Mothering Forums - Reply to Topic

Thread: Traditional Foods v. Real Foods v. Whole Foods Reply to Thread
Title:
Message:
Drag and Drop File Upload
Drag files here to attach!
Upload Progress: 0
Trackback:
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:
 

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Mothering Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

  Topic Review (Newest First)
01-17-2012 11:43 AM
jp79

Quote:

Originally Posted by snowbunny View Post

Traditional Foods are whole, unrefined foods with special emphasis on how the food was raised and harvested as well as how it is prepared in the home. The goal is to ditch modern foods and to enjoy foods as they were eaten prior to the advent of industrial agriculture. This is why great emphasis is placed on how animals are fed, how grains are prepared and how much food is eaten raw or fermented. Traditional foods enthusiasts tend to be omnivores and veganism isn't generally considered in alignment with the traditional foods movement.

Whole Foods usually refer to foods that are in their unrefined state but there's little to no emphasis on how foods are prepared. Whole foods can be in alignment with vegetarian, vegan and omnivorous diets.

Real Food is usually synonymous with Traditional Foods thanks to Nina Planck's two books: Real Food and Real Food for Mother and Baby.

For example, whole grain sourdough bread would be fall under the categories of whole food, traditional food and real food. But, whole wheat spaghetti probably wouldn't be considered a traditional food because the grain in that spaghetti isn't prepared according to traditional methods.

None of this is hard and fast, as you can imagine. What matters is not how you label what you eat, but that you strive to eat well and in a way that feels optimal for your body.


I was coming to ask the same question as the OP. Gotta love that search feature!

 

Thank you so much for the rather succinct and easy to understand description of their differences!  thumb.gif

10-27-2009 12:19 AM
sunnysandiegan
Quote:
Originally Posted by snowbunny View Post
Traditional Foods are whole, unrefined foods with special emphasis on how the food was raised and harvested as well as how it is prepared in the home. The goal is to ditch modern foods and to enjoy foods as they were eaten prior to the advent of industrial agriculture. This is why great emphasis is placed on how animals are fed, how grains are prepared and how much food is eaten raw or fermented. Traditional foods enthusiasts tend to be omnivores and veganism isn't generally considered in alignment with the traditional foods movement.

Whole Foods usually refer to foods that are in their unrefined state but there's little to no emphasis on how foods are prepared. Whole foods can be in alignment with vegetarian, vegan and omnivorous diets.

Real Food is usually synonymous with Traditional Foods thanks to Nina Planck's two books: Real Food and Real Food for Mother and Baby.

For example, whole grain sourdough bread would be fall under the categories of whole food, traditional food and real food. But, whole wheat spaghetti probably wouldn't be considered a traditional food because the grain in that spaghetti isn't prepared according to traditional methods.

None of this is hard and fast, as you can imagine. What matters is not how you label what you eat, but that you strive to eat well and in a way that feels optimal for your body.
Thanks for the excellent descriptions!

Thanks, OP, for asking the question! I've been wondering the same thing...
10-27-2009 12:12 AM
Drummer's Wife
Quote:
Originally Posted by snowbunny View Post
Traditional Foods are whole, unrefined foods with special emphasis on how the food was raised and harvested as well as how it is prepared in the home. The goal is to ditch modern foods and to enjoy foods as they were eaten prior to the advent of industrial agriculture. This is why great emphasis is placed on how animals are fed, how grains are prepared and how much food is eaten raw or fermented. Traditional foods enthusiasts tend to be omnivores and veganism isn't generally considered in alignment with the traditional foods movement.

Whole Foods usually refer to foods that are in their unrefined state but there's little to no emphasis on how foods are prepared. Whole foods can be in alignment with vegetarian, vegan and omnivorous diets.

Real Food is usually synonymous with Traditional Foods thanks to Nina Planck's two books: Real Food and Real Food for Mother and Baby.

For example, whole grain sourdough bread would be fall under the categories of whole food, traditional food and real food. But, whole wheat spaghetti probably wouldn't be considered a traditional food because the grain in that spaghetti isn't prepared according to traditional methods.

None of this is hard and fast, as you can imagine. What matters is not how you label what you eat, but that you strive to eat well and in a way that feels optimal for your body.

Great post - Thanks!
10-27-2009 12:10 AM
nicolelynn Traditional foods also seems to have an emphasis on high fat, vs whole foods can mean low fat.
10-26-2009 08:34 PM
WindyCityMom what a great explanation! thanks!!
10-26-2009 05:19 PM
snowbunny Traditional Foods are whole, unrefined foods with special emphasis on how the food was raised and harvested as well as how it is prepared in the home. The goal is to ditch modern foods and to enjoy foods as they were eaten prior to the advent of industrial agriculture. This is why great emphasis is placed on how animals are fed, how grains are prepared and how much food is eaten raw or fermented. Traditional foods enthusiasts tend to be omnivores and veganism isn't generally considered in alignment with the traditional foods movement.

Whole Foods usually refer to foods that are in their unrefined state but there's little to no emphasis on how foods are prepared. Whole foods can be in alignment with vegetarian, vegan and omnivorous diets.

Real Food is usually synonymous with Traditional Foods thanks to Nina Planck's two books: Real Food and Real Food for Mother and Baby.

For example, whole grain sourdough bread would be fall under the categories of whole food, traditional food and real food. But, whole wheat spaghetti probably wouldn't be considered a traditional food because the grain in that spaghetti isn't prepared according to traditional methods.

None of this is hard and fast, as you can imagine. What matters is not how you label what you eat, but that you strive to eat well and in a way that feels optimal for your body.
10-26-2009 04:41 PM
kalishea Traditional Foods v. Real Foods v. Whole Foods:
are these all the same thing? If not, how do they differ?

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off