Myth: Uncircumcised Men Enjoy Sex More

And what's with "fairly common condition"??? The lengths people will go to uphold barbaric practices...

stretching excersizes when flacid.... I mean seriously people.....

Why do dr's goto surgery as first response and claim it is last? Even with the 'little' bit of tugging I have been doing on my circ'ed penis, I have already begun to see new growth and alot more mobility in the skin..... :

Why is it that they always need so many "studies" to promote the mythology in favor of circumcision??!!! In no way do I think men circ'd as infants should be made to feel inferior or "brainwashed" into thinking they can't have a satisfying sex life. But, come on, no amount of "studies" will ever convince me of the illogical argument that mutilating a penis can improve it in any way.

How do you really "study" such a thing? Men who've been circ'd at an avg. age in their 30's wouldn't be an honest comparison. The average circ'd man out there was circ'd as an infant. By the time they're that age they've had several years for their penis and glans to desensitize, while men circ'd later had many years of protection to their sensitivity. It may very well be likely they don't see much difference in the short run. I wonder if their perception would change after 20 or 30 years of being circ'd??

A more honest study would be to take men who fit more of the "norm", circ'd as an infant, and then restored. They have a more real world experience about what it's like to have a penis that was circ'd as an infant and the sensation it's likely to have by the time they're in their 30's. Even though a restored man can never achieve a true, complete foreskin, many men still claim a great gain in their sensation.

Some pro-circ's have claimed it's all psychological because they wanted their foreskin back. However, I don't find that idea very compelling. An intact adult man who has been made to feel "different" his whole life will certainly have a psychological benefit to being circ'd just as well, and may not give an accurate analysis of his true physical sensation after a circ. With so many men restoring their foreskins, something constantly maligned as dirty and undesirable in our culture (US), I've got to believe they do it because of real improvements in sensation and sensuality. They certainly aren't getting much psychological-social benefit out of having a foreskin in this society.

That Dr. that answered that second question is about the norm for the US...quick to cut when it comes to anything with an intact man. It sounds like this man's problem may be related to bad medical advice; the "stretch marks" are probably the result of early forced retractions before it was ready. Still, given the success of men who restore, I would think if he can completely retract at all that he could find the extra "give" he needs by doing some stretching exercises. I hope he gets another opinion; it sounds like the only one who would be made "happy" by a circ i$ the Dr. :

Of course they need to promote it. It is a business! How else are they going to make there 300. Or in a adult 1500 minim per. Then they can either label it a simple operation so they don't have to pay the insurance fees on it like they would a full blown operation. That's one of many reasons they like doing it on infants cause there is differences based off of the risk factor. Now if a doctor practices circumcision only infants with in his practice. He would not get charge as much as if he did it on a adult.

""Can premiums vary?
A medical malpractice insurer is not prohibited from establishing reasonable classifications of risks and premium charges based upon the relative risk associated with practice in a particular specialty."

Now after reading that why do you think doctors label infant circumcision as a simple procedure. Or a risky procedure on a very crucial part of the human body. Hmm I don't $ really know $ why would they lablel it a simple procedure hmm$$$$$ Could it be money$$

http://www.mass.gov/doi/Commercial/C...medmal.html#q5

Quote:
Why? Maybe I don't understand the rules of this borad, it seems a perfectly legit subject for a anti circ topic?

Quote:
While this question seems very fishy to me, I would think the forskin would have grown to accomodate erections as the man grew- like a male PP said, even with gentle tugging you can get an already grown up penis skin to stretch (like lots of guys do to restore) lets just say the guy really has a problem. If he does it is RARE! I will acknowlege that uncirced peni (how do you plural that ) once in a while have problems, but making it sound like these problems are common, puh-lease!