Joined
·
5,261 Posts
So I'm 9dpo today and tested....BFN, which discourages me. I know that most people would think it's ridiculous to get discouraged this early on, but I have been pregnant 13 times, and all but 2 of those have been BFP's that began to show on the evenings of 8/9dpo (I get stronger BFPs in the evenings than with FMU).
I know they say "every pregnancy is different", but after an early BFP that many times, wouldn't it be fair to assume that I just tend to implant early? And that my chances of a BFP, if I had a BFN at 9 dpo- are much slimmer than the average person who tests negative this early on?
I realize it probably looks like I'm thinking WAY too much into this, but it's how my mind works.
My other question is for the ladies out there who only have one tube left. I lost mine in 2012 in emergency surgery (ruptured ectopic). I have had one baby since then, and 2 more early miscarriages. As I understand it, the remaining tube can still "grab" the egg from the opposite ovary. So if this happens, does ovulation delay a bit? I mean, say all my ovulation signs are on CD14, and I release an egg on that day, would it take longer than normal for the egg to get to a location where it can be fertilized as opposed to a direct path from ovary to tube? Does that account for the slightly lessened chance of pregnancy after you've lost a tube, or is that statistic based on that egg just not being caught at all?
I know they say "every pregnancy is different", but after an early BFP that many times, wouldn't it be fair to assume that I just tend to implant early? And that my chances of a BFP, if I had a BFN at 9 dpo- are much slimmer than the average person who tests negative this early on?
I realize it probably looks like I'm thinking WAY too much into this, but it's how my mind works.
My other question is for the ladies out there who only have one tube left. I lost mine in 2012 in emergency surgery (ruptured ectopic). I have had one baby since then, and 2 more early miscarriages. As I understand it, the remaining tube can still "grab" the egg from the opposite ovary. So if this happens, does ovulation delay a bit? I mean, say all my ovulation signs are on CD14, and I release an egg on that day, would it take longer than normal for the egg to get to a location where it can be fertilized as opposed to a direct path from ovary to tube? Does that account for the slightly lessened chance of pregnancy after you've lost a tube, or is that statistic based on that egg just not being caught at all?
