<div style="margin:20px;margin-top:5px;">
<div class="smallfont" style="margin-bottom:2px;">Quote:</div>
<table border="0" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" width="99%"><tr><td class="alt2" style="border:1px inset;">
<div>Originally Posted by <strong>loved</strong></div>
<div style="font-style:italic;">I think it is hugely arrogant to think that we get to say how or WHY a birth unfolds. Most times it truly is a mystery.</div>
</td>
</tr></table></div>
Well, we can't ever say for sure. I mean, so a mother's blood pressure drops with an epidural. Can we say without any doubt that's why? Well, I suppose not, but it sure would be an awfully big coincidence then. In the same way I can say that it's highly likely that the midwife's actions contributed to the way I experienced birth and the way my body functioned in birth. She was sitting between my legs peering and prodding at my crotch. Knowing what I do now about inhibition and hormones, I can say that probably had a lot to do with why my pushing phase was so long. And I do know how her words affected me. That's not a mystery. And again, it's likely that her words had a certain affect on the labor and not another. I think often when it appears to be a mystery we just haven't looked closely enough.<br><br><div style="margin:20px;margin-top:5px;">
<div class="smallfont" style="margin-bottom:2px;">Quote:</div>
<table border="0" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" width="99%"><tr><td class="alt2" style="border:1px inset;">If there is a completely anonymous feedback system (which there already is: one could write an anonymous letter to the peer review system/board or NARM in most states), then what happens when there are questions - ie she wants to know why the midwife didn't do XYZ? Or what was the midwife thinking at the time? If it's an anonymous letter it's a blanket statement.</td>
</tr></table></div>
That's not the kind of anonymous system I'm talking about. How many people are going to hear a letter given to NARM, and what guarantee is there that it will even be read at peer review?<br><br>
Questions that need to be directed at the midwife can be directed at the midwife. The existence of an anonymous system wouldn't mean the abolition of personal communication.<br><br>
But I understand what you're saying. For instance, say the mother writes, "the midwife broke my waters without my consent and for no reason at all." And maybe it was actually done by accident, or the midwife did have a reason and it just wasn't communicated. Maybe knowing that would make a difference in judging the events of the story. But the fact that this is what the woman perceived <i>in itself</i> is worthy of being heard and thought on. It doesn't really matter, as far as the lesson to those reading, what the truth was -- even with the midwife's side of the story, we still wouldn't know that for sure. The point is not to nit-pick every little decision and decide whether it was justified or not, the point is to become aware of what experiences women are having, and to begin to question why they are having those types of experiences.<br><br>
For instance, many women feel depressed about a sudden cessation of contact with these people who were intimately a part of one of the most profound experiences of their lives, and feel very confused and conflicted about this. I think most midwives are generally aware that there is a little sadness that occurs with this separation, but don't feel it deeply. I never told my midwives, for various reasons. But what might happen if woman after woman started mentioning it in their after-birth survey, for other mothers and midwives to see? How would that change perceptions, to become aware of the depth and seriousness of it on a grand scale? How might it then change the specifics of how homebirth midwifery is practiced over time?<br><br><div style="margin:20px;margin-top:5px;">
<div class="smallfont" style="margin-bottom:2px;">Quote:</div>
<table border="0" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" width="99%"><tr><td class="alt2" style="border:1px inset;">Yes that can heal. But what about an apology? What if she really needs to hear that she truly has been heard? What about processing? What if what she wants is to know that the midwife did the best she could with what she had and has learned? How do you do that anonymously?</td>
</tr></table></div>
You don't, and like I said, personal communication can happen concurrently, if the mother has a need for it. It was part of my processing/healing process, even though the midwife did not "hear" me nor apologize, I did realize that the midwife was truly just clueless (and maybe in denial,) and I was able to let go of it to some extent. Most of my processing, though, happened in trauma counseling with another midwife, in discussions with my friends and online, and through my own meditations.<br><br><div style="margin:20px;margin-top:5px;">
<div class="smallfont" style="margin-bottom:2px;">Quote:</div>
<table border="0" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" width="99%"><tr><td class="alt2" style="border:1px inset;">Mentorships and healers, midwives, wise people of all kinds: yes I guess you could call it hierachical. But respect is not bad or wrong - recognizing that we don't know something doesn't mean that we are out of touch - it just means we haven't learned yet.</td>
</tr></table></div>
I acknowledged that we are not equals in every sense. But I don't think that one person's lack of knowledge in an area in relation to another's knowledge, implies a natural hierarchy of power and worship. (Worship defined as looking up to someone as beyond or above you in some respect.) Respect is good, but I deserve the same kind of respect as someone who has more knowledge than I do, as does the person who does not yet have the knowledge I do. I guess that is because I do not respect achievement, I respect humanness, humility, and the desire to learn.<br><br><div style="margin:20px;margin-top:5px;">
<div class="smallfont" style="margin-bottom:2px;">Quote:</div>
<table border="0" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" width="99%"><tr><td class="alt2" style="border:1px inset;">(and I have heard it said "for every woman a midwife" interesting...).</td>
</tr></table></div>
As to the meaning of that phrase, which I believe Jeannine Parvati Baker coined (though I could be wrong!): <a href="http://www.freestone.org/articles/Freebirth-EveryMother.html" target="_blank">http://www.freestone.org/articles/Fr...eryMother.html</a><br><br><div style="margin:20px;margin-top:5px;">
<div class="smallfont" style="margin-bottom:2px;">Quote:</div>
<table border="0" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" width="99%"><tr><td class="alt2" style="border:1px inset;">Other cultures (mostly primitive cultures these days) do not do "every woman a midwife" [...] (I think - correct me if I am wrong - there is only one culture wherein the mother must go out and birth alone and in even in that society she is prepared by the wise one's in her culture for the journey).</td>
</tr></table></div>
First, traditional midwifery, whatever its pros and cons, is VERY different from modern midwifery. For my mother and sisters to gather around me in a protective circle and to nuture me is very different from me hiring someone who is essentially a stranger, cultivating an artificially intimate relationship with her so that I can be comfortable with her witnessing me in a profoundly intimate and meaningful event, and having her timing contractions, doing cervical exams, and telling me how and when to push (or whatever interventions she and I feel are necessary.)<br><br>
Second, I'm not aware of any culture in which the mother <i>must</i> birth alone, but a few in which mothers (especially those that have given birth more than once) often do, or with attendants around as protection rather than for guidance. As far as we know, most cultures disturb the birth process by ritualizing or guiding it in some way. But does it necessarily follow that this is normal, best, natural? We have records of very few cultures that are not aggressive, and the ones that are not disturb the process the least. Michel Odent's theory is that this disturbance of the birth process through ritual and guiding serves aggressive societies, rather than the individual. I think this happens in two ways: it creates further aggression by interfering with bonding and making the birth process difficult, and it bonds together the women folk as a protection against the patriarchal (aggressive) structure. Is it possible that we have idealized that "women with women" scenario not because it is best for all individual women, but because we seek to justify social mandates when they are not comfortable?<br><br><div style="margin:20px;margin-top:5px;">
<div class="smallfont" style="margin-bottom:2px;">Quote:</div>
<table border="0" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" width="99%"><tr><td class="alt2" style="border:1px inset;">the mystery - Your statement "No one is saying that we are absolute equals in every sense. But I can say that I know more about my body and what it needs to give birth than your granny midwife ever possibly could. (I don't mean that to sound belligerant, please just take it at face value.)"<br><br>
On the flip side what I hear you say is that she would not have known that too.</td>
</tr></table></div>
That's right. She cannot possibly, as she is outside it, while I am inside it.<br><br><div style="margin:20px;margin-top:5px;">
<div class="smallfont" style="margin-bottom:2px;">Quote:</div>
<table border="0" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" width="99%"><tr><td class="alt2" style="border:1px inset;">And she would also have known how to help you see that (if you didn't already consciously know) and also how to recognize and learn from the mystery.</td>
</tr></table></div>
Perhaps. There is certainly value in midwifery for some women, even if they don't need the midwife to tell her how to give birth.<br><br><div style="margin:20px;margin-top:5px;">
<div class="smallfont" style="margin-bottom:2px;">Quote:</div>
<table border="0" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" width="99%"><tr><td class="alt2" style="border:1px inset;">Midwives have huge egos in western culture and with good reason - we have to be mavericks, bucking the system in so many ways, which trickles down hopefully to the women we serve in helping them buck the system and believe in themselves - because, by golly, we want them to "get-it" as well. And to basically come from that good place - it's hard for us to hear that our practices have gone astray and are hurting women. but we do need to hear it...because ultimately it's not about "Us" (Midwives) or "Me" - it's about something much deeper.</td>
</tr></table></div>
I agree totally.