did anyone read about this? Very interesting and scarey<br><br><br><a href="http://www.sierratimes.com/03/07/02/article_tro.htm" target="_blank">http://www.sierratimes.com/03/07/02/article_tro.htm</a>
Excuse me. Ahem.<br><br>
If you go to the other flights that day that hit the other buildings (those towers that must've been in someone's way) there are no hijackers on the manifests either.<br><br>
Well, now. "The Magnificent 19" were figments of everybody's imagination? Or perhaps just don't quite deserve to be on the same manifests with their victims' names?<br><br>
You know, they weren't good customers. Not nice to buy a plane ticket and then crash the plane, particularly into occupied buildings.<br><br><br><img alt="" class="inlineimg" src="/img/vbsmilies/smilies/rolleyes.gif" style="border:0px solid;" title="rolleyes">:<br><br><br><br>
And if you peek around the Sierra Times, you'll find lots of other things that you can roll your eyes at, too.<br><br><br><br><br>
Really, finding blame all over the place is one thing. But to twist facts ... never mind.
I had never heard this before.<br><br><br>
when I went to google and put in the flight i found more...here was one website that had its own take on the missing passengers..<br><br>
not that anything means anything...<br><br>
I don't know what I think about it all. maybe the day is so painful my brain is too overwhelmed<br><br>
anyway...<br><br><a href="http://www.marsearthconnection.com/manifests.html" target="_blank">http://www.marsearthconnection.com/manifests.html</a>
Um, he is really making things up.<br><br>
Not only are the passanger lists readily availible but he is dead wrong about how many passengers were identified. Arlington National cemetary has info regarding that on their website.
Here is more information on the 9/11 attacks. I have read it and have found it mind boggling. It is long. I am not sure what to think.<br><br><br><br>
I hope I put this address in correctly. For some reason I am having difficulty.
There's a big boo-boo here:<br><br><div style="margin:20px;margin-top:5px;">
<div class="smallfont" style="margin-bottom:2px;">Quote:</div>
<table border="0" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" width="99%"><tr><td class="alt2" style="border:1px inset;">A new must-read book by investigative reporter Posner - "Why America Slept" - takes the conspiracy to the highest of levels of the Saudi government. He says a top bin Laden lieutenant, Abu Zubaydah, who was captured in March 2002, stunned investigators when - allegedly given the "truth serum" sodium pentothal - fingered three top Saudis. They were Prince Ahmed bin Salman bin Abdul Aziz, the Westernized owner of 2002 Kentucky Derby winner War Emblem; Prince Turki al-Faisal bin Abdul Aziz, the kingdom's longtime intelligence chief, and Prince Fahd bin Turki bin Saud al-Kabir.<br><br>
The most incredible part of the story is what happened next. In an eight-day period in late July 2002, Prince Ahmed died at age 43 from a heart attack, Prince Turki died in a car crash and Prince Fahd "died of thirst." Coincidence? What do you think?</td>
Prince Turki al-Faisal bin Abdul Aziz is alive and the Saudi ambassador to Great Britain.
That is an embarrassing mistake. But there was... I can't quite grasp the details from memory... there was a wild chain of deaths in Saudi right after 9/11 and in the all craziness it kinda never got much attention. One prince died suddenly and then a cousin (I think) died driving across Saudi to be at his funeral. And there was a third death in there somewhere. As I said my memory of the details is sketchy at best so when I read that paragraph I figured he was refering to those three.
Yes, I recall the same kama. So there was someone else I just haven't found a name yet. Haven't tried all that hard but that glaring error just jumped out at me. I'd have expected it would have glared at that Philadelphia newspaper and Truth Out too.