Joined
·
194 Posts
Starting a new post for this discussion!
Posted by RachelEuphoria:
Thanks, DimitraDaisy. I enjoyed reading that Enki First Grade Readiness document (http://www.enkieducation.org/html/ma...b-sample-b.pdf) and forwarded it to another homeschooling-in-the-future friend. We had planned to use Christopherus, but now I'm thinking I'd like to sample Enki. I have also requested Your Child's Growing Mind from the library. Thanks for the recommendation!
My DD's birthday is Nov 6, and I was thinking of starting 1st grade at 5, almost 6. I know that's considered way too early by Waldorf standards, but it's hard to resist when she's already wanting to write letters and learn to read. Maybe that book will help me understand/decide to wait.
Oh, how I wish I could have her evaluated by a Waldorf teacher. It would be nice to have someone who actually knows her to tell me to wait until she's 6, almost 7. Sigh...
Posted by DimitraDaisy:
Aaah. First Grade readiness is such a big topic. Perhaps we can start another thread about this. I can't tell you to wait until she's almost 7, but I tell you that first grade isn't about learning to read and write. You may want to do that, in fact you may do that, and still need to be in Kindergarten in every other way.
What are your reasons for not wanting to wait? What are your reasons for wanting to wait? And do you have to begin your year in September? You could start in March, with the spring Equinox, and she would be six and four months then. A lot of Enki parents seem to do this. And I have even heard of a Waldorf school who experimented with an "autumn Class 1" and a "winter Class 1". And they were joined for Class 2, apparently! I have to say I don't quite see how this would work, but with homeschooling you have quite a lot of flexibility, so why not?
Posted by BendingBirch:
RachelEuphoria,
I can only offer my support to you as a Waldorf homeschooling mother who has been through the Kindy years and now almost done with First. There is a whole lot more to First Grade than learning the letters and starting to read. If you look at Eugene Scwartz's website www.millenialchild.com he argues there are actually more sensitive windows for math and the need for form drawing once a child approaches 6 and a half or 7 than this window that is going to close for reading.
My child did teach herself to read; first grade has still benefitted her in so many ways. What I have found with small children who can read is that 1-it may replace them wanting to get into their bodies, the hallmark of an under 7 child and you have to really set the tone in this area 2- it sets them on a path where perhaps reading and even foreign languages are easier, but it does not negate the fairy tale stories they need to hear, and there are plenty of ways to incorporate your homeschooling reader into Waldorf first grade 3- just because they like to read does not mean they like to write; Steiner felt all reading should come from writing first. My daughter likes to creatively write her own poems, but as far as her Main Lesson Book goes I would say her writing and wanting to copy sentences and such (without moaning and groaing) probably is close to any other Waldorf first or second grader despite the fact she can read very well and will write longer things on her own.
4- Just because a child can read early does not mean there is much that is appropriate to read for their age. Much of the meatier chapter books do not come for a 7 year old; these books are for a older crowd with protagonists that go through trials and tribulations whom the child can identify with; but a seven year is still very much not ready for that type of identification. 5 - Waldorf moves and teaches through movement, the artistic, and is very hands-on and in our society we have a view of education being mainly reading and writing, which is not even the most effective way to learn things for certain age groups.
What I would suggest is actually reading Steiner himself. I feel "Kingdom of Childhood" "Education of the Child" and even the longer "Soul Economy" are accessible and understandable.
To me, it boils down to this: a child can learn all sorts of things within the first seven years, but SHOULD they? That is the question every parent must decide for themselves. If you believe in the seven year cycles, then you have no problem waiting, you know? And your reading under 7 year old, well, they taught themselves. Children like that suddenly can just read and read fluently and well, my reader is also one of those kids who can just pick up foreign languages as well. She is language oriented. The thing there is to actually protect them from burning out, to find them things that are appropriate, to really focus on the oral storytelling and other things they may be missing or that may be harder for them.
If anything, Waldorf education looks at the WHOLE child. I set goals in about ten different areas, and look at many different things for our educational year. My next child may not read as early as my first, temperament plays into it somewhat, I think gender can as well. The point is though, that the seven year cycles are still the guiding force for the decisions we make as teachers and parents in those first seven years.
Hope that helps a bit, it is just my perspective. Please take what resonates with you and for your family.
Posted by RachelEuphoria:
Thanks, DimitraDaisy. I enjoyed reading that Enki First Grade Readiness document (http://www.enkieducation.org/html/ma...b-sample-b.pdf) and forwarded it to another homeschooling-in-the-future friend. We had planned to use Christopherus, but now I'm thinking I'd like to sample Enki. I have also requested Your Child's Growing Mind from the library. Thanks for the recommendation!
My DD's birthday is Nov 6, and I was thinking of starting 1st grade at 5, almost 6. I know that's considered way too early by Waldorf standards, but it's hard to resist when she's already wanting to write letters and learn to read. Maybe that book will help me understand/decide to wait.
Oh, how I wish I could have her evaluated by a Waldorf teacher. It would be nice to have someone who actually knows her to tell me to wait until she's 6, almost 7. Sigh...
Posted by DimitraDaisy:
Aaah. First Grade readiness is such a big topic. Perhaps we can start another thread about this. I can't tell you to wait until she's almost 7, but I tell you that first grade isn't about learning to read and write. You may want to do that, in fact you may do that, and still need to be in Kindergarten in every other way.
What are your reasons for not wanting to wait? What are your reasons for wanting to wait? And do you have to begin your year in September? You could start in March, with the spring Equinox, and she would be six and four months then. A lot of Enki parents seem to do this. And I have even heard of a Waldorf school who experimented with an "autumn Class 1" and a "winter Class 1". And they were joined for Class 2, apparently! I have to say I don't quite see how this would work, but with homeschooling you have quite a lot of flexibility, so why not?
Posted by BendingBirch:
RachelEuphoria,
I can only offer my support to you as a Waldorf homeschooling mother who has been through the Kindy years and now almost done with First. There is a whole lot more to First Grade than learning the letters and starting to read. If you look at Eugene Scwartz's website www.millenialchild.com he argues there are actually more sensitive windows for math and the need for form drawing once a child approaches 6 and a half or 7 than this window that is going to close for reading.
My child did teach herself to read; first grade has still benefitted her in so many ways. What I have found with small children who can read is that 1-it may replace them wanting to get into their bodies, the hallmark of an under 7 child and you have to really set the tone in this area 2- it sets them on a path where perhaps reading and even foreign languages are easier, but it does not negate the fairy tale stories they need to hear, and there are plenty of ways to incorporate your homeschooling reader into Waldorf first grade 3- just because they like to read does not mean they like to write; Steiner felt all reading should come from writing first. My daughter likes to creatively write her own poems, but as far as her Main Lesson Book goes I would say her writing and wanting to copy sentences and such (without moaning and groaing) probably is close to any other Waldorf first or second grader despite the fact she can read very well and will write longer things on her own.
4- Just because a child can read early does not mean there is much that is appropriate to read for their age. Much of the meatier chapter books do not come for a 7 year old; these books are for a older crowd with protagonists that go through trials and tribulations whom the child can identify with; but a seven year is still very much not ready for that type of identification. 5 - Waldorf moves and teaches through movement, the artistic, and is very hands-on and in our society we have a view of education being mainly reading and writing, which is not even the most effective way to learn things for certain age groups.
What I would suggest is actually reading Steiner himself. I feel "Kingdom of Childhood" "Education of the Child" and even the longer "Soul Economy" are accessible and understandable.
To me, it boils down to this: a child can learn all sorts of things within the first seven years, but SHOULD they? That is the question every parent must decide for themselves. If you believe in the seven year cycles, then you have no problem waiting, you know? And your reading under 7 year old, well, they taught themselves. Children like that suddenly can just read and read fluently and well, my reader is also one of those kids who can just pick up foreign languages as well. She is language oriented. The thing there is to actually protect them from burning out, to find them things that are appropriate, to really focus on the oral storytelling and other things they may be missing or that may be harder for them.
If anything, Waldorf education looks at the WHOLE child. I set goals in about ten different areas, and look at many different things for our educational year. My next child may not read as early as my first, temperament plays into it somewhat, I think gender can as well. The point is though, that the seven year cycles are still the guiding force for the decisions we make as teachers and parents in those first seven years.
Hope that helps a bit, it is just my perspective. Please take what resonates with you and for your family.