Mothering Forums - Reply to Topic

Thread: Anyone choose to do the Hib? Appt tom. and panicking Reply to Thread
Title:
Message:
Drag and Drop File Upload
Drag files here to attach!
Upload Progress: 0
Trackback:
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:
 

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Mothering Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

  Topic Review (Newest First)
08-19-2006 12:00 AM
dickysgirl I agree with this going in the archieves! I really had issues with the HIB and Prevnar vax. Thanks so much for the great thread!
08-18-2006 07:25 PM
Plummeting Wow! I'm so glad your appointment went well. It sounds like your ped is a real keeper.
08-18-2006 06:53 PM
midstreammama just chiming in to say I think this thread should go in the archives as well.
08-18-2006 05:05 PM
mom2tig99Nroo03
Quote:
Originally Posted by ~Ryleigh's Mommy~
The appt went great!
When I told the pedi that I didn't want to continue with the Hib and prevnar because according to the CDC, she doesn't have a SINGLE risk factor for them, and because of diabetes thing and the whole serotype/organism replacement, she was totally supportive. She then asked what our long term plans for vaxing were. When I told her, she said that when she gets a little older "make sure to take her to those chicken pox and measles parties as soon as you find out about them because they are only contagious for a short time" and to "make sure and go if you find one because they don't have a whole lot of those parties anymore"
Even though I had planned on taking her to those types of parties, I never mentioned it to her, she brought it up first!

Thanks everyone!


~Melissa~
wow! sounds like a great visit!
08-18-2006 04:47 PM
suschi
Quote:
Originally Posted by ~Ryleigh's Mommy~

I don't know how they estimated it or what proof they have. That info came from an anti vax site- not the CDC. So I really don't think they would make up numbers to try to scare me about a disease.



That's the point I was trying to make. In 1994 after they mass vaxed for it, there were hardly any cases. While in 1984, before they vaxed for it, there was 20,000something. I don't know how many deaths, but the figure they gave was that it is fatal in 5-10% of the cases.
That's the point being made, no one knows the number of cases prior to the vaccine being licensed because hib wasn't nationally notifiable until several years AFTER the vaccine was licensed. Meaning, they MADE UP the number of cases, 20,000 they claim, ESTIMATED from a few states who were voluntarily reporting.

They did the same thing with Hep B, claiming 200,000 cases reported per year, yet when I looked up the actual cases reported, it was less than 11,000!! Where did they get the other 189,000 cases? They claim these are the amount of cases that go unreported. Again, pulling the numbers out of the air.
08-18-2006 03:52 PM
wonderwahine that is a MUCHO cool ped......I want one like that.
08-18-2006 03:37 PM
EVC What a cool ped
08-18-2006 03:36 PM
~Ryleigh's Mommy~ The appt went great!
When I told the pedi that I didn't want to continue with the Hib and prevnar because according to the CDC, she doesn't have a SINGLE risk factor for them, and because of diabetes thing and the whole serotype/organism replacement, she was totally supportive. She then asked what our long term plans for vaxing were. When I told her, she said that when she gets a little older "make sure to take her to those chicken pox and measles parties as soon as you find out about them because they are only contagious for a short time" and to "make sure and go if you find one because they don't have a whole lot of those parties anymore"
Even though I had planned on taking her to those types of parties, I never mentioned it to her, she brought it up first!

Thanks everyone!


~Melissa~
08-18-2006 02:46 AM
Momtezuma Tuatara If that's not serotype replacement, what is. So in return for the use of the Hib vaccine, in came pneumococcus and now a new Hib strain, and in return for prevnar in hop a whole lot of new strains to fill the empty hole.

So what will they do?

Say "What we need are new vaccines to them all"
08-18-2006 02:43 AM
Momtezuma Tuatara
Quote:
Originally Posted by ~Ryleigh's Mommy~
OK wait, let me make sure I really do understand, lol.
Ok so if you vaccinate against Hib, it won't cause an increase in other HI bacteria, but it will cause an increase in pneumonoccocal.
But if you vaccinate with PCV, it does increase the chance of other strains of PC taking over.
I knew that the prevnar only covered 7 of the 90something strains, leaving room for the others to move in.
But as I understand it, if you vaccinate against Hib, it DOESN'T leave room for other HI to move in.
It was the part about vaxing against Hib leaving room for PC that I was incorrect.
Correct?
http://www.cbc.ca/story/science/nati...h.html?ref=rss

Quote:
Vaccines are becoming less effective in combating some strains of bacteria that cause meningitis, pneumonia and upper respiratory infections in the North, an international meeting of health officers being held in Siberia has heard.

The International Congress on Circumpolar Health has heard that a vaccine that has eliminated the threat caused by seven strains of pneumococcus bacteria isn't working as well as it did when it was introduced just five years ago.

Medical officials have relied on the vaccine Prevnar for several years to protect infants against the bacteria, responsible for 80 per cent of pneumococcal disease. Now, they say, it's beginning to fail to protect infants against new strains on the rise.

"The vaccine is covering those serotypes that were most prevalent in Alaska and has reduced them dramatically," said Dr. Michael Bruce of the Centre for Disease Control, based at the Arctic Investigations Program in Anchorage.

"And now we're seeing other serotypes moving in to fill the niche and so that is worrisome."

..."We are starting to see that similar kind of thing that as you protect against one strain of the bacteria, others that didn't formally play a significant role may from time to time produce serious disease," he said.

Larke also points to worrisome developments with the Haemophilus Influenza type B vaccine, which he says has been almost miraculous in the fight against meningitis. The disease can lead to brain damage and deafness in infants.

Medical officers are now seeing another serious strain, called Type A, and there's no vaccine for it.
What does this say to you?
08-18-2006 02:38 AM
Momtezuma Tuatara PPS they were not my underlinings. They were done by the doctor who supplied the memorandum to me.
08-18-2006 02:37 AM
Momtezuma Tuatara The note on this memorandum relates to the menomune A vaccine used in this country about that time, which had the same manufacturing process was also tested in Finland, had no side effects or problems there, but was a PITB here.
08-18-2006 02:34 AM
Momtezuma Tuatara
Quote:
Originally Posted by gnu
The first Hib vaccine was licensed in 1985. Hib was put on the childhood recommended schedule of immunizations in 1993. Prior to 1991, Hib was not a notifiable disease.
Just a bit of history. There was a vaccine introduced in 1986, but it all turned up-end.

I have notes taken of the rat trials presented by the FDA of the Hib trials which showed that the early Hib vaccine, licenced in 1985, which was the early polysaccharide one, not the later conjugated Hib vaccine, not only provoked Hib in rats (by causing transient immune suppression for 7 - 14 days) but also in humans.

That is why the polysaccharide vaccine was kept very very quiet. It continued to be used after 1987, but was rapidly replaced with the conjugate vaccine, and the CDC prefer not to talk about this.

I've scanned and posted at photobucket the memorandum sent to all paediatricians.

http://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f7...rion/upeB6.jpg

http://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f7...rion/upeBD.jpg

http://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f7...rion/upeC9.jpg

But I won't leave them there forever, so if you want them, download them onto your computer.
08-17-2006 11:24 PM
~Ryleigh's Mommy~
Quote:
Originally Posted by annalily
I think this thread should go in the archives!

I agree, there is only one thread about Hib in the archives.
08-17-2006 09:21 PM
annalily I think this thread should go in the archives!
08-17-2006 07:46 PM
Plummeting I know about the fear, I really do. I took DD in at 3 months and was talked into both Hib and Prevnar, which I had decided beforehand that I would NOT get. We got there and the doctor started saying "meningitis" and "deadly" and "she would die if she got these diseases", etc., etc. And we're all so afraid of meningitis.

Did you know that some other countries have a vaccine for meningococcal disease on their regular infant or early childhood schedule? I bet you never even think about that one, since it isn't on the infant schedule here. Just wait - it will be soon. And then they'll start telling us all how deadly that is and how likely our children are to die if they don't have that vaccine. It never ends.

I think it *should* make you feel better that none of us received the Hib vaccine. We all made it to adulthood, the vast majority without ever experiencing any serious Hib-related illness. In fact, if you start asking people your parents' age, I bet most of them will tell you they never even knew of a child dying of meningitis. 600 out of MILLIONS born every year is not a lot. It really isn't. Especially when you can bet that over half of them were formula fed, another percentage were suffering from other health conditions, etc. It was probably only a very, very few healthy, breastfed infants living in a cigarrette smoke-free home that suffered from severe Hib disease, and even fewer who suffered any long-term consequences or died.
08-17-2006 07:23 PM
LongIsland Also keep in mind that there has been a decrease in all HI serotypes, not just type b.
08-17-2006 07:15 PM
LongIsland Bacterial meningitis in the United States, 1978 through 1981. The National Bacterial Meningitis Surveillance Study
W. F. Schlech 3rd, J. I. Ward, J. D. Band, A. Hightower, D. W. Fraser and C. V. Broome


From 1977 to 1981, 18,642 cases of bacterial meningitis were reported to the Centers for Disease Control.

We analyzed data from 27 states with full participation from 1978 through 1981. Hemophilus influenzae was the most frequent cause of bacterial meningitis (48.3%), [LONGISLAND'S NOTE: ***ALL*** SEROTYPES] followed by Neisseria meningitidis (19.6%) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (13.3%).


http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content...ct/253/12/1749
08-17-2006 06:58 PM
comfybuns Here is a quick search done in the vaers data base for Hib vaccines related deaths.
http://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/fin...X=HIB&DIED=Yes

ETA: Approx 3 out of every 1000 people who come into close contact with a child who has Hib will get the disease (p 163 of What Your Dr May Not Tell You About Children's Vaccinations)
08-17-2006 06:50 PM
wonderwahine I had hib as a baby, in 1984 before a vax for it......the drs didnt see it as a huge deadly disease in me, gave mum some antibiotics and sent me home. I was a preemie as well.

unfortuantly, I didn't know about not vaxing until to late with ds, so has had the hib series. but my next kids wont. If you are bf hib wont be a big concern.
08-17-2006 06:44 PM
alegna

I would also suggest not arguing or even "discussing" the vaccinations at the appointment. Just simply saying- we're not vaccinating today, it's not up for discussion.

good luck!

-Angela
08-17-2006 06:42 PM
~Ryleigh's Mommy~ Ok, I see. Thanks.
Ughh, you can't trust anyone can you Anyone can just take a statistic and manipulate it to make it say what they want I guess. :
It's like what they did with Polio. They changed the diagnosis criteria for it, and suddenly only counted the cases where they actually had been tested for it and VOILA! Look, we've ended Polio!
I sure am glad I have you ladies to fall back on:
Ok, I think I'm pretty confident about tomorrow. I think I was just having one of those paranoid obsessive new mommy moments
08-17-2006 06:13 PM
LongIsland continued . . .


From the CDC Pink Book: The incidence of invasive Hib disease began to decline dramatically in the late 1980s, coincident with licensure of conjugate Hib vaccines

In other words, the vaccine had nothing to do with the initial dramatic decline. The incidence of hib dramatically declined around the same time a vaccine was licensed, not introduced.

At least the CDC acknowledges that it was a coincidence and made a point of stating "licensure" instead of "introduction" or "introduction and widespread use."

The incidence of HI type b would have continued to decline IN SPITE OF the vaccine . . . just as the other "no vax" serotypes declined.
08-17-2006 05:53 PM
LongIsland
Quote:
Originally Posted by ~Ryleigh's Mommy~
That's the point I was trying to make. In 1994 after they mass vaxed for it, there were hardly any cases. While in 1984, before they vaxed for it, there was 20,000something. I don't know how many deaths, but the figure they gave was that it is fatal in 5-10% of the cases.[/FONT][/COLOR]
The NVIC got their information from the CDC website and/or promotional pages/materials.

Let's talk a little bit about how the CDC "estimates" disease incidence.
For example, prior to the introduction of the varicella vaccine, the CDC "estimated" that 4 MILLION children got the chicken pox annually.

How did they get that number? Well, they used the birth cohort. Four million children are born annually . . . so four million children will get chicken pox.

How did the CDC come up with the 20,000 incidence estimate prior to reporting of HI ????

From the CDC Pink Book:

Before the availability of national reporting data, several areas conducted active surveillance for H. influenzae disease, which allowed estimates of disease nationwide.

TRANSLATED: They used "surveillance" in a few cities in order to come up with a 20,000 incidence rate and 600 mortality rate. Meanwhile, these surveillance areas did not distinguish between serotypes.
08-17-2006 05:46 PM
schatz I can only add that once you put the vax in, you can't take it out. But you can always delay giving the shot. Don't get this vax tomorrow. Wait until you are sure you really want your dd to have it. If I recall correctly from when my dd was little, the ped said we could skip Hib because I was bfing and she wasn't in daycare. My dd is now three and hasn't been to the doc since 9 months and my 16 month old ds has only been there once at two weeks old. No menigitis in our house. Be strong and keep doing your research.
08-17-2006 05:28 PM
~Ryleigh's Mommy~ I just wanted to point out that I didn't come on here trying to talking anybody into getting the Hib vax or anything like that.
I am a fairly new momma who is even newer to the "anti-vax scene" who is having some new mom anxieties. I am generally very anti-vax now, but for some reason the meningitis just really scares me. Like I said in my OP, I had previously made up my mind not to vax at all (and I really want to stick with that decision) but I have been reading some things that makes me worried that I might get scared into getting her that one shot. Especially since up until some nice ladies shared their links, I had not really read anything bad about the Hib shot.
I guess I just wanted some reassurance and maybe some ammunition to help me be more confident when I face the pedi tomorrow.
I have read mixed things on how serious or how easily caught Hib meningitis really is, so I don't really know what to believe about that aspect. So what I would really like is info on the ill effects of the vaccine so that I don't end up getting it "just to make myself feel better".
I have read in a few places here about sometimes feeling like there is that drum beating "Just Do It". And I guess I am really hearing that drum with this particular vax.
So like I said, what I really need is just some confidence, not to be condescended to or argued with.
08-17-2006 05:15 PM
~Ryleigh's Mommy~
Quote:
Originally Posted by alegna
Bolding mine. Estimated? How? What proof do they have? Um, pulling numbers out of the air.-Angela
I don't know how they estimated it or what proof they have. That info came from an anti vax site- not the CDC. So I really don't think they would make up numbers to try to scare me about a disease.


Quote:
Originally Posted by alegna

Okay- in 1994- 329 cases in children under 5. Hmm. 329. Not thousands. And how many deaths? Any?

-Angela
That's the point I was trying to make. In 1994 after they mass vaxed for it, there were hardly any cases. While in 1984, before they vaxed for it, there was 20,000something. I don't know how many deaths, but the figure they gave was that it is fatal in 5-10% of the cases.
08-17-2006 05:13 PM
Awaken
Quote:
Originally Posted by gnu
These things, posted months ago by Long Island, helped put things into perspective for me:

The first Hib vaccine was licensed in 1985. Hib was put on the childhood recommended schedule of immunizations in 1993. Prior to 1991, Hib was not a notifiable disease.

Here are the number of reported Hib cases:

1991 (2,764)
1992 (1,412)
1993 (1,419) Hib placed on childhood schedule, resulting in universal immunization and state-by-state mandates for entry to daycare/school

1994 (1,174)
1995 (1,180)
1996 (1,170)
1997 (1,162)
1998 (1,194)
1999 (1,309)
2000 (1,398)
2001 (1,597)
2002 (1,743)
2003 (2,013)

Speaks volumes doesn't it?


Historical reporting data from the CDC:
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00035381.htm
----------


You asked what we learn from this. I just learned something new today actually. I learned that the number of reported adverse events associated with Hib vaccine outnumber the actual reported cases of the illness (even before it was universally recommended):

VAERS Data (go to page 16):
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/PDF/ss/ss5201.pdf

-------------

And these posts:

http://www.mothering.com/discussions...88&postcount=8

(!) http://www.mothering.com/discussions...0&postcount=27

-------------

And finally, this site (one of the few "vaccination sites" I like, as it goes straight to the articles and abstracts for its conclusions)

http://www.vaccinationnews.com/Daily...astfeeding.htm


I truly hope this helps! Good luck.
gnu, thanks for all that info- I think my decision is now clear, we won't be doing hib!!
08-17-2006 04:57 PM
Plummeting
Quote:
Originally Posted by ~Ryleigh's Mommy~
OK wait, let me make sure I really do understand, lol.
Ok so if you vaccinate against Hib, it won't cause an increase in other HI bacteria, but it will cause an increase in pneumonoccocal.
But if you vaccinate with PCV, it does increase the chance of other strains of PC taking over.
I knew that the prevnar only covered 7 of the 90something strains, leaving room for the others to move in.
But as I understand it, if you vaccinate against Hib, it DOESN'T leave room for other HI to move in.
It was the part about vaxing against Hib leaving room for PC that I was incorrect.
Correct?
So far, that's all I've seen any real evidence for. I've seen at least one paper discussing the possibility that there has been a slight increase in invasive HI type A disease, but nothing big. From my non-scientists understanding of it, Haemophilus Influenzae and S. Pneumoniae are epidemiologically different and respond very differently to vaccines when it comes to serotype replacement.
08-17-2006 04:53 PM
alegna
Quote:
Originally Posted by ~Ryleigh's Mommy~
This is from the National Vaccine Information Center:

In 1984, there were 20,000 cases of Hib disease estimated to have occurred in the U.S. that year, the highest number that are thought to have occurred in one year. In 1994, there were 1,174 cases of Hib disease reported, with 329 cases occurring in children under five years of age and 463 occurring in adults over 60 years old.
Bolding mine. Estimated? How? What proof do they have? Um, pulling numbers out of the air.

Okay- in 1994- 329 cases in children under 5. Hmm. 329. Not thousands. And how many deaths? Any?

-Angela
This thread has more than 30 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off