Is there a connection between luteal phase length and pregnancy length? - Mothering Forums

Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
#1 of 16 Old 11-13-2009, 01:06 AM - Thread Starter
 
BarefootScientist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,101
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
So I was just wondering about this. It seems like it could be logical, a shorter luteal phase, say 10-13 days, leading to a shorter pregnancy ("early" baby), and a longer luteal phase (more like 14-16 days) leading to a longer pregnancy ("overdue" baby). But I have no idea if it is true or just a wild thought that popped into my head.

So for those who have charted and have given birth, can you tell me, how long is your typical luteal phase, and when did you go into labor with your child(ren)?

In my case, my LP is 12 days (11-13, usually 12 though), and my DS was born at a little over 37 weeks.

Mommy to an exuberant 3 yo bouncy.gif and a new one!  nak.gif

BarefootScientist is offline  
#2 of 16 Old 11-13-2009, 12:40 PM
 
bohemama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: almost paradise
Posts: 1,075
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I didn't chart with DD1...but with DD2 I had a 10 day lp and she was born at 41w1d.

Sarah loving wife to Scot...joyous mama to...
Emilee and Elaina and our newest addition Elliot Bell 9/15/10
bohemama is offline  
#3 of 16 Old 11-13-2009, 02:46 PM
 
broodymama's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Watching the rain
Posts: 7,366
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Ever since I started charting in 12/2003 (the cycle DS was conceived), my luteal phase ranges from 5-8 days. The only times it has ever been longer than 8 days was when I was pregnant.

DS was born at 39 weeks (induction ), DD1 at 39w6d and DD2 sometime between 38-39 weeks.

Chaotic uc.jpg homeschool.gif mama to 5 plus a bonus one on the way.  stork-suprise.gif

chicken3.gif

broodymama is offline  
#4 of 16 Old 11-13-2009, 02:52 PM
 
KCMichigan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 922
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Long LP here (14-16 days)...preemie twins (32 weeks) and lots of Preterm labor starting at 21 weeks (I know twins are different, but a single would have likely been early as well)

So no correlation here.
KCMichigan is offline  
#5 of 16 Old 11-13-2009, 05:34 PM
 
Mosaic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: La vida loca
Posts: 4,005
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
LONG LP: 14-16 days average over the last 9 years, though recently it's gotten closer to 16-18 days in recent years.

DD was born 2 weeks early.

I don't see why LP would be related to pregnancy length at all.

Mi vida loca: full-time WOHM, frugalista, foodie wannabe, 10+ years of TCOYF 

 

R-E-S-P-E-C-T spells BRAND NEW User Agreement!!

Mosaic is offline  
#6 of 16 Old 11-13-2009, 05:38 PM
 
AmyKT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: my little corner of the world
Posts: 1,301
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I have short LPs (8-11 days) and DD was born 5 days "late." I don't think LP length is a factor in delivery dates, but implantation day might be. I think DD was a late implanter, based on symptoms.

Amy (34): mommy to DD1 (11/07) and DD2 (7/10), wife, wohm, and wannabe suburban homesteader.
AmyKT is offline  
#7 of 16 Old 11-13-2009, 06:46 PM - Thread Starter
 
BarefootScientist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,101
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Huh. Interesting. It seems opposite for most of you.

There goes that thought, then.

Mommy to an exuberant 3 yo bouncy.gif and a new one!  nak.gif

BarefootScientist is offline  
#8 of 16 Old 11-13-2009, 06:47 PM - Thread Starter
 
BarefootScientist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,101
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by AmyKT View Post
I have short LPs (8-11 days) and DD was born 5 days "late." I don't think LP length is a factor in delivery dates, but implantation day might be. I think DD was a late implanter, based on symptoms.
Do you have any idea what influences implantation time?

Mommy to an exuberant 3 yo bouncy.gif and a new one!  nak.gif

BarefootScientist is offline  
#9 of 16 Old 11-13-2009, 06:51 PM
 
Marlet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Closer to home..
Posts: 8,986
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Saw this on new posts.

DD1 was 8 days overdue. My lp with her was average.

DD2 was 3 days overdue. My lp with her was 8 days.

DD3 is currently still gestating and my average lp with her was 7 days but still working itself out. It was 8 days the cycle before I conceived.

Give more**Expect Less
There is no such thing as bad weather. Only bad clothing.
Marlet is offline  
#10 of 16 Old 11-14-2009, 12:29 AM
 
AmyKT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: my little corner of the world
Posts: 1,301
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by BarefootScientist View Post
Do you have any idea what influences implantation time?
No, I don't. Long tubes?

I have read that late implantations are less likely to result in a (lasting) pregnancy, though. Probably because progesterone is already on the decline.

Amy (34): mommy to DD1 (11/07) and DD2 (7/10), wife, wohm, and wannabe suburban homesteader.
AmyKT is offline  
#11 of 16 Old 11-17-2009, 05:10 PM
 
blue butterfly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: midwest
Posts: 1,193
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
LP for me has always been about 12 days

dd1 was born at 37 weeks

dd2 was born at 38 weeks

Wife to DH (9/02) Homeschooling Mama to DD1 (2/03) DD2 (11/06) DD3(9/10)
 
blue butterfly is offline  
#12 of 16 Old 11-18-2009, 10:39 PM
 
Mountaingirl79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Asheville NC
Posts: 1,261
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I am probably an oddity. My LP is 16 days. ( OMG!) but remarkably, both my kids were born on their projected due date, without intervention. Maybe I implanted at the "average" time then? That's all I can think of...

Mom to three boys 7/7/00 fencing.gif 11/20/02 and 10/29/2011 luxlove.gif

 

Writing at: http://paisleymama.blogspot.com/ and other places! 

 

 
 
 

Mountaingirl79 is offline  
#13 of 16 Old 11-18-2009, 10:46 PM
 
Sk8ermaiden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,294
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Mine is 12 days and I had her at 42 weeks exactly (went into labor at 41 and 6). I can't think of a reason LP would influence gestation, but it is an interesting thought.

I'm Kellie :, married to Chris , and mom to one baby girl (7/12/09).
Sk8ermaiden is offline  
#14 of 16 Old 11-18-2009, 10:56 PM
 
MaerynPearl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Hubert NC
Posts: 14,540
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
My LP has always been average. My son was a week and half overdue, my daughter was just over a week early.

Artist, photographer, stay-at-home-mom and Marine wife. Mom to 4; a boy and three little girls.
MaerynPearl is offline  
#15 of 16 Old 11-18-2009, 11:07 PM
 
MaerynPearl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Hubert NC
Posts: 14,540
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by BarefootScientist View Post
Do you have any idea what influences implantation time?
Well... whenever after the initial 30 hour growth time that it snuggles into the uterine wall. Anywhere from 30 hours post-O (in cases such as my DD, whom I got a bfp with at 6dpo) to 10 days post-O. However, it usually ends up being at 7dpo. Like, insanely a lot.

I dont think that has anything to do with pregnancy length.

Things that do:

1. age and health of the mother
2. health of baby
3. whether or not the pregnancy is correctly dated
4. number of babies (twins generally come sooner than singletons even when delivering naturally, triplets sooner yet.)
5. external influences (such as smoking, stress, etc.)
6. number of pregnancy (seconds tend to be born earlier than firsts... not always but they tend to)

and what point parents were born and size of parents at birth actually has NOTHING to do with when baby will be born NOR their size at birth.

And Im glad.

Because XH was a 10 pound baby (his mom had diabetes) and I was a 9 pound baby (totally healthy! LOL) and both of mine so far have been 7 1/2 pounds and 7 pounds.

Artist, photographer, stay-at-home-mom and Marine wife. Mom to 4; a boy and three little girls.
MaerynPearl is offline  
#16 of 16 Old 11-18-2009, 11:18 PM
 
BMG580's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,176
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
My LP is typically 10-12 days long and I have delivered both my babies slightly early, one at 39 weeks and the other at 38 weeks, days. Both were spontaneous labors.

"Hey, I've got nothin' to do today but smile." - S & G
BMG580 is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Drag and Drop File Upload
Drag files here to attach!
Upload Progress: 0
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Mothering Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off