Remind me of your health history?
The thing is, I always first check Cutler's counting rules, because if any of his rules are met, the likelihood is that mercury is affecting the person's ability to use nutrients and then it's a lot harder to interpret the regular minerals (sometimes they're helpful, sometimes not--I see a mix with my daughter, but I can only tell because she has other symptoms of mag and zinc being low).
Here's a link to the MDC page that discusses his counting rules.
http://mothering.com/discussions/sho...435848&page=30
One of the rules is that if 4 or more results go into the red zone (and to me it looks like molybdenum is just at the border, which is the beginning of the red zone), then that's 4, and mercury is likely involved.
See, I'm sitting here feeling bad, cause I'm not sure that's what you were expecting. His rules are statistically based, so there is a small statistical likelihood that's not the answer, but I'd think being in this forum and having health questions that cause you to do a hair test make that less likely.
The aluminum--it's a bit high but not really worrisome, but it usually comes down on its own as we eliminate sources (cooking pans, various processed foods--but you're in this forum, you're not likely feeding your kid kraft cheese-food slices, like that--there are more comprehensive lists around, and it could be on its way down already), and it's usually elevated with mercury.
Mostly toxic element results in the yellow (at least the bottom half of the yellow) aren't worrisome unless the person has symptoms that correspond, but lead is the exception. It's good that his is in the green, it'd be better if it eventually trended lower in the green.
I can look up some of the other minerals, see which are likely to be real and which we just can't know about (I'd doubt copper is actually low, that would be quite odd), stuff like that, and see if any of the ratios are helpful (some ratios like sodium and potassium and stuff can be helpful). But first I'm supposed to be working on our taxes.
:
So, did I just mess with your world?
The thing is, I always first check Cutler's counting rules, because if any of his rules are met, the likelihood is that mercury is affecting the person's ability to use nutrients and then it's a lot harder to interpret the regular minerals (sometimes they're helpful, sometimes not--I see a mix with my daughter, but I can only tell because she has other symptoms of mag and zinc being low).
Here's a link to the MDC page that discusses his counting rules.
http://mothering.com/discussions/sho...435848&page=30
One of the rules is that if 4 or more results go into the red zone (and to me it looks like molybdenum is just at the border, which is the beginning of the red zone), then that's 4, and mercury is likely involved.
See, I'm sitting here feeling bad, cause I'm not sure that's what you were expecting. His rules are statistically based, so there is a small statistical likelihood that's not the answer, but I'd think being in this forum and having health questions that cause you to do a hair test make that less likely.
The aluminum--it's a bit high but not really worrisome, but it usually comes down on its own as we eliminate sources (cooking pans, various processed foods--but you're in this forum, you're not likely feeding your kid kraft cheese-food slices, like that--there are more comprehensive lists around, and it could be on its way down already), and it's usually elevated with mercury.
Mostly toxic element results in the yellow (at least the bottom half of the yellow) aren't worrisome unless the person has symptoms that correspond, but lead is the exception. It's good that his is in the green, it'd be better if it eventually trended lower in the green.
I can look up some of the other minerals, see which are likely to be real and which we just can't know about (I'd doubt copper is actually low, that would be quite odd), stuff like that, and see if any of the ratios are helpful (some ratios like sodium and potassium and stuff can be helpful). But first I'm supposed to be working on our taxes.

So, did I just mess with your world?