That sounds ridiculous doesnt it? Now switch that to male anatomy."foreskin:the small flap of skin covering the end of the penis, removed during circucision". This is what i read almost every time i read a description of the male anatomy in most american literature. That is if the foreskin is even depicted, labeled or discussed at all. There are probably more important aspects of circumcion to worry about, but i think this just shows how deep the bias is against intact male genitals. I also think this is just one of the many ways the medical society assists in normalizing this archaic violation of infant boys.