Mothering Forum banner

1 - 20 of 269 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
8,851 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 · (Edited)
Dead in here.

I know there are lots of reasons why...but I am interested in exploring if the idea the lines are drawn is one of them.

A number of moons ago, perhaps earlier in the internet era, people did come here for information and to try and sort out together what was what.

The internet has been around a while now...and either you buy the party line, don't, or are somewhere in between. Either way, short of truly compelling evidence, you are settled in your opinion. There is not really much left to discuss.

"So let's leave it alone, 'cause we can't see eye to eye
There ain't no good guy, there ain't no bad guy
There's only you and me and we just disagree" Dave Mason

or

"I’m through with doubt
There’s nothing left for me to figure out
I’ve paid a price
And I’ll keep paying

I’m not ready to make nice
I’m not ready to back down
I’m still mad as hell and
I don’t have time to go round and round and round"

Dixie chicks.

Have a good Sunday, all!!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
18,824 Posts
I think there are two or three factors.

There aren't very many people left who are willing to actively post of the side of vaccines in this forum. It is hard work. Most places, if you want to support vaccines, all you need to do is say "science" and then say mean things about people who criticize vaccines. Here you've got to actually have credible arguments.

Plus, I think there are some very strong arguments being presented, quite coherently, on the vaccine critics end. The point about the scientific consensus around eugenics/racism was deeply upsetting to the vaccine critics, mostly because it made a big hole in the wonders of scientific consensus, but also because it really is a distasteful picture of where science can go wrong. Painful to people who really want to believe you can trust modern majority rule science.

Finally, lately, links to blog articles from the leading vaccine supporters are not met with positive responses--the demands that people speak in their own voices rather than just quoting from someone else and then saying "what do you think?" are inhibiting the starts of new threads. The same thing happens in the other direction. When someone links to a blog by a vaccine critic we get complaints about it being rude or abusive or anti-woman or unscientific.

Just some thoughts on why things might currently be sort of peaceful.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
24,719 Posts
I have noticed that many discussions have become predictable; we have hashed out many points of view regarding vaccines.

Over the last few months I have found many issues to post, but I know what the responses will be, so I leave them out.

We have a waiting game going with the SB277 court case; the movie "Vaxxed" is on tour, and much of what they are doing has all ready been discussed.

The movie, "Vaxxed, ..." is on a long list of nominees for documentary film for the Academy.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,628 Posts
I think that it is quiet in here is a reflection of what is going on in the media.

No point in throwing money around trying to compete with what is a circus of an election. Oh sure there are the usual flu season predictions - "THE. WORST.FLU.SEASON.EVER.GET.YOUR.FLU.SHOT.TODAY" kinda stuff. But putting out "the sky is falling again because of the anti-vaxxers" is just going to get buried under wikileaks emails and accusations of sexual harassment/assault. They might be saving it for after the election.

No stories in the media, no fodder for the blogs, nothing to see here folks.

I am also hoping that maybe with all the personal stories coming from the VAXXED social media accounts, the wind has been taken out of the vaccine pusher's sails (talking about the corporate entities and not people here).
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
880 Posts
Dead in here.

I know there are lots of reasons why...but I am interested in exploring if the idea the lines are drawn is one of them.

A number of moons ago, perhaps earlier in the internet era, people did come here for information and to try and sort out together what was what.

The internet has been around a while now...and either you buy the party line, don't, or are somewhere in between. Either way, short of truly compelling evidence, you are settled in your opinion. There is not really much left to discuss.

"So let's leave it alone, 'cause we can't see eye to eye
There ain't no good guy, there ain't no bad guy
There's only you and me and we just disagree" Dave Mason

or

"I’m through with doubt
There’s nothing left for me to figure out
I’ve paid a price
And I’ll keep paying

I’m not ready to make nice
I’m not ready to back down
I’m still mad as hell and
I don’t have time to go round and round and round"

Dixie chicks.

Have a good Sunday, all!!
Well, I think some people really wanted to "debate" and increased guidelines for civility make that less fun.

Lord only knows where it'll be after the election.

Myself, I was just out communing with the super moon. My friends who interest themselves in such things tell me we are beginning an energy shift.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
605 Posts
As think I've said before, just because of time constraints, I pretty much only respond to posts when they involve a very narrow, specific topic, and I can respond based on what's in the post and what's in my own brain. (I might read a single linked article if it's something I'm particularly interested in.) It seems like there are fewer of those posts lately. Which is fine, but it's why I don't post much.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,724 Posts
Back to term time at uni and I'm teaching a full load for the first time! Thought I was busy before - nothing to now!

Silence is very far from agreement, and there are so many good arguments against a lot of what's posted here. But like Jennifer said there's just only so much energy I can expend on these boards at times.

Kittens are still cute.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
8,851 Posts
Discussion Starter · #10 ·
If y'all get bored, we can always add a debate section. >:D
So we can play beat each other up for who knows what end? Nah. I am done with that.

Do it if you want to, though. Truly :) I know you need to do what you need to do for boards to survive/thrive.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,075 Posts
So we can play beat each other up for who knows what end? Nah. I am done with that.

Do it if you want to, though. Truly :) I know you need to do what you need to do for boards to survive/thrive.
That isn't how I interpret a debate section. If you watch debate team competitions, for example, that's not how it is.

I see it as just being more open to a bigger variety of topics instead of being bound by the fairly narrow constraints here (no advocating, etc).

Let's be honest, this forum is already basically a debate forum.... we are just restricted on what topics we can discuss and how we present them (and no, I do not just mean mandatory vaccination which I know would still not be allowed in a debate section).

It could be fun to try it out. Of course, anyone who wasn't interested wouldn't have to participate.

The narrow constraints here does make the forum pretty boring at times, tbh.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
8,851 Posts
Discussion Starter · #12 ·
That isn't how I interpret a debate section. If you watch debate team competitions, for example, that's not how it is.

.
It would depend on how cricket envisioned a debate section. Looser rules and moderation have historically resulted in nastiness on MDC.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Anne Jividen

·
Registered
Joined
·
18,824 Posts
That isn't how I interpret a debate section. If you watch debate team competitions, for example, that's not how it is.

I see it as just being more open to a bigger variety of topics instead of being bound by the fairly narrow constraints here (no advocating, etc).

Let's be honest, this forum is already basically a debate forum.... we are just restricted on what topics we can discuss and how we present them (and no, I do not just mean mandatory vaccination which I know would still not be allowed in a debate section).

It could be fun to try it out. Of course, anyone who wasn't interested wouldn't have to participate.

The narrow constraints here does make the forum pretty boring at times, tbh.
Could you give some specific examples of topics you feel are neglected?

I find that many of my attempts to broaden topics fall flat.

For example, I started a thread to look at whether science makes policy or policy makes science, with examples. Not of interest.

Many threads that are started have 1 or 2 posts and that is all. Sometimes they are on points that aren't usually discussed.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,075 Posts
As a very recent example I think the "CDC" bird flipper could have been fun to discuss. I knew it would not fit here and get flagged, and it got flagged in the only other section we have to discuss topics with members who aren't just VOS. Which...ok. It's fine in VOS but think it could have been interesting to discuss with INV members too. I've had NUMEROUS threads in this section get either closed down completely or that had to be completely reworded and changed the focus of because people flagged it for advocating, etc. I've even messaged @Deborah more than once about it. Usually, I think it's just pettiness from some members, if I'm being honest. The threads themselves were not nasty or rude, but still got flagged.

I think having a "debate" section that still held the core rules of the forum (no personally attacking or name calling, no advocating for mandatory vaccines, etc) but with a much more broad allowance of a variety of topics and a little less hand holding from the mods could be fun and interesting. There have many times where I thought a certain article was interesting but decided not to bring it here because it would only really fit with VOS under the current forum guidelines.

Just my 2 cents, anyway.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
8,849 Posts
NO to any debate section!!!!!!! - my opinion and I thought this was expressed by many members on here as to why they DID NOT want it!
One reason to not want to be on here! And flippant remarks that kittens are cute is deeply offensive, a medical choice can not, nor should it be ridiculed with nonsense remarks like these, again IMO. To vaccinate is a deeply personal & serious matter. Other place are for cute kittens!!!

Other topics, have always (IMO) been a way to stretch advocating, plain & simple! Flip of the CDC, perfect example and reason to NOT participate! This should be serious concern and issues related to members not frivolous childish need to chit-chat. There are numerous other places if one is lonely and needs to engage with those of the opposition.

IRL deaths tend to keep some off of here & busy and no need to have to come on & explain.

Many DO read when they are not posting.

If this is only to drive numbers, that very sad!
@kathymuggle & the rest in Canada, belated Thsnksgiving greetings!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
605 Posts
I'm all for a debate section. To be totally honest, I don't understand why this section isn't a debate section, nor do I understand how to reasonably draw a line between what's discussion of a topic between people who disagree about it (permissible) and what's "debate" (impermissible). But I accept that that ship has sailed.

If we do have a separate debate forum, I think it should have the same standards of civility as the main forum--no nastiness or personal attacks, and minimal sarcasm. Which should be fine, because those things aren't necessary for debate.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
8,487 Posts
If y'all get bored, we can always add a debate section. >:D
Way to stir the chili, @CricketVS The irony of you starting this, um, debate hasn't escaped me. :Sheepish Anyway, if you go for it, you have my support. :goodvibes
 
  • Like
Reactions: Anne Jividen

·
Administrator
Joined
·
2,064 Posts
Way to stir the chili, @CricketVS The irony of you starting this, um, debate hasn't escaped me. :Sheepish Anyway, if you go for it, you have my support. :goodvibes
My comment was pretty tongue in cheek, which is why I added the devilish smiley.

We would need a large percentage of those who are active in the vaccination forum to want this for me to consider it.
 
1 - 20 of 269 Posts
Top