Mothering Forum banner

Please help my friends baby's penis!

966 Views 12 Replies 10 Participants Last post by  iamama
My friends had their baby circ'd b/c their dr. recommended it after my friend brought in a diaper with a bit of blood on it. FF to NOW the dr. is giving this poor child painful retractions of the foreskin bc the skin is reattacting itself?? PLEASE I feel like this is sooo not right. They live in Portland OR if anyone also wants to recommend a penis friendly dr for them! Why is this dr. doing this painful retraction...?? I want to get them tons of info so that they don't feel like they have to put their little guy thru this again. My heart breaks for him.
See less See more
1 - 13 of 13 Posts
The recommendation for when a circ starts to reattach is just leave it alone since the penis is trying to heal itself and then when he is older if he still has skin bridges he can have them fixed then if they cause a problem. Most of the adheasions usually release at puberty if left on there own.

Sounds like your friend took in a diaper with brick dust in it the first time. This happens when a baby is new and is flushing out its system can also happen if a little dehydrated. The dr cut the baby for no reason at all
I am so sorry your friends little guy is being hurt like this. I am sure others will come in with info. to give to your friend.
See less See more
2
Quote:

Originally Posted by MRDCatLvr
Sounds like your friend took in a diaper with brick dust in it the first time. This happens when a baby is new and is flushing out its system can also happen if a little dehydrated. The dr cut the baby for no reason at all
I am so sorry your friends little guy is being hurt like this. I am sure others will come in with info. to give to your friend.
My thoughts exactly....
See less See more
3
Quote:

Originally Posted by MRDCatLvr
Sounds like your friend took in a diaper with brick dust in it the first time. This happens when a baby is new and is flushing out its system can also happen if a little dehydrated. The dr cut the baby for no reason at all
I am so sorry your friends little guy is being hurt like this. I am sure others will come in with info. to give to your friend.
:

My youngest had "brick dust" when he was a newborn. Its orangish. I didn't know what it was, but soon found out. That doctor just found an excuse to cut! What sense does it make to have "a bit of blood" (even if that's what it was) and then create MORE blood with first a circ and then forced retractions?
See less See more
3
As quick and errant as the Dr. was in circ'ing the first time, they should be very leery about being set up for a re-circ. I agree with a pp to leave it alone. Constantly reseparating the adhesions most likely will not work and is just going to add to the damages that child has already suffered.
My ds also had it and I called the ped and he asked was he circed and when i said no he said well if it does it again bring him in. I shudder to think that he was prolly gonna suggest a foreskin problem. I dont know that for sure but.... Lucky enough i had a appt for his 3 day check up with the nurse that works with my mw and she told me what it was and it just happened that ds had a new diaper on with it in there and she was able to confirm it.
See less See more
leaving the adhesions alone is good advice. It makes me so mad that doctors automatically circumcise for even the smallest reason they can think of


Misty
See less See more
My son had it too and only once . Our Pedi in burbank said wait and see if it goes away and it didn't come back.

I can't believe the lack of common sense as the pp said If there is little blood why create more blood with a circ -that is one heck of a bad doctor who don't think.

The poor boy circed for no reason at all just because of a scare tatic from a doctor .
I think they should sue this quack doctor. Seriously. They should contact David Llewellyn (username Dave2GA here) for some advice.
jeeeeeeebus, dude, that "brick dust" is so common it's not even funny.

That doc was lying his butt off in the first place; he had to have seen a million babies (half of them GIRLS) with it, and he recommended a circumcision?

Sick, sick, sick. Poor baby and mama.
See less See more
Penile adhesions develop frequently after circumcision. Up to 71% of circumcised boys develop adhesions, although they are usually mild and very rarely require treatment. Most adhesions will release in their own in time, and the current recommendation is to leave them alone. If your son develops adhesions, it does not mean that the circumcision was botched, nor are they an indication for recircumcision. The following resources should provide reassurance and empower you to ensure your son's adhesions are not unnecessarily released manually (lysed, or 'torn back') by a well meaning-but inadequately informed-care provider.

J Urol. 2001 Mar;165(3):915.

Penile adhesions after neonatal circumcision.

Ponsky LE, Ross JH, Knipper N, Kay R.

Department of Urology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

"In these groups we noted an adhesion rate of 71%, 28%, 8% and 2%, respectively. The rate of adhesions more severe than grade 1 was 30%, 10% and 0% in boys 12 months old or younger, 13 to 60 and 61 months old or older, respectively. The oldest patient with grade 3 adhesions was 31 months old. Skin bridges in 6 cases involved the circumcision line in 4."

"CONCLUSIONS: Penile adhesions develop after circumcision and the incidence decreases with patient age. Although there is debate on whether to lyse these adhesions manually, our findings suggest that adhesions resolve without treatment. Based on our results we do not recommend lysing penile adhesions, except perhaps those involving the circumcision line."

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/q...&dopt=Abstract

"Penile adhesions occur frequently after circumcision. Some physicians advocate manual lysis of the adhesions. This procedure can be painful and traumatic. Penile adhesions are normal in uncircumcised boys and normally resolve without treatment."

http://www.kidsgrowth.com/resources/...il.cfm?id=3420

Gil Fuld, M.D., F.A.A.P.

"Sometimes after a routine newborn circumcision, excess foreskin remains. Since newborn circumcision is not medically necessary, it's certainly better to leave a little extra than to take off too much and damage the child's penis."

"So, it's a common occurrence in little boys for adhesions to develop under any remaining foreskin, although it's rarely a problem and practically never requires a repeat circumcision."

http://www.medem.com/medlb/article_d...NC&sub_cat=474

Vincent Iannelli, M.D.

"It isn't really normal, but is a common complication after a circumcision. In a situation like this, penile adhesions form when the skin on the shaft of the penis attaches itself to the glans or head of the penis. In extreme cases, it can look like the child was never even circumcised, leading parents to believe that the child had a 'bad circumcision.'"

"If the skin is attached only on the very base of the glans, then your child has a very mild case of penile adhesions and you can likely just leave it alone. It should eventually separate, especially once your child becomes older, and anyway, forcing it apart would be painful."

http://pediatrics.about.com/od/weekl...l_adhesion.htm

"The foreskin will almost always detach itself in time as a boy develops. It should not be forcibly retracted. This may lead to scarred adhesions that will not detach without surgery. Penile growth is not usually influenced by adhesion of the foreskin to the glans penis."

http://www.henryfordhealth.org/19160.cfm
See less See more
1 - 13 of 13 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top