I'm a huge supporter of UC, BSD, but I also love midwives (and want to be one!). I absolutely think that UC is the best/only way to go for some women, and that midwives have so much to learn from UC, but it's
not in some absolute sense "the best" or the "the only" way to birth
for all women, in my opinion. The only flaw I see in the freebirth community, which when I'm being honest I see in the homebirth/midwife community too, is to make exagerated generalizations about how
their way is best
for everyone, with the implication that there's something "wrong" or "lesser" about people who choose a different path. I don't think we have the statistical numbers about UC to make the same argument midwifery supporters do, saying "yes, but this actually
is safer than hospital birth for the vast majority of births!" but then UC isn't about stats and numbers and odds for most people I've talked to. It's about trust, and protecting and celebrating the sacred, intimate, and private act of birth, and because I believe in all those things, and that the very act of trusting makes birth safer, I'm willing to bet that women who want to UC are acting in their and their babies' best interest in terms of "stats" and safety.
But unless and until I see those stats that say UC is even better in terms of outcome than midwifery-attended birth, I'm not willing to say it's "better" in an absolute sense - better for
some women, better in terms of both creating and resulting from deep birth and body trust, but there will ALWAYS be women who want their partners around, who want midwives around, who want their whole family around, who want high technology around.
And that's ok. There doesn't have to be
one way for everyone - not all choices are equal in terms of safety or outcome or the subjective experience, but there are many, many valid, safe options, and they should
all be supported and the differences celebrated.
In my always humble opinion.