Joined
·
1,495 Posts
I keep getting enfamil samples in the mail. Per the box:<br><br>
'The truth is, [cow's] milk lacks some key nutrients toddlers need. Next Step Lipil gives you a better alternative. 9-24 months."<br><br>
So, not only are they pushing formula, but are also implying that 9 mo olds should be drinking either cow's milk or formula?<br><br>
I was getting ready to make "Return to sender" and write "baby is breastfed" on the box... but then I thought:<br>
1) probably they have contracted the shipping out to a company who does not care at all what my baby eats<br>
2) wouldn't it be better to give this formula to another mom so that she does't pay for a can? (if she's going to be buying it anyway?) If what enfamil cares about is making money, then the most "lactivist" thing to do is to cost them the most, right? What do you think?<br><br>
Bethany
'The truth is, [cow's] milk lacks some key nutrients toddlers need. Next Step Lipil gives you a better alternative. 9-24 months."<br><br>
So, not only are they pushing formula, but are also implying that 9 mo olds should be drinking either cow's milk or formula?<br><br>
I was getting ready to make "Return to sender" and write "baby is breastfed" on the box... but then I thought:<br>
1) probably they have contracted the shipping out to a company who does not care at all what my baby eats<br>
2) wouldn't it be better to give this formula to another mom so that she does't pay for a can? (if she's going to be buying it anyway?) If what enfamil cares about is making money, then the most "lactivist" thing to do is to cost them the most, right? What do you think?<br><br>
Bethany