Mothering Forum banner
1 - 6 of 6 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
664 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
I've been sleeping with my now 4mo DS since birth and don't have any intentions of stopping any time soon, however I was visiting with my Dad and his wife this weekend and she happened to mention that a women she was working with was EBFeeding her 4mo DD and read that if you co sleep the baby can smell the milk in your breasts and thus want to nurse all night as opposed to putting baby in her own crib, where she will sleep with no interruptions through the night. Apparently this women and her DH tried it and it works...is there any truth to this? My stepmother and Dad do not believe in co sleeping so I didn't know if she was fabricating this or not. Has anyone read/ heard of this before? Thank you!
 

· Registered
Joined
·
2,279 Posts
DS woke much more frequently when he slept right beside me than he does now that he's in his own crib. However, he made that transition when he was older, and we followed his cues in terms of when to do so.

I suppose there is something to the idea that having food right there could be a source of stimulation, but that's a positive thing early on when they really NEED to eat throughout the night.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
4,601 Posts
If it works for them, then it works for them. If it does not work for you, that's fine, too. Some kids do sleep better in their own space. And yes, being right next to Mom does prompt some babies to want to nurse all night or wake up more often (but certainly not all). If you're ok with your situation, don't worry about what other people are doing.
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
9,385 Posts
Well, I did find that when I put a few feet between me and DS (on a mattress across the room, between around 8 and 16 months), that he did manage to give me a longer stretch of 4 to 5 hours, whereas right next to me he woke more often. Whether that's because of smelling the milk, or some other factor, I couldn't say. And both my DDs did sleep longer with DH than they did with me. Some of that, though, has to be because I'm such a restless sleeper, and DH is not.

So I don't know. The idea maybe has some truth in it, that if the breast is so readily available, baby will wake for it. But I think it's more that a baby put to sleep in a separate place, and not responded to, and not fed during the night, soon learns that there's no point in calling out or crying when he awakens, because nobody will come, so he stops crying out. He may still be waking during the night, but his parents are unaware of it. And even if the smell of milk is waking baby-- it wouldn't, if baby wasn't wanting milk, right?

I think that putting some space between you and baby is a good idea to try when nightwaking is wearing you down, especially in the second half of the first year, or in the toddler years. Try putting a sidecarred crib on your bed, or try a mattress on the floor next to your bed. Often it will help baby to give you one longer stretch. As long as you are still responding to baby when baby does wake, there's no harm in trying it. But I wouldn't do a separate room before at least a year old. I don't think it's safe for a baby to be left unattended so long. We're not a long-term co-sleeping family but we do sleep with our babies until they can get to a sitting position on their own easily.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
4,601 Posts
Quote:
But I think it's more that a baby put to sleep in a separate place, and not responded to, and not fed during the night, soon learns that there's no point in calling out or crying when he awakens, because nobody will come, so he stops crying out.
Putting a baby in his own sleeping space and ignoring a baby that cries in the night are not the same thing.
 
1 - 6 of 6 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top