Joined
·
1,992 Posts
I live in Canada where the rate of RIC is around 30%. When circ was popular and "everyone was circed" 30 or so years ago, people justified it by saying they wanted to spare their sons embarassment in the locker room.
Now that the majority of kids being born are being left intact, the parents who choose to circ don't seem to care about the potential of their sons being embarassed anymore. Even at at 50% rate, like in the states, don't you think that a kid who is missing half his penis would be more likely to be teased than one who still has a whole one?
I was just thinking about this this morning and it really helps reinforce what a selfish decision circumcision really is.
What are your thoughts?
Now that the majority of kids being born are being left intact, the parents who choose to circ don't seem to care about the potential of their sons being embarassed anymore. Even at at 50% rate, like in the states, don't you think that a kid who is missing half his penis would be more likely to be teased than one who still has a whole one?
I was just thinking about this this morning and it really helps reinforce what a selfish decision circumcision really is.
What are your thoughts?