|
|||||||
editorial columns family tools community features
|
Get to Know the Mothering Crew Mothering has a long tradition of including a staff photo—dubbed "Backstage"—in the magazine's annual January/ February issue. The feature perennially generates excited response, and we receive many comments from readers who appreciate being able to connect our smiling, real-people faces with the black-and-white names listed on the masthead. We now offer the chance to learn even more about the fabulous folks who make Mothering happen: visit the About Us section of our website, and check out individual images and accompanying bios of the dedicated, dynamic staff. Natural Remedies for Morning Sickness New research has found that because women with morning sickness don't feel like eating or drinking, they may find themselves dehydrated, which could be compounding and creating the symptoms of morning sickness and impairing prenatal health. Proper hydration is critical to every system and process in your body. At the first sign of morning sickness, nausea or vomiting, increase your fluid intake of water through out the day. Morning sickness is a thirst signal of both the mother and the baby.
Never take any prescription or non-prescription drugs for your nausea. Consult with a midwife, physician or homeopath if you find your morning sickness is not alleviated by the above remedies. Reasons for nausea can be many and varied and getting at the cause can give better direction to your individual remedy and help you to feel better, sooner. Source: Copyright 2008, Secrets Newsletter 2008, by National Bestselling Author, Gail J. Dahl Pregnancy & Childbirth Secrets http://web.mac.com/pregnancysecrets. This article may be reprinted or posted for the purpose of childbirth education if references are included. The information contained in or provided through this publication is intended for general consumer understanding and education only and is not intended to be, and is not provided as, a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Always seek the advice of your midwife, physician, nurse or other qualified health care provider before you undergo any treatment or for answers to any questions you may have regarding any medical condition. Advocacy Group Unveils New, Improved Website The International Cesarean Awareness Network (ICAN) has launched a new, user-friendly website, in an effort to further the group's outreach. Easy navigation is a key feature of the revamped site, which provides information separated into five categories: Pregnancy, Recovery, Vaginal Birth After Cesarean (VBAC), Advocacy, and Community. The site lets women research the VBAC policies of hospitals near them; learn how to correct problems (such as malposition or pre-eclampsia) that commonly lead to cesareans; get quick physical recovery tips to help after a cesarean; and stay up-to-date on medical research on pregnancy and birth. New community features include user birth blogs, videos and images; and the capability for users to create their own homepage on the ICAN site to share with friends and family. ICAN leadership also can connect more easily with the women ICAN serves via the site. Further, the site features a new logo. ICAN is pleased to note that the logo and all of the web work were completed entirely by volunteers. This new site is a proactive response to research in 2007 by the National Center for Health Statistics that showed the cesarean rate reached a record high of 31.1%. Further, a CDC report indicated the maternal death rate rose for the first time in decades, and Consumer Reports includes a cesarean in its list of "10 overused tests and treatments." Other research from 2007 cites that VBAC continues to be a reasonably safe birthing choice for mothers. And while studies indicate a VBAC is a viable option, women often have difficulty finding a health care provider who encourages a VBAC—which is where one of the site's new features comes into play. "The most useful tool for women is probably the Hospital VBAC Ban information," Collins said. "Women can look up the hospitals near them and find out their VBAC policy and if any doctors are actually available to attend them. It is getting difficult for so many women to find a VBAC supportive provider and this is one way to make that a little easier for them."
Source: http://ican-online.org/ Pre-Teen Boy's Choice Considered Only if Parents Disagree Evading answering the question of whether the forced circumcision of a 12-year-old boy is harmful or raises constitutional issues at the federal or state levels, the Oregon Supreme Court, on January 25, 2008, ruled that: "[A]lthough circumcision is an invasive medical procedure that results in permanent physical alteration of a body part and has attendant medical risks, the decision to have a male child circumcised for medical or religious reasons is one that is commonly and historically made by parents in the United States."This ruling affirms that, in Oregon, a male child may be forcibly circumcised if the parents desire. The Court also ordered that a custody court determine the 12-year-old boy's "attitude regarding circumcision" before deciding if a change in custody is warranted by a father's forcing his son to be circumcised. The Court did not find that the boy will ultimately be allowed to choose whether to be circumcised. In Boldt v. Boldt, Lia and James Boldt, the divorced parents of 12-year-old "M," are litigating whether James, who currently has primary custody, has the legal right to force "M" to be circumcised. Lia has argued that "M" does not wish to be circumcised and that, regardless, circumcision is not in his best interest. James has argued that, as custodial parent, he has an absolute right to force "M" to be circumcised. He has also argued that his constitutional freedom of religion protects his decision to forcibly circumcise "M" because he has converted to Judaism, and claims that, when he was nine, "M" converted as well. Doctors Opposing Circumcision filed an amicus brief on behalf of Lia Boldt, arguing in part that "M" is constitutionally entitled to the protection of an Oregon state law outlawing female circumcision, aka female genital mutilation. The American Jewish Congress, the American Jewish Committee, the Anti-Defamation League, and the Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations of America jointly filed an amicus brief on behalf of James Boldt's argument of religious freedom. Under the Court's ruling, if it is determined that "M" does not want to be circumcised, the trial court must then determine whether "forcing M at age 12 to undergo the circumcision against his will could seriously affect the relationship between M and father, and could have a pronounced effect on father's capability to properly care for M" (emphases in original). Only if the trial court determines that forcible circumcision could adversely affect "M"'s relationship with his father will the court then consider whether a change in custody to "M"'s mother is in the child's best interest. Under the Court's decision, James Boldt may still be allowed to forcibly circumcise "M" if the trial court determines that to do so would not adversely affect their relationship. Under Oregon state law, determining a child's wishes or best interest can be done through interviews with and examinations of the child, as well as with the assistance of a variety of experts. Throughout this process, "M" will remain in the custody of his father, despite Lia Boldt's assertion that "M" has said he fears disagreeing with his father's decision. Those fears may be well founded: James Boldt's role in their marriage as his wife's physically abusive "god'" or "sovereign'" was described in an earlier decision of the Oregon Court of Appeals. |
Featured Product Klean Kanteen and Avent, an unbeatable combination for a safer, healthier sippy at nubiusorganics.com
|
|||||