Joined
·
2,263 Posts
My sister had her first baby, then I had my first, then she had her second a few months after mine.
Her first child was fairly small, fussy, and had a terrible time with latching. Her supply was never a problem - she can pump 40+ oz a day. They tried for about six weeks then declared the baby "allergic to breastmilk" and weaned.
I had my son and planned to exclusively BF. He seemed to have gotten the latch down right off, but after an alarming visit to the ped (he hadn't regained his birth weight after over four weeks), we started visiting a LC. He was only getting an ounce and a half from me at a time, so we had to supplement. I went to her every week until he was about three and a half months old, took fenugreek and ate oatmeal, rented a Lactina for three months until I bought a PISA, and spent 1.5 out of every three hours either nursing, bottle-feeding, or pumping. I've never been able to pump more than 4 oz at a time, and that was when I was still at home and religiously pumping every three hours - at the time he was eating 8oz at a feeding, but still not able to get more than 2oz through nursing. We still have to supplement at every feeding. I hate having to do it, but I've come to accept the fact that he'll get every ounce of breastmilk I can give him, but I can't do it without formula.
When my sister's second child was on the way, it was obvious that the baby would be a lot bigger than the first one, but it was also apparent that she wasn't going to last long BF. Whenever the topic came up, my BIL was constantly making sarcastic comments about the "benefits" of BF. One of my sister's friends (a SAHM) had her second child when my sister had her first, and since it was so terribly inconvenient to try to entertain a toddler and BF a baby, they only made it two weeks - that didn't sound too bad to my sister. They had a L&D nurse that told them that her son was FF, and "he's not sniffing glue." When the baby was born, he latched without a problem. As I've mentioned before, supply is not an issue with my sister. By the time he was a week old, she'd stopped letting him BF and was pumping and bottle-feeding instead. By the time he was a month old, they'd switched him to formula because "she was just so engorged all the time," (duh) and because he started having gas. I don't think a week or so is long enough to try an elimination diet, is it? I never had to try it, because my son never got enough from me to upset his tummy
So why is it okay for them (esp. my BIL) to rant about how the benefits of BF are BS, and their kids are just fine, and it doesn't make a difference, and this is why they did it, but it's not okay for me to say anything about the scientifically documented benefits? If my sister griped about engorgement and I started to mention supply and demand, I'd get my head bitten off by my mother. I wasn't exactly preaching at them, either - it was only after my sister brought it up. They seem to have a great deal of bitterness towards BF advocacy. I tried so hard to be nonjudgementally supportive of BF before she had the second baby, and I've had to bite my tongue so many times since then...especially since he's now got reflux and has to take Zantac and Reglan for it. It's a good thing he's not getting that nasty breastmilk that gave him gas, isn't it?
:
It doesn't seem to matter to any of them that I've struggled with my son's ability to BF for six months. Even my husband thinks I'm being oversensitive for getting upset about the snarky comments. I come from a close family, so it's especially difficult. It hurts...from the get-go, everyone seemed to accept that I couldn't BF properly and asked if I'd fed him yet (referring to his FF) as if that were the real feeding, not having him at my breast. They all wanted to give him his bottle, so they'd be standing over me waiting for me to stop playing at BF.
I admit that I think my BIL and sister's reasons are rationalizations. Those are their children to do with as they will. I guess I'm hoping for some reassurance that I'm not being oversensitive at not wanting to hear their stupid rationalizations when I'd do anything to have had the "problems" they've had.
Her first child was fairly small, fussy, and had a terrible time with latching. Her supply was never a problem - she can pump 40+ oz a day. They tried for about six weeks then declared the baby "allergic to breastmilk" and weaned.
I had my son and planned to exclusively BF. He seemed to have gotten the latch down right off, but after an alarming visit to the ped (he hadn't regained his birth weight after over four weeks), we started visiting a LC. He was only getting an ounce and a half from me at a time, so we had to supplement. I went to her every week until he was about three and a half months old, took fenugreek and ate oatmeal, rented a Lactina for three months until I bought a PISA, and spent 1.5 out of every three hours either nursing, bottle-feeding, or pumping. I've never been able to pump more than 4 oz at a time, and that was when I was still at home and religiously pumping every three hours - at the time he was eating 8oz at a feeding, but still not able to get more than 2oz through nursing. We still have to supplement at every feeding. I hate having to do it, but I've come to accept the fact that he'll get every ounce of breastmilk I can give him, but I can't do it without formula.
When my sister's second child was on the way, it was obvious that the baby would be a lot bigger than the first one, but it was also apparent that she wasn't going to last long BF. Whenever the topic came up, my BIL was constantly making sarcastic comments about the "benefits" of BF. One of my sister's friends (a SAHM) had her second child when my sister had her first, and since it was so terribly inconvenient to try to entertain a toddler and BF a baby, they only made it two weeks - that didn't sound too bad to my sister. They had a L&D nurse that told them that her son was FF, and "he's not sniffing glue." When the baby was born, he latched without a problem. As I've mentioned before, supply is not an issue with my sister. By the time he was a week old, she'd stopped letting him BF and was pumping and bottle-feeding instead. By the time he was a month old, they'd switched him to formula because "she was just so engorged all the time," (duh) and because he started having gas. I don't think a week or so is long enough to try an elimination diet, is it? I never had to try it, because my son never got enough from me to upset his tummy

So why is it okay for them (esp. my BIL) to rant about how the benefits of BF are BS, and their kids are just fine, and it doesn't make a difference, and this is why they did it, but it's not okay for me to say anything about the scientifically documented benefits? If my sister griped about engorgement and I started to mention supply and demand, I'd get my head bitten off by my mother. I wasn't exactly preaching at them, either - it was only after my sister brought it up. They seem to have a great deal of bitterness towards BF advocacy. I tried so hard to be nonjudgementally supportive of BF before she had the second baby, and I've had to bite my tongue so many times since then...especially since he's now got reflux and has to take Zantac and Reglan for it. It's a good thing he's not getting that nasty breastmilk that gave him gas, isn't it?

It doesn't seem to matter to any of them that I've struggled with my son's ability to BF for six months. Even my husband thinks I'm being oversensitive for getting upset about the snarky comments. I come from a close family, so it's especially difficult. It hurts...from the get-go, everyone seemed to accept that I couldn't BF properly and asked if I'd fed him yet (referring to his FF) as if that were the real feeding, not having him at my breast. They all wanted to give him his bottle, so they'd be standing over me waiting for me to stop playing at BF.
I admit that I think my BIL and sister's reasons are rationalizations. Those are their children to do with as they will. I guess I'm hoping for some reassurance that I'm not being oversensitive at not wanting to hear their stupid rationalizations when I'd do anything to have had the "problems" they've had.