom's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: covered in cat hair
Posts: 3,035
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The new rules give economic activity equal priority with preserving the ecological health of the forests in making management decisions and in potentially liberalizing caps on how much timber can be taken from a forest.
One-quarter of U.S. species at risk of extinction -- including more than 25 species of trout and salmon -- live in national forests, according to the conservation group NatureServe. Large animals such as grizzly bears, wolves and elk depend on the forests' large, undisturbed swaths of land for habitat.

"The end result of all this is there will be more logging and less conservation of wildlife," said Mike Leahy, natural resources counsel for Defenders of Wildlife. "They're not going to provide enough land for these species to hang on."
chicagomom is offline  
Sponsored Links
#2 of 4 Old 12-23-2004, 02:05 PM
Cajunmomma's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 866
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
. But I'm not surprised.
Cajunmomma is offline  
#3 of 4 Old 12-23-2004, 09:06 PM
isleta's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: In my son's heart
Posts: 1,096
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
: UGH!!

So irritated. I love the lack of environmental review for logging companies!!

4 more years of this
isleta is offline  
#4 of 4 Old 12-27-2004, 04:03 PM
PikkuMyy's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: hmmm
Posts: 7,271
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Yes, I read about this too. It's absolutely sick. I'm reading "Song for the Blue Ocean" by Carl Safina, a researcher, writer, and investigator about water-related conservation, animal issues, etc. and it speaks about this particular issue (among others) with the salmon not having any water even though the land is preserved and having no trees and snags in the water on which they depend to hide on their way back and forth between the ocean and river.

Not to mention the impact on the Native Americans who are still living in these places - some of whom lost their land a long time ago through shady business and therefore the Federal Government can't even regulate what is done to that land.

Early intervention specialist and parent consultant since 2002.
PikkuMyy is offline  

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Online Users: 16,272

26 members and 16,246 guests
babydoulajo , Deborah , girlspn , hillymum , JElaineB , Katherine73 , KristinaMarie , KT'smama , lisak1234 , Midwestmom2009 , Mirzam , MountainMamaGC , mumto1 , NaturallyKait , philomom , rocky , RollerCoasterMama , sarrahlnorris , shantimama , Skippy918 , tapatio , thefragile7393 , verticalscope , zebra15
Most users ever online was 449,755, 06-25-2014 at 12:21 PM.