Dude, that's a beautiful baby! I seriously have a hard time checking the breast out because the baby's eyes keep pulling me in.
And it's not like you actually see nipple or anything to PROVE that it's a breast and not a....peach colored ball? Just imagine for a minute that a shoulder or elbow or...pregnant belly is blocking the baby's face. If I look at the photo thinking that, I can see it that way, so how much more could they have done to suggest
breast without showing
(all identifying parts of a) breast? I don't think it's ALL that explicit, frankly (could it be a ball?!)
C'mon, people! A mother of a four-month-old saying "Gross"?! And being "sick" of seeing a baby "attached to a boob"? Is that a joke, like "why would I want to see it on a magazine when I can look down 25 times a day and see it right in front of me?" or a person who really hates breastfeeding her baby, or a person who does not breastfeed and is, um, sick of seeing babies nursing? Wow.
I guess all the comments, the emotion, the outrage blow my mind but from a mother of a young infant?! (I guess most subscribers would fit that category, though.) Yikes.
And how could you say "gross" when that baby's face is the focal point of the whole thing (and how lovely that the focal point for the infant is the mom! It's so obvious, and so nice.)
I read somewhere else that one mother tore off the cover and shredded it so her teen sons wouldn't see it. "Why should they see that? Breasts are about sex," or something along those lines was the quote.