I declined the NT scan and the quad screening, so my doc put "no genetic testing" on my chart. Well, I had to go in for my initial blood work yesterday because I switched from the RE (fertility doc) to the OB. My doc does not push for these tests at all. She's very low-intervention for an OB.
I got a call this morning from the OB's office that the phlebotomist (sp?) drew a tube of blood for the quad screen, but they noticed on my chart that it said "no genetic testing" so she wanted to check with me. Since it was already drawn would I prefer they run the test or just discard the blood? I chose not to have them run the test. For a second, I was thinking that hearing that the test came back indicating a healthy baby might be nice. But I would refuse an amnio, and this is one of the things that doesn't make me worry. I know someone who worried through the second half of her pregnancy after the quad screen only to have a healthy baby.
That was the right call in this situation, right? One less thing to worry about. Why am I second-guessing?
I got a call this morning from the OB's office that the phlebotomist (sp?) drew a tube of blood for the quad screen, but they noticed on my chart that it said "no genetic testing" so she wanted to check with me. Since it was already drawn would I prefer they run the test or just discard the blood? I chose not to have them run the test. For a second, I was thinking that hearing that the test came back indicating a healthy baby might be nice. But I would refuse an amnio, and this is one of the things that doesn't make me worry. I know someone who worried through the second half of her pregnancy after the quad screen only to have a healthy baby.
That was the right call in this situation, right? One less thing to worry about. Why am I second-guessing?