Connor had a hearing test yesterday in preparation for our appt on Friday with his specialist. This is the "remind me again why we aren't aiding him?" appointment.
There were several no-shows, so we were able to take our time and get a very thorough test on him, using probes, head phones, sound field, and bone conduction. There's a reason we used all four...probes may be artificially inflating his results by opening his extremely narrow ear canals (he has atresia); head phones may be deflating the results by the pressure collapsing what tiny canals he does have; sound field is difficult because he doesn't localize sound and we don't know which ear he hears it in. If we were to aid him, he would require a bone conductive aid, so I really wanted a complete test with a bone conductive aid on.
He did really well!! He was extremely cooperative, very reliable, and didn't seem to tire.
He still showed the typical loss he's always had at 250-500 Hz, it averaged about 30-35 dB. Between 1000-8000 Hz he had 15-25, which is fine. When we put the bone conduction on him his loss at 250-500 jumped up to only 5 dB which is threshold for that type of aid!!!
:And his reactions with the bone condution were very different...with the probes and head phones he reacts only slightly, and seldom does he try to localize, and when he did try to localize, he often got it wrong initially (i.e. turned right instead of left) (this is his behavior at home, too, he usually shows some sign that he heard the noise, but he doesn't seem able to localize it) With the bone conduction he immediately responded, and localized every time.
:
SO..what does all this mean? Well, this is probably the absolute best his hearing will ever be...right now there is no fluid, no wax, no infection, no swelling to compress his canals, etc (although on the left he did not pass the DPOAE, and we again couldn't get a tympanogram on him) BUT, the loss he's showing is not in the range of speech sounds, so aiding him might not benefit anything. At least not in speech development. It will probably help him be more aware of sounds around him, but the real question is what is there to gain?
Well, I guess another question is what is the harm? Nothing. Except the expense of a bone conductive aid (insurance covers it), and the hassle of getting him to wear it (might be difficult since he'll have to wear it with a soft band
The important thing is that he is responding well to ASL, so he IS communicating with us, and for now we're okay with using ASL. Heck, if he never learns to talk, I'm still okay with it, I just don't ever want to say "what if we had tried an aid?" You know?
Uggh... I wish that he either had no hearing loss, or a worse hearing loss, because this "on the bubble" stuff stinks
:

There were several no-shows, so we were able to take our time and get a very thorough test on him, using probes, head phones, sound field, and bone conduction. There's a reason we used all four...probes may be artificially inflating his results by opening his extremely narrow ear canals (he has atresia); head phones may be deflating the results by the pressure collapsing what tiny canals he does have; sound field is difficult because he doesn't localize sound and we don't know which ear he hears it in. If we were to aid him, he would require a bone conductive aid, so I really wanted a complete test with a bone conductive aid on.
He did really well!! He was extremely cooperative, very reliable, and didn't seem to tire.

He still showed the typical loss he's always had at 250-500 Hz, it averaged about 30-35 dB. Between 1000-8000 Hz he had 15-25, which is fine. When we put the bone conduction on him his loss at 250-500 jumped up to only 5 dB which is threshold for that type of aid!!!


SO..what does all this mean? Well, this is probably the absolute best his hearing will ever be...right now there is no fluid, no wax, no infection, no swelling to compress his canals, etc (although on the left he did not pass the DPOAE, and we again couldn't get a tympanogram on him) BUT, the loss he's showing is not in the range of speech sounds, so aiding him might not benefit anything. At least not in speech development. It will probably help him be more aware of sounds around him, but the real question is what is there to gain?
Well, I guess another question is what is the harm? Nothing. Except the expense of a bone conductive aid (insurance covers it), and the hassle of getting him to wear it (might be difficult since he'll have to wear it with a soft band
The important thing is that he is responding well to ASL, so he IS communicating with us, and for now we're okay with using ASL. Heck, if he never learns to talk, I'm still okay with it, I just don't ever want to say "what if we had tried an aid?" You know?
Uggh... I wish that he either had no hearing loss, or a worse hearing loss, because this "on the bubble" stuff stinks
