It is incredibly scary when you are informed of the risks, isn't it! What I'm hearing you say is that you do not feel heard. You need to feel safe when you are in labor. Your need for safety isn't going to be met at a hospital. The only person accountable for you is you. If you aren't communicating with your husband--start now. Acknowlege his fear--it is real, and it is deep. It is just as real as your fear of going to the hospital again. You need to be heard in this--it's your birth. I have a friend who *did* have her uterus rupture---and the dr. didn't know it for an HOUR and a HALF---and this is in a hospital with all the stupid bells and whistles. She and her baby almost did die---in the most obstetrically advanced medical facility around. The hospital many times, only gives an appearance of perceived "safety." For normal births, we know better. IMO, you are best off where YOU feel most safe. I'm certainly not saying that your dh's fears aren't important, they are---it's just that it might be very helpful to start really getting to the bottom of this issue---soon. Some people need reassurance, some need to meet the m/w, some need to meet other hb moms/dads, some need facts and figures, some need to have faith. Which is your dh? Here are some interesting stats:
According to a World Health Organization (WHO) report - subsection on Place of Birth: _
"It has never been scientifically proven that the hospital is a safer place than home for a woman who has had an uncomplicated pregnancy to have her baby. Studies of planned home births in developed countries with women who have had uncomplicated pregnancies have shown sickness and death rates for mother and baby equal to or better than hospital birth statistics for women with uncomplicated pregnancies."_
According to this published study: Mehl, L., Peterson, G., Shaw, N.S., Creavy, D. (1978) "Outcomes of 1146 elective home births: a series of 1146 cases." Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 19:281-90: _
_
Neonatal Outcomes:
*In the hospital, 3.7 times as many babies required resuscitation.
*Infection rates of newborns were 4 times higher in the hospital.
*There were 2.5 times as many cases of meconium aspiration pneumonia in the hospital group.
*There were 6 cases of neonatal lungwater syndrome in the hospital and none at home.
*Babies were 30 times more likely to sustain physical injury in the hospital. There were 30 birth injuries (mostly due to forceps) in the hospital group, and none at home.
*The incidence of respiratory distress among newborns was 17 times greater in the hospital than in the home.
*While neonatal and perinatal death rates were statistically the same for both groups, Apgar scores (a measure of physical well being of the newborn) were significantly worse in the hospital.
The Maternal Outcomes of the Mehl Study show mothers in hospitals have a five-fold increase of maternal hypertension during labor and a three times higher rate of postpartum hemorrhage than mothers at home. According to Mehl, 1977, the low use of obstetric interventions during planned homebirths explains the discrepancy between hospital and home outcomes. _
Here are some significant homebirth/hospital evidence-based research studies:_
*Wiegers, T. A., M J N C Keirse, J. van der Zee, and G. A H. Berghs. 1996. "Outcome of Planned Home and Planned Hospital Births in Low Risk Pregnancies: Prospective Study in Midwifery Practices in the Netherlands." British Medical Journal 313:1309-1313. _
_
* Ackermann-Liebrich, Ursula, Thomas Voegeli, Kathrin Gunter-Witt, Isabelle Kunz, Maja Zullig, Christian Schindler, and Margrit Maurer. 1996. "Home versus Hospital Deliveries: Follow-up Study of Matched Pairs for Procedures and Outcome." British Medical Journal 313:1313-1318. _
_
* Schlenzka, Peter F., "Safety of Alternative Approaches to Childbirth", Stanford University, 1999, available on the web at
http://www.vbfree.org/docs/meadsum.html
Obstet Gynecol 1998 Sep;92(3):461-470, Murphy PA, Fullerton J.
CONCLUSION: Home birth can be accomplished with good outcomes under the care of qualified practitioners and within a system that facilitates transfer to hospital care when necessary. Intrapartal mortality during intended home birth is concentrated in postdates pregnancies with evidence of meconium passage._
Meta-analysis of the safety of home birth:_
_
Birth 1997 Mar;24(1):4-13; discussion 14-6, Olsen, O
What is the relative safety of homebirth compared with hospital birth? Ole Olsen, a researcher from the University of Copenhagen, recently examined several studies of planned homebirth backed up by a modern hospital system compared with planned hospital birth. A total of nearly 25,000 births from five different countries were studied.
The results: There was no difference in survival rates between the babies born at home and those born in the hospital. However, there were several significant differences between the two groups. Fewer medical interventions occurred in the homebirth group. Fewer home-born babies were born in poor condition. The homebirth mothers were less likely to have suffered lacerations during birth. They were less likely to have had their labors induced or augmented by medications or to have had cesarean sections, forceps or vacuum extractor deliveries. As for maternal deaths, there were none in either group.