Mothering Forum banner

Do you know anyone who was circ'd for a REAL medical reason?

1315 Views 21 Replies 20 Participants Last post by  BamaDude
I know one. My BF had an unfortunate run-in with a glass-topped table at the age of 5 and his foreskin was used to help reconstruct his penis (it's fine now). I'd consider that a good reason to circumcise. Even at the age of 5, he barely remembers the surgery, says it was not that painful (guess he got lots of good meds), and he does NOT advocate or approve of circ for non-medical reasons.

So there's at least one guy who defies the "But it's SO much painful when they're older!" and "I knew this guy who had it done as a child and wished his parents had done it earlier!" arguments.

Does anyone else know someone that was circ'd for a real reason?
1 - 20 of 22 Posts
its a good thing he was not circ'd as a baby...he would not have had the extra skin to do the reconstruction...wow...

peace...
3
Quote:

Originally Posted by Monkeygrrl View Post
its a good thing he was not circ'd as a baby...he would not have had the extra skin to do the reconstruction...wow...

peace...
:

I did know someone circ'ed at the age of 25 (not a good reason, IMO, it was for recurring UTI) and he didnt complain much of pain either...found it amusing that they ordered him not to have any erections for a few weeks...so he'd tell us not to bend over in front of him
(it was a coworker)
See less See more
Nope. Every intact man I have known with a "medical problem" (yeast/urinary tract infection) was easily treated with medication.
2
Nope... my uncle was circumcised because he was forceably retracted (I'm assuming that's why he had foreskin "problems" given the time period he was born during - retraction at every diaper change was common medical advice at the time) and a friend of mine chose to be circumcised when he was 19 or 20 because his girlfriend wanted him to
It was his decision though and he was glad that HE got to make it and that his parents left him intact.

love and peace.
See less See more
Well, my husband was not circed for any "real" reason, besides pure ignorance on his mother's part.

But he was cut at age 11, and he pretty much shot down the "it's-so-much-worse-when-they-are-older" argument for me. He said the only thing he remembers was that they told him not to eat salty things, but his dad felt so sorry for him that he managed to convince his dad to go get him some fries from mcdonalds, and he was in bad pain for that, but he blames himself for that, he said after the salt was out of his system, it wasn't all that bad.

But he resents that the choice was not left up to him, and was done for absolutely no reason other than "it needs to be done before middle school"
: He's now restoring.
See less See more
Nope I dont know anyone. Hmm would you mind if I made this into a poll OP?
No. Not even for a spurious "medical" reason.

And everyone around me is intact.
I'm the UK so apart from the odd male who was circed for religious reasons almost everyone I know is intact.

I do however know two men who had it done in their early twenties after continual problems with a tight foreskin. In both cases treatment with steroid creams to thin the foreskin failed and they needed surgery. One suffered quite badly for months afterwards, one was fine.
2
everyone i know was circ'ed for some stupid reason
: and the more i think about it the sadder it makes me
: ...i'm glad that i broke that sad cycle w/DS
See less See more
No, I don't. As far as I know all the circed men/boys I know were circed as newborns.
I don't know anyone circumcised for a "REAL MEDICAL REASON", but I do know two in my family who were circumcised for spurious reasons.

GF was circumcised at the age of 12 because "his foreskin got so tight he could not pee" - this makes no sense and I can only think that he suffered a paraphimosis, which, in the old days, the Drs often resolved by circumcision, rather than just putting the foreskin back in its forward position. Just a guess though.

DS was circumcised at the age of 11 after an infection, and the subsequent discovery that his foreskin, which had previously been retractable, was now tight like a newborns again. This was long before the net and no information was available, so I only had "gut feeling" to fight the Dr with, and sadly I lost . Even more sadly - so did my DS. It still absolutely infuriates me to think that those urologists were so IGNORANT and UNINFORMED as to not even know about some of the conservative procedures that are in use today. Some of the papers at www.cirp.org had been published in the early '80s.
See less See more
gives new meaning to an old phrase: Don't cut off your nose to spite your face.
3
Quote:

Originally Posted by trmpetplaya View Post
Nope... my uncle was circumcised because he was forceably retracted (I'm assuming that's why he had foreskin "problems" given the time period he was born during - retraction at every diaper change was common medical advice at the time) and a friend of mine chose to be circumcised when he was 19 or 20 because his girlfriend wanted him to
It was his decision though and he was glad that HE got to make it and that his parents left him intact.

love and peace.

Does your friend regret circing for his girlfriend?
See less See more
Quote:

Originally Posted by minkajane View Post
Even at the age of 5, he barely remembers the surgery, says it was not that painful (guess he got lots of good meds), and he does NOT advocate or approve of circ for non-medical reasons.

So there's at least one guy who defies the "But it's SO much painful when they're older!" and "I knew this guy who had it done as a child and wished his parents had done it earlier!" arguments.

Does anyone else know someone that was circ'd for a real reason?
No, but I was re-circ'd at 6 for no good reason. It probably wasn't a walk in the park at the time, but like your bf I don't carry any long-term memory of horrific pain. Those people that claim that are a bunch of overly dramatic crybabies. What I do carry with me is the botch job of a penis they left me, and there was absolutely no reason for it.
See less See more
There was this teenage boy in DH's middle school who apparently had a surgery done because he suffered terrible pain when he had erections and when he had to pee (I think). DH remembers when the teacher took the opportunity to explain the uses of the foreskin that day in class. I am not sure what other kind of procedures are done for the problem this boy had. This was in Denmark by the way, where circumcision is very unusual.
2
Well, I don't "know" this guy, but I've read his book!
Joe Jackson was circumcised as a young man for phimosis. That was in England.

Okay, I went to grab the book (A Cure For Gravity) to recall the details correctly. His GP called it "the chop."

Quote:
A couple of hours later I was put under general anaesthetic. But something went wrong. I woke up before the surgery was over. In a few seconds of consciousness, which were like a Hieronymus Bosch vision of hell, I looked down and saw my poor beleaguered member covered in blood, and the bug-eyed face of the surgeon turning, in slow motion, towards me.

When I resurfaced, I was lying in bed, pumped full of Valium so that I would not panic but stay merely depressed. I'd been mutilated but I didn't care all that much. I was also given drugs to prevent sexual arousal so that, when a pretty young nurse changed my dressing, I wouldn't tear the stitches.

I was visited by my mother and, on one occasion, Graham Maby.

"How do you feel?" he asked.

I had been disfigured for life and I would never have sex.

"How do you think I bloody feel?" I muttered.

Graham thought for a moment. "Lighter?" he suggested.
My husband just pointed out that our copy of The Damnation of Faust has a Bosch depiction of hell. Poor Joe Jackson!
See less See more
Jackson also mentions that within a few weeks, he began to realize he'd done the right thing. He'd originally thought of circumcision as an unpleasant prospect that he'd have to get over with if he ever wanted to have sex with anyone. He felt mutilated and disfigured after the fact, but when his post-recovery erections were painless and the possibility of sex (he still was a virgin at the time of the surgery) became appealing again, he realized it had been the right thing.

I don't think he viewed it as anything other than treatment for a painful condition. I certainly doubt that he's pro-circ in general. I don't know if they considered anything less extreme. This surgery was awhile ago.
2
Quote:

Originally Posted by lyttlewon View Post
Does your friend regret circing for his girlfriend?
Yes, though I'm not sure how much of his regret has to do with the fact that she dumped him soon afterwards... it's also (quite understandably) not something that he likes to talk about. When I last talked to him about it, it had been less than a year since he'd had it done so I doubt much keratinization had happened yet. It would be interesting to talk to him about it now that it's been 4-5 years, but he's really not comfortable talking about it so I haven't brought it up... it was like pulling teeth to find out what I did before.

Though at that time, having recently gone through the surgery, he still was grateful that his parents left the decision up to him. He wasn't resentful that they didn't have it done at birth the way pro-circumcision folks argue intact boys will feel.

love and peace.
See less See more
1 - 20 of 22 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top