I actually have one circed son and soon to be 3 intact sons.
I was very young and impressionable when my oldest was born. My mother, an RN, convinced me to circ him with her "dirty old man in the hospital with a terrible infection" stories. After joining MDC shortly after the birth of my second son I came to realize that the chance of infections in 70 some odd years was not a good reason to amputate normal, healthy body parts and that the problem was not the foreskin, but the nurses responsible for keeping those "dirty old men" clean. The main reason son #2 was not circed was because Medicaid in my state did not pay for it and although I did not want to circ my son, my male partner at the time did but the idea of paying out of pocket for it when we could scarcely afford to feed ourselves saved my little boy. Only after being an MDC member for a few months did I discover just what a blessing in disguise this situation had been! Needless to say, after being an avid reader in the Case Against Circumcision forum for years now, when son #3 was born in December of '05 he was left intact and of course my daughter was left intact as well in February of '07. My fourth son will be born sometime in January or February '09 and will be left intact as well.
I realize you are looking for advice or stories but honestly, the status of my sons' penises has never been an issue. Not for them, me, my DH or any of our health care providers. There is no advice to give or stories to tell because leaving the rest intact was the default for me and although my oldest son did one time notice his younger brother's foreskin, once he was retractable they realized they were pretty much the same.