Joined
·
7,556 Posts
I've received several PMs asking what whooping cough is doing in this country. I've said I'd answer here.
Just because we hang off the end of the earth doesn't mean that disease doesn't happen.
Whooping cough is rampant in this country and the reason they are saying nothing publicly, is because they know the vaccine is a dud. The as much as admit so in this report:
http://www.surv.esr.cri.nz/PDF_surve...04December.pdf
It's a large file, 1.6 mb... but download it.
Look at the second page on the top right side of the page and you will see a new term.
This vaccine brought in in 2001, was touted with the best ever efficacy and here they are saying the "The effective vaccination rate may in some cases be as low as 33%"
So I think we are going to see new terminology at some point, where vaccine which are lousy have "effective" vaccination rates
:
There are four other reports that those with a mind for these things might wish to have a look at:
http://www.surv.esr.cri.nz/PDF_surve...ualSurvRpt.pdf
http://www.surv.esr.cri.nz/PDF_surve...ualSurvRpt.pdf
http://www.surv.esr.cri.nz/PDF_surve...ualSurvRpt.pdf
http://www.surv.esr.cri.nz/PDF_surve...ualSurvRpt.pdf
All of them are large. All very revealing.
There are other reports and tables worth reading on this site, but its a bit of a mission to find them.
This should answer questions asked so far.
Just because we hang off the end of the earth doesn't mean that disease doesn't happen.
Whooping cough is rampant in this country and the reason they are saying nothing publicly, is because they know the vaccine is a dud. The as much as admit so in this report:
http://www.surv.esr.cri.nz/PDF_surve...04December.pdf
It's a large file, 1.6 mb... but download it.
Look at the second page on the top right side of the page and you will see a new term.
This vaccine brought in in 2001, was touted with the best ever efficacy and here they are saying the "The effective vaccination rate may in some cases be as low as 33%"
So I think we are going to see new terminology at some point, where vaccine which are lousy have "effective" vaccination rates

There are four other reports that those with a mind for these things might wish to have a look at:
http://www.surv.esr.cri.nz/PDF_surve...ualSurvRpt.pdf
http://www.surv.esr.cri.nz/PDF_surve...ualSurvRpt.pdf
http://www.surv.esr.cri.nz/PDF_surve...ualSurvRpt.pdf
http://www.surv.esr.cri.nz/PDF_surve...ualSurvRpt.pdf
All of them are large. All very revealing.
There are other reports and tables worth reading on this site, but its a bit of a mission to find them.
This should answer questions asked so far.