Joined
·
9 Posts
Here is an article about a study on circumcision w/o anesthetics. It was halted due to the torture it put babies through:
http://www.cnn.com/HEALTH/9712/23/ci...on.anesthetic/
If they stopped this study due to the horror it inflicted on the infants, how come circumcisions are still done without pain relief? How come there is no ban on circumcisions w/o anetshetics?
Of course this also begs the question of how a study like this could be ethical to begin with (and what mothers were willing to subject their babies to it), but then I'm not surprised given the fact this goes on on a daily basis in hospitals all over the country.
http://www.cnn.com/HEALTH/9712/23/ci...on.anesthetic/
If they stopped this study due to the horror it inflicted on the infants, how come circumcisions are still done without pain relief? How come there is no ban on circumcisions w/o anetshetics?
Of course this also begs the question of how a study like this could be ethical to begin with (and what mothers were willing to subject their babies to it), but then I'm not surprised given the fact this goes on on a daily basis in hospitals all over the country.
