[carriebft]

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19294881/

Yes, it is worded EXACTLY like the last one (in which NO CIRC kicked butt). Apparently MSNBC couldn't accept those results and is holding a new poll. So please vote!!!

 

[incorrigible]

I see results, but I can't find a link to the original pole to vote in it...

 

[carriebft]

Opps, try this:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19294881/

halfway down the page, click on "should newborns be circumcised?" in red

 

[christifav]

Seriously...the response was OVERWHELMINGLY no the first time (70/30). Why the heck are they re-running the same poll? Are they just going to keep running it until they get the results they want? If that is the case they should just end the poll after the first "pro" voter. 100% of respondents say "yes" to circ.

 

[fishface]

It says my response cannot be recorded and I just see results, WTH

 

[carriebft]

I edited the link. Just scroll down to the red words "should newborn infants be circumcised?"

 

[fishface]

I did, hence the "It says my response cannot be recorded and I just see results, WTH".

 

[carriebft]

ops, thought you clicked on my first link (which I think was wrong becuase i linked from my results).

maybe try clearing cookies and trying again?

 

[carriebft]

NO just went from 62 to 55 in like a minute....

:

Down to 53....wow....some circ fetish site must have gotten ahold of this. 300 yes votes in less than 60 seconds???

 

[carriebft]

Wow...down to 50 now....

 

[kldliam]

I could be wrong, but I think they have blocked certain IP addresses from voting, if that is possible? Maybe all the anti-circ's who voted in the last poll? It is very odd that they would yank those results and set the poll back to zero. I wonder if there is a very pro mgm person in charge of this poll.

Why is it that 'we' can't vote? how many of you voted in the last poll who are unable to vote in this poll?? It will not accept my vote either. Is anyone here having any success with it?

PLEASE VOTE and let us know if you are having problems too.

 

[carriebft]

I refreshed the page 4 times in succession and the poll went from 61NO 39 YES to 50/50 then I did it again and it was 47NO and dropping.

I can't help being suspicious...there were 300 YES votes in a very small span and now people are being blocked from voting...

EDIT: I could vote and my IP is different than the other poll because I'm on the upstairs computer...

 

[carriebft]

I checked the downstairs computer (the one that I used to vote last time) and I was not able to vote.

So I could vote on the computer I didnt use last time but not on the one I did...

 

[kldliam]

Quote:

carriebft: EDIT: I could vote and my IP is different than the other poll because I'm on the upstairs computer...

can you try the computer you voted on in the last poll? i'm just curious about this now.

 

[kldliam]

Quote:

carriebft: I checked the downstairs computer (the one that I used to vote last time) and I was not able to vote. So I could vote on the computer I didnt use last time but not on the one I did...

They blocked our IP address! Wow, I was hoping I was just paranoid.

 

[carriebft]

Maybe someone else with two comps can try this? I am really hoping this is just some coincidence because, if not, my outlook just got a whole lot gloomier.

 

[Tinker]

Quote:

Originally Posted by kldliam They blocked our IP address! Wow, I was hoping I was just paranoid.

How is that even legal?

 

[blsilva]

I can't vote, either.

:

 

[guestmama9908]

I was able to vote on the same computer I used last time.

I am shocked though at how the tone of the article attached has changed. The picture of those two little boys and the caption below it is heartbreaking. Poor boys

:

 

[kldliam]

Quote:

Tinker:How is that even legal?

Well it's their poll. They probabally compiled a database of all the IP addresses
who voted nocirc last time and put a block on them to get the online Intactivists out of the vote. I don't know, just a hunch. Let's wait and see how many people who voted in this poll last time are blocked this time...