Sequential Screening and Heart Rate Questions - Mothering Forums

Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
#1 of 3 Old 08-26-2010, 05:10 PM - Thread Starter
 
AJewelz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 25
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Hi, just looking to get input on a couple of things from all of you experienced Mamas...

First, I had my 10 week ultrasound last week and saw a bouncing baby - YAY! The baby measured a few days less than I expected, but at the same time I think I ovulate a bit late in my cycle, so it makes sense. The baby had a heart rate of 160 - this is good for 10 weeks, right? The dr. said it was good, but she wasn't quite as excited as I was hoping for I guess.

Also, we signed up to do the sequential screening - not that we would do anything if we came back as high risk, but more just to be prepared. I understand it's an ultrasound and blood test and then another blood test at 19 weeks. I didn't have this when I was pregnant with my dd, but I wonder if that's because I was 27 then and am 30 now? Does anyone have any feedback about sequential screening - positive or negative? I'm just wondering what the thoughts out there are.

Thanks!
AJewelz is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
#2 of 3 Old 08-26-2010, 07:34 PM
 
changingseasons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Seattle
Posts: 8,756
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I'm not doing any of those tests, because everything that I've read seems like there is an even greater chance of getting a false positive than getting a real positive. Seems like it would cause a lot of unneeded stress. My best friend got a marker for Downs for her 3rd baby, and had to wait 2 or 3 weeks for the additional testing. Turns out it was a false positive, but she was just a wreck during that time.

I like to think of it this way- if the test does show something abnormal, what would you do?

(fwiw- I was 31 when I had DD and am 34 now.)

And just out of curiosity- do they do 10 week ultrasounds standard now?!

Mom to DD1 (10/07) and DD2 (3/11)
geek.gif I blog about our life with food allergies and eosinophilic disorders.
changingseasons is offline  
#3 of 3 Old 08-26-2010, 07:58 PM - Thread Starter
 
AJewelz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 25
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Hmm...I don't know if in general 10 week ultrasounds are standard. At my OB's office, they seem to be. (I saw midwives with my first pregnancy after 3 months, but can't see them now, as I had an emergency c-section with my dd). We also had a m/c earlier this year that we didn't know about until the 10 week ultrasound (no signs before ultrasound), so for us, it's something that we feel better having.

I would not do anything about it if I had a positive from the testing, I guess I just felt as though I might feel more prepared for the possibilities. I have heard of lots of false positives also, so I would take that into consideration and hopefully not stress over it. Which I guess...then why do the test? Something to think about for sure.
AJewelz is offline  
Reply

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off