So, I am a member of 3FatChicks, and I seem to have just pissed off several of the members by mentioning formula's link to obesity. (In the context of how many mamas feed their bottlefed babies a set amount; I firmly believe this leads to not being able to recognize your satiety signal, which is a problem 99% of the overweight folks I know have. Heck, I even said that it is fully possible to bottlefeed with love & attention, but the thread in question was about bottle propping.
: )
Anyhow, it brought up a bigger issue...
WHY is it not appropriate to mention babyfeeding in the context of nutrition? I guarantee you that if I went to 3FC and said I could eat a freaking Big Mac every single day as part of my normal routine and still lose weight and be perfectly healthy, they'd jump all over me for it.
There is little agreement as to proper nutrition for adults. Some people are convinced that low-carb is the way to go, some people are convinced we should all be on a vegan, raw food diet, and there are hundreds if not thousands of variations within that whole continuum. The whole eggs vs egg whites thing pops immediately to mind. Dr Agatston, the cardiologist who wrote The South Beach Diet, says that it's 100% OK to use whole eggs. Dr Floyd Chilton, the research scientist who wrote the book Inflammation Nation (which is about a dietary treatment for autoimmune diseases like rheumatoid arthritis), will tell you to avoid them because of their inflammation-causing properties.
So, for adults there is plenty of room for question. But for babies there isn't. EVERY reputable authority out there will tell you that breastfeeding is optimal nutrition for babies.
So why the
can I not come out and say that? If I am expected to speak out when a woman is starving herself on 800 calories a day, why am I expected to stay quiet about a woman giving her child the wrong food because it is "personal choice"?
Seriously, we recognize the influence of big business on adults' eating choices. I cannot count the number of threads that site has had on SuperSize Me. There are occasional discussions of Fast Food Nation, and once the movie version comes out I am certain there will be even more. So why can't there also be an honest discussion of the influence of corporations on women's feeding choices?
Am I the only one who sees the parallels here?

Anyhow, it brought up a bigger issue...
WHY is it not appropriate to mention babyfeeding in the context of nutrition? I guarantee you that if I went to 3FC and said I could eat a freaking Big Mac every single day as part of my normal routine and still lose weight and be perfectly healthy, they'd jump all over me for it.
There is little agreement as to proper nutrition for adults. Some people are convinced that low-carb is the way to go, some people are convinced we should all be on a vegan, raw food diet, and there are hundreds if not thousands of variations within that whole continuum. The whole eggs vs egg whites thing pops immediately to mind. Dr Agatston, the cardiologist who wrote The South Beach Diet, says that it's 100% OK to use whole eggs. Dr Floyd Chilton, the research scientist who wrote the book Inflammation Nation (which is about a dietary treatment for autoimmune diseases like rheumatoid arthritis), will tell you to avoid them because of their inflammation-causing properties.
So, for adults there is plenty of room for question. But for babies there isn't. EVERY reputable authority out there will tell you that breastfeeding is optimal nutrition for babies.
So why the

Seriously, we recognize the influence of big business on adults' eating choices. I cannot count the number of threads that site has had on SuperSize Me. There are occasional discussions of Fast Food Nation, and once the movie version comes out I am certain there will be even more. So why can't there also be an honest discussion of the influence of corporations on women's feeding choices?
Am I the only one who sees the parallels here?